Connection

STACEY PEREIRA to Genetic Testing

This is a "connection" page, showing publications STACEY PEREIRA has written about Genetic Testing.
Connection Strength

2.553
  1. Parents' decision-making regarding whether to receive adult-onset only genetic findings for their children: Findings from the BabySeq Project. Genet Med. 2023 03; 25(3):100002.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.521
  2. Commercial Interests, the Technological Imperative, and Advocates: Three Forces Driving Genomic Sequencing in Newborns. Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Jul; 48 Suppl 2:S43-S44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.382
  3. Return of individual genomic research results: what do consent forms tell participants? Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 11; 24(11):1524-1529.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.332
  4. Family genetic risk communication and reverse cascade testing in the BabySeq project. Genet Med. 2025 Mar; 27(3):101350.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  5. Actionability of unanticipated monogenic disease risks in newborn genomic screening: Findings from the BabySeq Project. Am J Hum Genet. 2023 07 06; 110(7):1034-1045.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  6. Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services. Am J Hum Genet. 2022 03 03; 109(3):486-497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  7. Psychiatric genomics researchers' perspectives on best practices for returning results to individual participants. Genet Med. 2020 02; 22(2):345-352.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  8. Responsibility, culpability, and parental views on genomic testing for seriously ill children. Genet Med. 2019 12; 21(12):2791-2797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  9. Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium. Genome Med. 2019 02 27; 11(1):10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  10. Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2019 12; 180(8):589-600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  11. Newborn Sequencing in Genomic Medicine and Public Health. Pediatrics. 2017 Feb; 139(2).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  12. The ethics of conducting molecular autopsies in cases of sudden death in the young. Genome Res. 2016 09; 26(9):1165-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  13. Potential Psychosocial Risks of Sequencing Newborns. Pediatrics. 2016 Jan; 137 Suppl 1:S24-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  14. Adult genetic risk screening. Annu Rev Med. 2014; 65:1-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  15. The BabySeq Project: A clinical trial of genome sequencing in a diverse cohort of infants. Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Oct 03; 111(10):2094-2106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  16. Public Attitudes, Interests, and Concerns Regarding Polygenic Embryo Screening. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 05 01; 7(5):e2410832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  17. Child and adolescent psychiatrists' use, attitudes, and understanding of genetic testing and pharmacogenetics in clinical practice. Psychiatry Res. 2023 07; 325:115246.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  18. Genetic testing in ambulatory cardiology clinics reveals high rate of findings with clinical management implications. Genet Med. 2021 12; 23(12):2404-2414.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  19. Child and Adolescent Psychiatrists' Perceptions of Utility and Self-rated Knowledge of Genetic Testing Predict Usage for Autism Spectrum Disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 06; 60(6):657-660.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  20. Parental interest in genomic sequencing of newborns: enrollment experience from the BabySeq Project. Genet Med. 2019 03; 21(3):622-630.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.