Header Logo

Connection

DAVID ALLISON to Energy Intake

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID ALLISON has written about Energy Intake.
DAVID ALLISON
Connection Strength
7.066
Energy Intake
  1. Does exclusion of extreme reporters of energy intake (the "Goldberg cutoffs") reliably reduce or eliminate bias in nutrition studies? Analysis with illustrative associations of energy intake with health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 11 01; 110(5):1231-1239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.548
  2. Social status and energy intake: a randomized controlled experiment. Clin Obes. 2017 Oct; 7(5):316-322.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.465
  3. Observational research rigour alone does not justify causal inference. Eur J Clin Invest. 2016 Dec; 46(12):985-993.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.445
  4. The effects of experimentally manipulated social status on acute eating behavior: A randomized, crossover pilot study. Physiol Behav. 2016 Aug 01; 162:93-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.429
  5. An unjustified conclusion from self-report-based estimates of energy intake. Am J Med. 2014 Dec; 127(12):e33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.390
  6. Order of magnitude misestimation of weight effects of children's meal policy proposals. Child Obes. 2014 Dec; 10(6):542-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.390
  7. Predicting adult weight change in the real world: a systematic review and meta-analysis accounting for compensatory changes in energy intake or expenditure. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Aug; 39(8):1181-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.387
  8. Liquid calories, energy compensation and weight: what we know and what we still need to learn. Br J Nutr. 2014 Feb; 111(3):384-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.362
  9. Will reducing sugar-sweetened beverage consumption reduce obesity? Evidence supporting conjecture is strong, but evidence when testing effect is weak. Obes Rev. 2013 Aug; 14(8):620-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.352
  10. Self-report-based estimates of energy intake offer an inadequate basis for scientific conclusions. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jun; 97(6):1413-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.351
  11. Randomized controlled trial of the Medifast 5 & 1 Plan for weight loss. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Dec; 37(12):1571-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.348
  12. Myths, presumptions, and facts about obesity. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31; 368(5):446-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.344
  13. Benefits of calorie restriction in mice are mediated via energy imbalance, not absolute energy or protein intake. Geroscience. 2024 Oct; 46(5):4809-4826.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  14. Familial aggregation of energy intake in children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 May; 79(5):844-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.187
  15. Comment on Qiu et al. Effect of Protein-Rich Breakfast on Subsequent Energy Intake and Subjective Appetite in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2840. Nutrients. 2023 Mar 29; 15(7).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  16. Effectiveness of lactation cookies on human milk production rates: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 05; 117(5):1035-1042.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  17. A randomized cross-over trial to determine the effect of a protein vs. carbohydrate preload on energy balance in ad libitum settings. Nutr J. 2019 11 09; 18(1):69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  18. Subjective social status is associated with compensation for large meals - A prospective pilot study. Appetite. 2019 01 01; 132:249-256.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  19. We Agree That Self-Reported Energy Intake Should Not Be Used as a Basis for Conclusions about Energy Intake in Scientific Research. J Nutr. 2016 05; 146(5):1141-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  20. The calorie: myth, measurement, and reality. Am J Clin Nutr. 1995 11; 62(5 Suppl):1034S-1041S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  21. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the impact of sleep duration on adiposity and components of energy balance. Obes Rev. 2015 Sep; 16(9):771-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  22. Response to 'Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing'. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Jul; 39(7):1175-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  23. Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Jul; 39(7):1109-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  24. Belief beyond the evidence: using the proposed effect of breakfast on obesity to show 2 practices that distort scientific evidence. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Nov; 98(5):1298-308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  25. Effects of risperidone on energy balance in female C57BL/6J mice. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Sep; 21(9):1850-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  26. Caloric compensation and eating in the absence of hunger in 5- to 12-y-old weight-discordant siblings. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Sep; 96(3):574-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  27. A twin study of self-regulatory eating in early childhood: estimates of genetic and environmental influence, and measurement considerations. Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Jul; 36(7):931-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  28. Is dietary fat "fattening"? A comprehensive research synthesis. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2010 Sep; 50(8):699-715.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  29. Dietary restraint and disinhibition do not affect accuracy of 24-hour recall in a multiethnic population. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Mar; 106(3):434-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  30. Caloric restriction and body weight independently affect longevity in Wistar rats. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Mar; 28(3):357-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  31. A novel soy-based meal replacement formula for weight loss among obese individuals: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003 Apr; 57(4):514-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  32. Weight loss causes increased mortality: cons. Obes Rev. 2003 Feb; 4(1):9-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  33. Project Grow-2-Gether: a study of the genetic and environmental influences on child eating and obesity. Twin Res. 2002 Oct; 5(5):472-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  34. Dietary R, S-1,3-butanediol diacetoacetate reduces body weight and adiposity in obese mice fed a high-fat diet. FASEB J. 2019 02; 33(2):2409-2421.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  35. Portion sizes for children are predicted by parental characteristics and the amounts parents serve themselves. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Apr; 99(4):763-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  36. Home-schooled children are thinner, leaner, and report better diets relative to traditionally schooled children. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Feb; 22(2):497-503.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  37. Evidence of commingling in human eating behavior. Obes Res. 1993 Sep; 1(5):339-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  38. No effect of dietary fat on short-term weight gain in mice treated with atypical antipsychotic drugs. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Jun; 31(6):1014-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  39. Reduced risk of liver-function-test abnormalities and new gallstone formation with weight loss on 3350-kJ (800-kcal) formula diets. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994 Aug; 60(2):249-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.