Connection

NADIA ISMAIL to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications NADIA ISMAIL has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.183
  1. Bridging the Gap in Competency Assessment During Transition from Undergraduate Medical Education to Graduate Medical Education: A Perspective Piece. Am J Med. 2023 09; 136(9):941-945.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  2. Near-peers effectively teach clinical documentation skills to early medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Oct 08; 22(1):712.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  3. Variations in Medical Students' Educational Preferences, Attitudes and Volunteerism during the COVID-19 Global Pandemic. J Community Health. 2021 Dec; 46(6):1204-1212.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  4. Teaching Laboratory Stewardship in the Medical Student Core Clerkships Pathology-Teaches. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 07 01; 144(7):883-887.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  5. How to Teach Laboratory Stewardship in the Undergraduate Medical Curriculum? Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 01 01; 153(1):66-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  6. An Interprofessional Standardized Patient Case for Improving Collaboration, Shared Accountability, and Respect in Team-Based Family Discussions. MedEdPORTAL. 2019 01 04; 15:10791.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  7. Stepping Back: How Should Pass/Fail Scoring Influence Step 1 Timing? Acad Med. 2025 02 01; 100(2):137-143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  8. Addressing unprofessional behaviors in the clinical learning environment: lessons from a multi-year virtual, intergenerational, interdisciplinary workshop. Med Educ Online. 2024 Dec 31; 29(1):2316491.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  9. Medical student advising during virtual residency recruitment: results of a national survey of internal medicine clerkship and sub-internship directors. Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec; 28(1):2143926.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  10. Twelve tips for using the Understanding by Design? curriculum planning framework. Med Teach. 2024 01; 46(1):34-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  11. Reviewing Internal Medicine Clerkship Grading Through a Proequity Lens: Results of a National Survey. Acad Med. 2023 06 01; 98(6):723-728.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  12. Innovation and Missed Opportunities in Internal Medicine Undergraduate Education During COVID-19: Results from a National Survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 07; 37(9):2149-2155.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  13. Roles and Responsibilities of Medicine Subinternship Directors : Medicine Subinternship Director Roles. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 08; 37(11):2698-2702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  14. Aiming for Equity in Clerkship Grading: Recommendations for Reducing the Effects of Structural and Individual Bias. Am J Med. 2021 09; 134(9):1175-1183.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  15. Grade Appeals in the Internal Medicine Clerkship: A National Survey and Recommendations for Improvement. Am J Med. 2021 06; 134(6):817-822.e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  16. Determining Grades in the Internal Medicine Clerkship: Results of a National Survey of Clerkship Directors. Acad Med. 2021 02 01; 96(2):249-255.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  17. Strategies From 11 U.S. Medical Schools for Integrating Basic Science Into Core Clerkships. Acad Med. 2021 08 01; 96(8):1125-1130.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  18. AAIM Recommendations for the 2020-2021 Internal Medicine Residency Application Cycle in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Med. 2020 10; 133(10):1223-1226.e6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  19. A National Survey of Undergraduate Clinical Education in Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 05; 34(5):699-704.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  20. Toolbox for evaluating residents as teachers. Acad Psychiatry. 2010 Jul-Aug; 34(4):298-301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.