Connection

STACEY PEREIRA to Female

This is a "connection" page, showing publications STACEY PEREIRA has written about Female.
Connection Strength

0.209
  1. The Need for Diverse Empirical Data to Inform the Use of Polygenic Risk Scores in Prenatal Screening. Am J Bioeth. 2023 03; 23(3):39-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  2. Psychosocial Effect of Newborn Genomic Sequencing on Families in the BabySeq Project: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2021 11 01; 175(11):1132-1141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  3. Perceived Benefits, Risks, and Utility of Newborn Genomic Sequencing in the BabySeq Project. Pediatrics. 2019 01; 143(Suppl 1):S6-S13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  4. Do privacy and security regulations need a status update? Perspectives from an intergenerational survey. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0184525.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  5. Family genetic risk communication and reverse cascade testing in the BabySeq project. Genet Med. 2025 Mar; 27(3):101350.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  6. The BabySeq Project: A clinical trial of genome sequencing in a diverse cohort of infants. Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Oct 03; 111(10):2094-2106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  7. Psychiatric polygenic risk scores: Experience, hope for utility, and concerns among child and adolescent psychiatrists. Psychiatry Res. 2024 Sep; 339:116080.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  8. Public Attitudes, Interests, and Concerns Regarding Polygenic Embryo Screening. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 05 01; 7(5):e2410832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  9. Effects of participation in a U.S. trial of newborn genomic sequencing on parents at risk for depression. J Genet Couns. 2022 02; 31(1):218-229.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  10. Perceptions of best practices for return of results in an international survey of psychiatric genetics researchers. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021 02; 29(2):231-240.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  11. Psychiatric genomics researchers' perspectives on best practices for returning results to individual participants. Genet Med. 2020 02; 22(2):345-352.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  12. Responsibility, culpability, and parental views on genomic testing for seriously ill children. Genet Med. 2019 12; 21(12):2791-2797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  13. Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium. Genome Med. 2019 02 27; 11(1):10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  14. An Ethical Framework for Research in Maternal-Fetal Intervention in the Presence of Maternal Human Immunodeficiency Virus or Hepatitis B and C Infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 01; 133(1):48-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  15. Returning a Genomic Result for an Adult-Onset Condition to the Parents of a Newborn: Insights From the BabySeq Project. Pediatrics. 2019 01; 143(Suppl 1):S37-S43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  16. Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2019 12; 180(8):589-600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  17. Parental interest in genomic sequencing of newborns: enrollment experience from the BabySeq Project. Genet Med. 2019 03; 21(3):622-630.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  18. Personalized genomic disease risk of volunteers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 15; 110(42):16957-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.