Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by GORDON B MILLS and SHANNON NEVILLE WESTIN.
Connection Strength

2.989
  1. Phase Ib Dose Expansion and Translational Analyses of Olaparib in Combination with Capivasertib in Recurrent Endometrial, Triple-Negative Breast, and Ovarian Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 12 01; 27(23):6354-6365.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.835
  2. Phase II, 2-stage, 2-arm, PIK3CA mutation stratified trial of MK-2206 in recurrent endometrial cancer. Int J Cancer. 2020 07 15; 147(2):413-422.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  3. Safety lead-in of the MEK inhibitor trametinib in combination with GSK2141795, an AKT inhibitor, in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer: An NRG Oncology/GOG study. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 12; 155(3):420-428.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  4. Sequential Therapy with PARP and WEE1 Inhibitors Minimizes Toxicity while Maintaining Efficacy. Cancer Cell. 2019 06 10; 35(6):851-867.e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  5. Adaptive responses in a PARP inhibitor window of opportunity trial illustrate limited functional interlesional heterogeneity and potential combination therapy options. Oncotarget. 2019 May 28; 10(37):3533-3546.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  6. Using Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) to Identify and Target Adaptive Resistance. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019; 1188:251-266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  7. Rational combination therapy with PARP and MEK inhibitors capitalizes on therapeutic liabilities in RAS mutant cancers. Sci Transl Med. 2017 05 31; 9(392).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  8. The rise of genomic profiling in ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016 12; 16(12):1337-1351.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  9. The management of malignant ascites and impact on quality of life outcomes in women with ovarian cancer. Expert Rev Qual Life Cancer Care. 2016; 1(3):231-238.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  10. PTEN loss is a context-dependent outcome determinant in obese and non-obese endometrioid endometrial cancer patients. Mol Oncol. 2015 Oct; 9(8):1694-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  11. Clinical investigation of receptor and non-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013 Nov; 14(16):2171-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  12. Repurposing the Pap smear: one step closer to gynecologic cancer screening. Sci Transl Med. 2013 Jan 09; 5(167):167ps1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  13. Whole-exome sequencing combined with functional genomics reveals novel candidate driver cancer genes in endometrial cancer. Genome Res. 2012 Nov; 22(11):2120-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  14. The spectrum of MAPK-ERK pathway genomic alterations in gynecologic malignancies: Opportunities for novel therapeutic approaches. Gynecol Oncol. 2023 Oct; 177:86-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  15. A phase II study of MK-2206, an AKT inhibitor, in uterine serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Apr; 40:100974.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  16. Molecular Analysis of Clinically Defined Subsets of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer. Cell Rep. 2020 04 14; 31(2):107502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  17. Development of prediction models for lymph node metastasis in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2020 03; 122(7):1014-1022.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  18. Olaparib and a-specific PI3K inhibitor alpelisib for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: a dose-escalation and dose-expansion phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 04; 20(4):570-580.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  19. Proteomic profiling of endometrioid endometrial cancer reveals differential expression of hormone receptors and MAPK signaling proteins in obese versus non-obese patients. Oncotarget. 2017 Dec 05; 8(63):106989-107001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  20. Integrative Protein-Based Prognostic Model for Early-Stage Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jan 15; 22(2):513-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.