Connection

DAVID ALLISON to Reproducibility of Results

This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID ALLISON has written about Reproducibility of Results.
Connection Strength

1.426
  1. Randomization, design and analysis for interdependency in aging research: no person or mouse is an island. Nat Aging. 2022 12; 2(12):1101-1111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  2. Persistent confusion in nutrition and obesity research about the validity of classic nonparametric tests in the presence of heteroscedasticity: evidence of the problem and valid alternatives. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 03 11; 113(3):517-524.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  3. Improving open and rigorous science: ten key future research opportunities related to rigor, reproducibility, and transparency in scientific research. F1000Res. 2020; 9:1235.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  4. Does exclusion of extreme reporters of energy intake (the "Goldberg cutoffs") reliably reduce or eliminate bias in nutrition studies? Analysis with illustrative associations of energy intake with health outcomes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 11 01; 110(5):1231-1239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  5. Issues with data and analyses: Errors, underlying themes, and potential solutions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 03 13; 115(11):2563-2570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  6. Scientific rigor and credibility in the nutrition research landscape. Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 03 01; 107(3):484-494.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  7. Reproducibility: A tragedy of errors. Nature. 2016 Feb 04; 530(7588):27-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  8. The importance of prediction model validation and assessment in obesity and nutrition research. Int J Obes (Lond). 2016 06; 40(6):887-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  9. Randomized controlled trial examining expectancy effects on the accuracy of weight measurement. Clin Obes. 2015 Feb; 5(1):38-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  10. Self-report-based estimates of energy intake offer an inadequate basis for scientific conclusions. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jun; 97(6):1413-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  11. Childhood obesity as a risk factor for bone fracture: a mechanistic study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Jul; 21(7):1459-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  12. Air-displacement plethysmography pediatric option in 2-6 years old using the four-compartment model as a criterion method. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2012 Aug; 20(8):1732-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  13. Use of causal language in observational studies of obesity and nutrition. Obes Facts. 2010 Dec; 3(6):353-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  14. Rank-based inverse normal transformations are increasingly used, but are they merited? Behav Genet. 2009 Sep; 39(5):580-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  15. Epistemological issues in omics and high-dimensional biology: give the people what they want. Physiol Genomics. 2006 Dec 13; 28(1):24-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  16. Optimal allocation of replicates for measurement evaluation studies. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics. 2006 Aug; 4(3):196-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  17. The PowerAtlas: a power and sample size atlas for microarray experimental design and research. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 22; 7:84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  18. Towards sound epistemological foundations of statistical methods for high-dimensional biology. Nat Genet. 2004 Sep; 36(9):943-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  19. Nonreplication in genetic association studies of obesity and diabetes research. J Nutr. 2003 Nov; 133(11):3323-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  20. Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans: demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias. Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Mar; 70(3):575-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  21. Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing. Int J Obes (Lond). 2015 Jul; 39(7):1109-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  22. The geographic distribution of obesity in the US and the potential regional differences in misreporting of obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Jan; 22(1):300-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  23. Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses. Nat Genet. 2009 Feb; 41(2):149-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  24. Dietary restraint and disinhibition do not affect accuracy of 24-hour recall in a multiethnic population. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Mar; 106(3):434-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  25. Catechol-O-methyl-transferase functional polymorphism and nicotine dependence: an evaluation of nonreplicated results. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005 Jun; 14(6):1384-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.