DAVID ALLISON to Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID ALLISON has written about Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic.
Connection Strength
6.777
-
Individually randomized trial mislabeled as a cluster-randomized trial. Comment on: "Effectiveness of wearable technology to optimize youth soccer players' off-training behaviour and training responses: a cluster-randomized trial". Sci Med Footb. 2024 08; 8(3):291.
Score: 0.568
-
Data anomalies and apparent reporting errors in 'Randomized controlled trial testing weight loss and abdominal obesity outcomes of moxibustion'. Biomed Eng Online. 2020 Feb 18; 19(1):11.
Score: 0.458
-
Trial Characteristics and Appropriateness of Statistical Methods Applied for Design and Analysis of Randomized School-Based Studies Addressing Weight-Related Issues: A Literature Review. J Obes. 2018; 2018:8767315.
Score: 0.408
-
Randomization to randomization probability: Estimating treatment effects under actual conditions of use. Psychol Methods. 2018 Jun; 23(2):337-350.
Score: 0.376
-
Rigorous control conditions diminish treatment effects in weight loss-randomized controlled trials. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 06; 40(6):895-8.
Score: 0.338
-
Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: designing, analyzing, and reporting cluster randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Aug; 102(2):241-8.
Score: 0.330
-
Association of run-in periods with weight loss in obesity randomized controlled trials. Obes Rev. 2014 Jan; 15(1):68-73.
Score: 0.294
-
Getting carried away: a note showing baseline observation carried forward (BOCF) results can be calculated from published complete-cases results. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Jun; 36(6):886-9.
Score: 0.246
-
Missing data in randomized clinical trials for weight loss: scope of the problem, state of the field, and performance of statistical methods. PLoS One. 2009 Aug 13; 4(8):e6624.
Score: 0.221
-
Sample size in obesity trials: patient perspective versus current practice. Med Decis Making. 2010 Jan-Feb; 30(1):68-75.
Score: 0.221
-
Industry funding and the reporting quality of large long-term weight loss trials. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008 Oct; 32(10):1531-6.
Score: 0.206
-
Ambiguity in Statistical Analysis Methods and Nonconformity With Prespecified Commitment to Data Sharing in a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2024 04 03; 26:e54090.
Score: 0.152
-
One Cluster per Condition Is Not a Valid Design in Cluster-Randomized Trials. Comment on Wang et al. The Effect of Different Physical Exercise Programs on Physical Fitness among Preschool Children: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 4254. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 08 29; 20(17).
Score: 0.146
-
Undisclosed outcome switching, undisclosed analysis switching, inappropriate rounding, and selective reporting render paper "Effectiveness of a minimally processed food-based nutritional counselling intervention on weight gain in overweight pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial" unreliable. Eur J Nutr. 2023 08; 62(5):2333-2335.
Score: 0.143
-
Comment on Qiu et al. Effect of Protein-Rich Breakfast on Subsequent Energy Intake and Subjective Appetite in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2840. Nutrients. 2023 Mar 29; 15(7).
Score: 0.142
-
Inappropriate Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Due to Not Accounting for Nesting and Clustering: Comment on "A Home-Based Dyadic Music-with-Movement Intervention for People with Dementia and Caregivers: A Hybrid Type 2 Cluster-Randomized Effectiveness-Implementation Design" [Letter]. Clin Interv Aging. 2023; 18:141-142.
Score: 0.140
-
Incorrectly Labeled Randomized Study and Inappropriate Within-Group Comparisons in: "Effectiveness of Home Gardening in Improving Food Security and Health in Chacraseca, Nicaragua: A Pilot Study". J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2023 02; 34(1):510-512.
Score: 0.140
-
Mixed Random and Nonrandom Allocation, and Group Randomization Have Been Mislabeled and Misanalysed, Necessitating Reanalysis. Comment on Conner et al. KiwiC for Vitality: Results of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial Testing the Effects of Kiwifruit or Vitamin C Tablets on Vitality in Adults with Low Vitamin C Levels. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2898. Nutrients. 2022 Sep 30; 14(19).
Score: 0.137
-
A practical decision tree to support editorial adjudication of submitted parallel cluster randomized controlled trials. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2022 03; 30(3):565-570.
