DAVID ALLISON to Cluster Analysis
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID ALLISON has written about Cluster Analysis.
Connection Strength
1.457
-
Ignoring Clustering and Nesting Effects Are Invalid Analysis Choices in a Trial with Clustered Data in Trials Testing Causal Effects. Re: "Impact of a Montessori-Based Nutrition Program on Children's Knowledge and Eating Behaviors". J Sch Health. 2023 10; 93(10):964.
Score: 0.193
-
Inappropriate Analysis of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Due to Not Accounting for Nesting and Clustering: Comment on "A Home-Based Dyadic Music-with-Movement Intervention for People with Dementia and Caregivers: A Hybrid Type 2 Cluster-Randomized Effectiveness-Implementation Design" [Letter]. Clin Interv Aging. 2023; 18:141-142.
Score: 0.192
-
Reanalysis Accounting for Clustering and Nesting Overturns Conclusions in: "Watching TV Cooking Programs: Effects on Actual Food Intake Among Children". J Nutr Educ Behav. 2023 02; 55(2):161-163.
Score: 0.191
-
Accounting for the clustering and nesting effects verifies most conclusions. Corrected analysis of: "Randomized nutrient bar supplementation improves exercise-associated changes in plasma metabolome in adolescents and adult family members at cardiometabolic risk". PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0275242.
Score: 0.188
-
Evaluation of the type I error rate when using parametric bootstrap analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial with binary outcomes and a small number of clusters. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Mar; 215:106654.
Score: 0.178
-
Incorrect Analyses of Cluster-Randomized Trials that Do Not Take Clustering and Nesting into Account Likely Lead to p-Values that Are Too Small. Child Obes. 2020 03; 16(2):65-66.
Score: 0.156
-
Trial Characteristics and Appropriateness of Statistical Methods Applied for Design and Analysis of Randomized School-Based Studies Addressing Weight-Related Issues: A Literature Review. J Obes. 2018; 2018:8767315.
Score: 0.139
-
Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: designing, analyzing, and reporting cluster randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Aug; 102(2):241-8.
Score: 0.112
-
Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus. Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Jan; 7(1):55-65.
Score: 0.059
-
Introduction to the series "Best (but Oft-Forgotten) Practices". Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Aug; 102(2):239-40.
Score: 0.028
-
Fruit and vegetable pricing by demographic factors in the Birmingham, Alabama, metropolitan area, 2004-2005. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jul; 7(4):A78.
Score: 0.020