Connection

SEYED EBRAHIM KASSAIAN to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications SEYED EBRAHIM KASSAIAN has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.267
  1. Cardio-oncology: Implications for Clinical Practice for Women. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2022 11; 24(11):1685-1698.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  2. Novel Scoring System for Prediction of Cardiac Syndrome X in Women with Typical Angina and a Positive Exercise Tolerance Test. Tex Heart Inst J. 2018 02; 45(1):5-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  3. Asymptomatic Interrupted Aortic Arch, Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation, and Bicuspid Aortic Valve in a 76-Year-Old Woman. Tex Heart Inst J. 2016 Oct; 43(5):437-440.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  4. Comparison of 1-year Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Receiving Intracoronary Bolus Only Versus Intracoronary Bolus Plus Infusion of Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016 09; 15(3):89-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  5. Biodegradable-Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents at One-Year Follow-Up: A Registry-Based Cohort Study. Tex Heart Inst J. 2016 Apr; 43(2):126-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  6. Clinical characteristics, management and 1-year outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome in Iran: the Iranian Project for Assessment of Coronary Events 2 (IPACE2). BMJ Open. 2015 12 15; 5(12):e007786.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  7. Major adverse events, six months after endovascular revascularization for critical limb ischemia in diabetic patients. Arch Iran Med. 2013 May; 16(5):258-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  8. Staged carotid artery stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery versus isolated coronary artery bypass surgery in concomitant coronary and carotid disease. J Invasive Cardiol. 2013 Jan; 25(1):8-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  9. Endovascular treatment of acute type B dissection complicating aortic coarctation. Tex Heart Inst J. 2013; 40(2):176-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  10. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and clinical outcomes in diabetic patients following coronary artery stenting. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012 Jul 17; 11:82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  11. Outcomes of stenting with overlapping drug-eluting stents versus overlapping drug-eluting and bare-metal stents for the treatment of diffuse coronary lesions. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2010 Nov-Dec; 21(6):311-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  12. Complex carotid stenting using a coronary technique. J Endovasc Ther. 2008 Aug; 15(4):490-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  13. Myocardial infarction secondary to premature coronary artery disease as the initial major manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2008 May-Jun; 19(3):152-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  14. Transcatheter closure of a coronary fistula with an Amplatzer vascular plug: should a retrograde approach be standard? Tex Heart Inst J. 2008; 35(1):58-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  15. Stent-graft exclusion of multiple symptomatic coronary artery fistulae. Tex Heart Inst J. 2007; 34(2):199-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  16. A novel scoring system for identifying high-risk patients undergoing carotid stenting. Arch Iran Med. 2006 Apr; 9(2):129-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  17. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis: a novel risk score. Eur Heart J. 2026 Mar 05; 47(9):1050-1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  18. Coronary microvascular dysfunction and cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 11; 68:45-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  19. Twelve-Year History of STEMI Management in Tehran Heart Center: Concomitant Reduction of In-Hospital Mortality and Hospitalization Length. Arch Iran Med. 2020 08 01; 23(8):514-521.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  20. Nanoscale Technologies for Prevention and Treatment of Heart Failure: Challenges and Opportunities. Chem Rev. 2019 11 13; 119(21):11352-11390.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  21. The Association Between Modified Intracoronary Thrombus Grade and Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Initial Laboratory Findings in Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2019 09; 18(3):135-138.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  22. Effect of Various Degrees of Chronic Kidney Disease on Long-term Outcome of Patients with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Arch Iran Med. 2019 05 01; 22(5):247-251.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  23. Effect of Age on Procedural Success, Complications, and Clinical Outcome From a Large Angioplasty Registry. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2019 03; 18(1):23-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  24. Comparing Serum Level of Vitamin D3 in Patients With Isolated Coronary Artery Ectasia and Normal Coronary Artery Individuals. Arch Iran Med. 2018 09 01; 21(9):393-398.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  25. Predictors of Long-term Major Adverse Cardiac Events Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Elderly. Arch Iran Med. 2018 08 01; 21(8):344-348.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  26. Impact of Sex on Long-term Clinical Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2017 12; 16(4):161-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  27. Sex-dependent effects of diabetes mellitus on the revascularization rate in mid-term follow up of young patients with coronary artery disease. J Diabetes Complications. 2017 Dec; 31(12):1686-1690.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  28. Predictors of major adverse cardiac events following elective stenting of large coronary arteries. Indian Heart J. 2018 Jan - Feb; 70(1):20-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  29. Factors Associated with Anxiety in Premature Coronary Artery Disease Patients: THC-PAC Study. Acta Med Iran. 2016 Apr; 54(4):261-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  30. Comparing clinical outcomes for a twelve-month trial of zotarolimus- and everolimus-eluting stents in patients with coronary artery disease: data from the THCRIC registry. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Aug; 10(4):206-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  31. The impact of cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphism on the occurrence of one-year in-stent restenosis in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention: A case-match study. Anatol J Cardiol. 2015 May; 15(5):348-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  32. Selective versus exclusive use of drug-eluting stents in treating multivessel coronary artery disease: a real-world cohort study. Tex Heart Inst J. 2014 Oct; 41(5):477-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  33. Percutaneous coronary intervention to treat chronic total occlusion: predictors of technical success and one-year clinical outcome. Tex Heart Inst J. 2014 Feb; 41(1):40-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  34. A randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Crocus sativus L. with fluoxetine for improving mild to moderate depression in post percutaneous coronary intervention patients. J Affect Disord. 2014 Feb; 155:216-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  35. A case of successful percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion using the reversed guidewire technique. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2013 Jul; 28(3):282-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  36. On-label and off-label use of drug-eluting stents: comparison of short- and long-term outcomes. Tex Heart Inst J. 2012; 39(1):24-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  37. Sodium bicarbonate in preventing contrast nephropathy in patients at risk for volume overload: a randomized controlled trial. J Nephrol. 2010 Mar-Apr; 23(2):216-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  38. In-hospital and mid-term clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with the use of sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents. Kardiol Pol. 2009 Dec; 67(12):1344-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  39. Sodium bicarbonate plus isotonic saline versus saline for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009 Oct; 54(4):610-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  40. Factors predicting discontinuation of a hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation programme. Kardiol Pol. 2009 Feb; 67(2):140-6; discussion 147-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  41. In-hospital and mid-term adverse clinical outcomes of a direct stenting strategy versus stenting after pre-dilatation for the treatment of coronary artery lesions. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2008 Nov-Dec; 19(6):297-302.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  42. The association between coronary arterial dominancy and extent of coronary artery disease in angiography and paraclinical studies. Clin Anat. 2008 Sep; 21(6):519-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  43. In-hospital and late clinical outcomes of direct stenting strategy versus stenting after predilatation for the treatment of coronary artery lesions. Indian Heart J. 2008 Jul-Aug; 60(4):318-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  44. Clinical outcomes of drug-eluting stents compared with bare metal stents in our routine clinical practice. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2008 May-Jun; 49(3):132-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  45. Short- and long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with low, intermediate and high ejection fraction. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2008 Jan-Feb; 19(1):17-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  46. Comparison of outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention on proximal versus non-proximal left anterior descending coronary artery, proximal left circumflex, and proximal right coronary artery: a cross-sectional study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2007 Mar 04; 7:7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  47. Outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction at Tehran Heart Center. Med Princ Pract. 2007; 16(5):333-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.