Score: 0.132
-
Exercise Trials in Pediatric Brain Tumor: A Systematic Review of Randomized Studies. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2021 03 01; 43(2):59-67.
Score: 0.123
-
Calculation and data errors require correcting. Comment on "The effect of green coffee extract supplementation on anthropometric measures in adults: A comprehensive systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials". Complement Ther Med. 2021 05; 58:102685.
Score: 0.123
-
Completeness of Intervention Reporting of Clinical Trials Published in Highly Ranked Obesity Journals. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2021 02; 29(2):285-293.
Score: 0.121
-
Errors in Meta-Analysis Should Be Corrected: Comment on "Effects of a Paleolithic Diet on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials". Adv Nutr. 2020 07 01; 11(4):1047-1048.
Score: 0.117
-
Cannabinoids and an anti-inflammatory diet for the treatment of neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury (The CATNP Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Spinal Cord. 2021 Feb; 59(2):112-122.
Score: 0.117
-
Incorrect Analyses of Cluster-Randomized Trials that Do Not Take Clustering and Nesting into Account Likely Lead to p-Values that Are Too Small. Child Obes. 2020 03; 16(2):65-66.
Score: 0.115
-
The Implementation of Randomization Requires Corrected Analyses. Comment on ?Comprehensive Nutritional and Dietary Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorder?A Randomized, Controlled 12-Month Trial, Nutrients Nutrients 2018, 10, 369? Nutrients. 2019 05 21; 11(5).
Score: 0.109
-
The development of scientific evidence for health policies for obesity: why and how? Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 06; 41(6):840-848.
Score: 0.093
-
Regression to the Mean: A Commonly Overlooked and Misunderstood Factor Leading to Unjustified Conclusions in Pediatric Obesity Research. Child Obes. 2016 Apr; 12(2):155-8.
Score: 0.087
-
Introduction to the series "Best (but Oft-Forgotten) Practices". Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Aug; 102(2):239-40.
Score: 0.083
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the impact of sleep duration on adiposity and components of energy balance. Obes Rev. 2015 Sep; 16(9):771-82.
Score: 0.083
-
Packet randomized experiments for eliminating classes of confounders. Eur J Clin Invest. 2015 Jan; 45(1):45-55.
Score: 0.080
-
Predicting adult weight change in the real world: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for compensatory changes in energy intake or expenditure. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Aug; 39(8):1181-7.
Score: 0.079
-
Increased fruit and vegetable intake has no discernible effect on weight loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Aug; 100(2):567-76.
Score: 0.077
-
Belief beyond the evidence: using the proposed effect of breakfast on obesity to show 2 practices that distort scientific evidence. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Nov; 98(5):1298-308.
Score: 0.073
-
Is funding source related to study reporting quality in obesity or nutrition randomized control trials in top-tier medical journals? Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Jul; 36(7):977-81.
Score: 0.064
-
Meta-analysis of studies of a specific delivery mode for a modified-carbohydrate diet. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2011 Dec; 24(6):525-35.
Score: 0.064
-
Nutritively sweetened beverage consumption and body weight: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized experiments. Obes Rev. 2011 May; 12(5):346-65.
Score: 0.062
-
Is dietary fat "fattening"? A comprehensive research synthesis. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010 Sep; 50(8):699-715.
Score: 0.059
-
Understanding the relationship between baseline BMI and subsequent weight change in antipsychotic trials: effect modification or regression to the mean? Psychiatry Res. 2009 Dec 30; 170(2-3):172-6.
Score: 0.056
-
Drugs associated with more suicidal ideations are also associated with more suicide attempts. PLoS One. 2009 Oct 02; 4(10):e7312.
Score: 0.056
-
Combination therapy for obesity and metabolic disease. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2009 Oct; 16(5):353-8.
Score: 0.056
-
Breastfeeding and Once-Daily Small-Volume Formula Supplementation to Prevent Infant Growth Impairment. Pediatrics. 2024 Jan 01; 153(1).
Score: 0.037
-
Efficacy and safety of a specific commercial high-protein meal-replacement product line in weight management: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2022; 62(3):798-809.
Score: 0.030
-
A critical examination of the evidence relating high fructose corn syrup and weight gain. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2007; 47(6):561-82.
Score: 0.012