"Risk Assessment" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
The qualitative or quantitative estimation of the likelihood of adverse effects that may result from exposure to specified health hazards or from the absence of beneficial influences. (Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 1988)
| Descriptor ID |
D018570
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
E05.318.740.600.800.715 N04.452.871.715 N05.715.360.750.625.700.690 N06.850.505.715 N06.850.520.830.600.800.715
|
| Concept/Terms |
Risk Assessment- Risk Assessment
- Assessments, Risk
- Risk Assessments
- Health Risk Assessment
- Assessment, Health Risk
- Assessments, Health Risk
- Health Risk Assessments
- Risk Assessment, Health
- Risk Assessments, Health
- Assessment, Risk
Benefit-Risk Assessment- Benefit-Risk Assessment
- Assessment, Benefit-Risk
- Assessments, Benefit-Risk
- Benefit Risk Assessment
- Benefit-Risk Assessments
- Risk-Benefit Assessment
- Assessment, Risk-Benefit
- Assessments, Risk-Benefit
- Risk Benefit Assessment
- Risk-Benefit Assessments
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Risk Assessment".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Risk Assessment".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Risk Assessment" by people in this website by year, and whether "Risk Assessment" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text,
click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 1995 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 1996 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| 1997 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| 1998 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| 1999 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 2000 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
| 2001 | 2 | 24 | 26 |
| 2002 | 0 | 34 | 34 |
| 2003 | 3 | 51 | 54 |
| 2004 | 4 | 55 | 59 |
| 2005 | 4 | 59 | 63 |
| 2006 | 7 | 41 | 48 |
| 2007 | 8 | 63 | 71 |
| 2008 | 2 | 92 | 94 |
| 2009 | 6 | 80 | 86 |
| 2010 | 5 | 102 | 107 |
| 2011 | 2 | 142 | 144 |
| 2012 | 6 | 121 | 127 |
| 2013 | 5 | 116 | 121 |
| 2014 | 16 | 119 | 135 |
| 2015 | 16 | 99 | 115 |
| 2016 | 16 | 138 | 154 |
| 2017 | 19 | 148 | 167 |
| 2018 | 20 | 137 | 157 |
| 2019 | 25 | 142 | 167 |
| 2020 | 22 | 143 | 165 |
| 2021 | 14 | 103 | 117 |
| 2022 | 0 | 39 | 39 |
| 2023 | 0 | 51 | 51 |
| 2024 | 1 | 99 | 100 |
| 2025 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
To return to the timeline,
click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Risk Assessment" by people in Profiles.
-
Prediction of breast cancer risk for adolescents and young adults with Hodgkin lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2025 Apr 01; 117(4):619-628.
-
Unveiling the Genetic Landscape of Coronary Artery Disease Through Common and Rare Structural Variants. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Feb 18; 14(4):e036499.
-
AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on the Prevention and Treatment of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in At-Risk Individuals. Gastroenterology. 2025 Feb; 168(2):267-284.
-
Residual Mitral Regurgitation Interacts With Transmitral Mean Pressure Gradient to Modify the Association With Mortality Following Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb; 18(2):e014843.
-
Early-onset atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2025 Jan 27; 32(2):100-112.
-
Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Mar; 105(4):959-969.
-
Predicting and Ranking Diabetic Ketoacidosis Risk Among Youth with Type 1 Diabetes with a Clinic-to-Clinic Transferrable Machine Learning Model. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2025 Apr; 27(4):271-282.
-
A novel machine learning-based cancer-specific cardiovascular disease risk score among patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2025 Jan 03; 9(1).
-
Mortality Risk Prediction Models for People With Kidney Failure: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 02; 8(1):e2453190.
-
Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate to predict cardiac events in major noncardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of two large international studies. Br J Anaesth. 2025 Feb; 134(2):297-307.