DAVID ALLISON to Computer Simulation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications DAVID ALLISON has written about Computer Simulation.
Connection Strength
2.055
-
Murine genetic models of obesity: type I error rates and the power of commonly used analyses as assessed by plasmode-based simulation. Int J Obes (Lond). 2020 06; 44(6):1440-1449.
Score: 0.523
-
BMI and risk of serious upper body injury following motor vehicle crashes: concordance of real-world and computer-simulated observations. PLoS Med. 2010 Mar 30; 7(3):e1000250.
Score: 0.263
-
Empirical bayes method for incorporating data from multiple genome scans. Hum Hered. 2005; 60(1):36-42.
Score: 0.191
-
Evaluation of the type I error rate when using parametric bootstrap analysis of a cluster randomized controlled trial with binary outcomes and a small number of clusters. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022 Mar; 215:106654.
Score: 0.149
-
Childhood obesity as a risk factor for bone fracture: a mechanistic study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013 Jul; 21(7):1459-66.
Score: 0.082
-
A novel generalized normal distribution for human longevity and other negatively skewed data. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5):e37025.
Score: 0.076
-
Rank-based inverse normal transformations are increasingly used, but are they merited? Behav Genet. 2009 Sep; 39(5):580-95.
Score: 0.062
-
The effect of assortative mating upon genetic association studies: spurious associations and population substructure in the absence of admixture. Behav Genet. 2006 Sep; 36(5):678-86.
Score: 0.051
-
Regional admixture mapping and structured association testing: conceptual unification and an extensible general linear model. PLoS Genet. 2006 Aug 25; 2(8):e137.
Score: 0.051
-
The PowerAtlas: a power and sample size atlas for microarray experimental design and research. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 22; 7:84.
Score: 0.050
-
A proposed metric for assessing the measurement quality of individual microarrays. BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Jan 23; 7:35.
Score: 0.049
-
Microarray data analysis: from disarray to consolidation and consensus. Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Jan; 7(1):55-65.
Score: 0.049
-
New joint covariance- and marginal-based tests for association and linkage for quantitative traits for random and non-random sampling. Genet Epidemiol. 2005 Jan; 28(1):48-57.
Score: 0.046
-
Joint tests for quantitative trait loci in experimental crosses. Genet Sel Evol. 2004 Nov-Dec; 36(6):601-19.
Score: 0.045
-
A simple significance test for quantile regression. Stat Med. 2004 Aug 30; 23(16):2587-97.
Score: 0.045
-
A Bayesian semi-parametric scalar-on-function regression with measurement error using instrumental variables. Stat Med. 2024 09 20; 43(21):4043-4054.
Score: 0.044
-
Bayesian model choice and search strategies for mapping interacting quantitative trait Loci. Genetics. 2003 Oct; 165(2):867-83.
Score: 0.042
-
Stochastic search variable selection for identifying multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics. 2003 Jul; 164(3):1129-38.
Score: 0.041
-
Estimation of sparse functional quantile regression with measurement error: a SIMEX approach. Biostatistics. 2022 10 14; 23(4):1218-1241.
Score: 0.039
-
Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans: demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias. Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Mar; 70(3):575-85.
Score: 0.037
-
Empirical versus theoretical power and type I error (false-positive) rates estimated from real murine aging research data. Cell Rep. 2021 08 17; 36(7):109560.
Score: 0.036
-
Instrumental variable approach to estimating the scalar-on-function regression model with measurement error with application to energy expenditure assessment in childhood obesity. Stat Med. 2019 09 10; 38(20):3764-3781.
Score: 0.031
-
A computational study of injury severity and pattern sustained by overweight drivers in frontal motor vehicle crashes. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2014; 17(9):965-77.
Score: 0.020
-
Weighted multiple hypothesis testing procedures. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol. 2009; 8:Article23.
Score: 0.015
-
Haplotyping methods for pedigrees. Hum Hered. 2009; 67(4):248-66.
Score: 0.015