"Supreme Court Decisions" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
Decisions made by the United States Supreme Court.
| Descriptor ID |
D035521
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
I01.880.604.583.858
|
| Concept/Terms |
Supreme Court Decisions- Supreme Court Decisions
- Decision, Supreme Court
- Decisions, Supreme Court
- Supreme Court Decision
- United States Supreme Court Decisions
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Supreme Court Decisions".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Supreme Court Decisions".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Supreme Court Decisions" by people in this website by year, and whether "Supreme Court Decisions" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text,
click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 2010 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2012 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2014 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2022 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2023 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| 2024 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
To return to the timeline,
click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Supreme Court Decisions" by people in Profiles.
-
Trainee Perspectives Regarding the Effect of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Supreme Court Decision on Obstetrics and Gynecology Training. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2024 Jul; 33(7):908-915.
-
Renewed calls for abortion-related research in the post-Roe era. Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1322299.
-
Addressing challenges related to the professional practice of abortion post-Roe. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 05; 230(5):532-539.
-
Addressing Moral Distress After Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization : A Professional Virtues-Based Approach. Acad Med. 2024 01 01; 99(1):12-15.
-
Pregnancy in Patients With Advanced?Heart?Failure: Impact of Overturn of Roe v Wade Ruling. JACC Heart Fail. 2023 03; 11(3):362-364.
-
Implications of United States Supreme Court's ruling on Dobbs vs Jackson Women's Health Organization: perspective of physicians caring for critically ill fetuses and newborns. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 12; 60(6):812-813.
-
Protecting our Patients and Trainees: The Complex Consequences of the Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization Ruling. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 11 01; 114(3):393-395.
-
Undue burdens created by the Texas Abortion Law for vulnerable pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 04; 226(4):529-534.
-
Evaluating the Legitimacy of Contemporary Legal Strategies for Obesity. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2015 Dec; 25(4):369-93.
-
Do recent US Supreme Court rulings on patenting of genes and genetic diagnostics affect the practice of genetic screening and diagnosis in prenatal and reproductive care? Prenat Diagn. 2014 Oct; 34(10):921-6.