DAVID ALLISON to Reproducibility of Results
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID ALLISON has written about Reproducibility of Results.
Connection Strength
1.729
-
Adjusting for covariates representing potential confounders, mediators, or competing predictors in the presence of measurement error: Dispelling a potential misapprehension and insights for optimal study design with nutritional epidemiology examples. F1000Res. 2024; 13:827.
Score: 0.143
-
Hidden: A Baker's Dozen Ways in Which Research Reporting is Less Transparent than it Could be and Suggestions for Implementing Einstein's Dictum. Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 10 16; 30(6):48.
Score: 0.138
-
Randomization, design and analysis for interdependency in aging research: no person or mouse is an island. Nat Aging. 2022 12; 2(12):1101-1111.
Score: 0.121
-
Persistent confusion in nutrition and obesity research about the validity of classic nonparametric tests in the presence of heteroscedasticity: evidence of the problem and valid alternatives. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 03 11; 113(3):517-524.
Score: 0.107
-
Improving open and rigorous science: ten key future research opportunities related to rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research. F1000Res. 2020; 9:1235.
Score: 0.104
-
Does exclusion of extreme reporters of energy intake (the "Goldberg cutoffs") reliably reduce or eliminate bias in nutrition studies? Analysis with illustrative associations of energy intake with health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 11 01; 110(5):1231-1239.
Score: 0.098
-
Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 03 13; 115(11):2563-2570.
Score: 0.087
-
Scientific rigor and credibility in the nutrition research landscape. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 03 01; 107(3):484-494.
Score: 0.087
-
Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors. Nature. 2016 Feb 04; 530(7588):27-9.
Score: 0.075
-
The importance of prediction model validation and assessment in obesity and nutrition research. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 06; 40(6):887-94.
Score: 0.074
-
Randomized controlled trial examining expectancy effects on the accuracy of weight measurement. Clin Obes. 2015 Feb; 5(1):38-41.
Score: 0.070
-
Self-report-based estimates of energy intake offer an inadequate basis for scientific conclusions. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jun; 97(6):1413-5.
Score: 0.063
-
Childhood obesity as a risk factor for bone fracture: a mechanistic study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Jul; 21(7):1459-66.
Score: 0.063
-
Air-displacement plethysmography pediatric option in 2-6 years old using the four-compartment model as a criterion method. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 Aug; 20(8):1732-7.
Score: 0.058
-
Use of causal language in observational studies of obesity and nutrition. Obes Facts. 2010 Dec; 3(6):353-6.
Score: 0.053
-
Rank-based inverse normal transformations are increasingly used, but are they merited? Behav Genet. 2009 Sep; 39(5):580-95.
Score: 0.048
-
Epistemological issues in omics and high-dimensional biology: give the people what they want. Physiol Genomics. 2006 Dec 13; 28(1):24-32.
Score: 0.039
-
Optimal allocation of replicates for measurement evaluation studies. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2006 Aug; 4(3):196-202.
Score: 0.039
-
The PowerAtlas: a power and sample size atlas for microarray experimental design and research. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 22; 7:84.
Score: 0.038
-
Towards sound epistemological foundations of statistical methods for high-dimensional biology. Nat Genet. 2004 Sep; 36(9):943-7.
Score: 0.034
-
Nonreplication in genetic association studies of obesity and diabetes research. J Nutr. 2003 Nov; 133(11):3323-6.
Score: 0.032
-
Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans: demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias. Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Mar; 70(3):575-85.
Score: 0.029
-
Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 04; 25(2):327-355.
Score: 0.023
-
Predicting treatment attendance and weight loss: assessing the psychometric properties and predictive validity of the Dieting Readiness Test. J Pers Assess. 1997 Feb; 68(1):173-83.
Score: 0.020
-
Reproducibility of the QT-variability index in individuals with spinal cord injury. Auton Neurosci. 2016 Feb; 195:16-9.
Score: 0.019
-
Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Jul; 39(7):1109-13.
Score: 0.017
-
The geographic distribution of obesity in the US and the potential regional differences in misreporting of obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Jan; 22(1):300-6.
Score: 0.016
-
Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses. Nat Genet. 2009 Feb; 41(2):149-55.
Score: 0.011
-
Dietary restraint and disinhibition do not affect accuracy of 24-hour recall in a multiethnic population. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Mar; 106(3):434-7.
Score: 0.009
-
Catechol-O-methyl-transferase functional polymorphism and nicotine dependence: an evaluation of nonreplicated results. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jun; 14(6):1384-9.
Score: 0.009
-
Body mass index as a measure of adiposity among children and adolescents: a validation study. J Pediatr. 1998 Feb; 132(2):204-10.
Score: 0.005