Header Logo

Connection

IBRAHIM KHANSA to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications IBRAHIM KHANSA has written about Humans.
IBRAHIM KHANSA
Connection Strength
0.645
Humans
  1. Discussion: Gearing Effect in Clockwise Rotational Orthognathic Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Oct 01; 154(4):755e-756e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  2. Prospective Evaluation of Health-Related Quality-of-Life in Children with Craniosynostosis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025 Jun; 62(6):970-975.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  3. Commentary on: Short-term Satisfaction, Psychosocial Impact, and Complication Profile of Reduction Mammaplasty During Adolescence. Aesthet Surg J. 2023 06 14; 43(7):NP492-NP493.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  4. Posterior Cranial Distraction in Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024 Aug; 61(8):1302-1307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  5. Airway and Feeding Outcomes in Pierre Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Three Management Strategies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023 06; 60(6):689-694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  6. Letter to the editor regarding: "The use of surgical site drains in breast reconstruction: A systematic review". J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2020 09; 73(9):1775-1784.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  7. Discussion: Greater Occipital Nerve Block for the Treatment of Chronic Migraine Headaches: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 10; 144(4):953-955.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  8. Comment on: Work-Related Musculoskeletal Discomfort and Injury in Microsurgeons. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2019 06; 35(5):e3-e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  9. A Growing Epidemic: Plastic Surgeons and Burnout-A Literature Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 08; 144(2):298e-305e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  10. Reply: Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries in Plastic Surgeons in the United States, Canada, and Norway. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 11; 142(5):812e-813e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  11. Commentary Regarding "Abdominal Wall Reconstruction and Patient Comorbidities". Ann Plast Surg. 2018 10; 81(4):381-382.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  12. Complex Open Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Management of the Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 09; 142(3 Suppl):125S-132S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  13. Optimal Pain Control in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 09; 142(3 Suppl):142S-148S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  14. Optimal Use of Surgical Drains: Evidence-Based Strategies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 06; 141(6):1542-1549.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  15. Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Payer Mix and Physician Reimbursement in Hand Surgery. J Hand Surg Am. 2018 06; 43(6):511-515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  16. Use of antibiotic impregnated resorbable beads reduces pressure ulcer recurrence: A retrospective analysis. Wound Repair Regen. 2018 03; 26(2):221-227.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  17. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries in Plastic Surgeons in the United States, Canada, and Norway. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 01; 141(1):165e-175e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  18. Management of skin and subcutaneous tissue in complex open abdominal wall reconstruction. Hernia. 2018 04; 22(2):293-301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  19. Reply: Evidence-Based Scar Management: How to Improve Results with Technique and Technology. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 06; 139(6):1372e-1373e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  20. Discussion: The Impact of Body Mass Index on Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Outcomes: A Comparative Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 05; 139(5):1245-1247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  21. Airway and Feeding Outcomes of Mandibular Distraction, Tongue-Lip Adhesion, and Conservative Management in Pierre Robin Sequence: A Prospective Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Apr; 139(4):975e-983e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  22. Evidence-Based Scar Management: How to Improve Results with Technique and Technology. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep; 138(3 Suppl):165S-178S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  23. A novel splinting technique to protect flaps of the posterior lower extremity. Microsurgery. 2017 07; 37(5):467-468.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  24. Strategies for Postoperative Seroma Prevention: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jul; 138(1):240-252.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  25. Surgeon Reimbursements in Maxillofacial Trauma Surgery: Effect of the Affordable Care Act in Ohio. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Feb; 137(2):613-618.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  26. Evidence-Based Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: The Maxi-Mini Approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Dec; 136(6):1312-1323.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  27. Maximizing Technological Resources in Plastic Surgery Resident Education. J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Nov; 26(8):2264-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  28. Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty: A Social Media Analysis. Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Jan; 36(1):NP1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  29. Modern reconstructive techniques for abdominal wall defects after oncologic resection. J Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr; 111(5):587-98.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  30. Breast reconstruction with tissue expanders: implementation of a standardized best-practices protocol to reduce infection rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jul; 134(1):11-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  31. Aesthetic outcomes in women undergoing breast-conserving therapy followed by mastectomy and microsurgical reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2015 Jan; 35(1):21-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  32. Timing of prophylactic hysterectomy-oophorectomy, mastectomy, and microsurgical breast reconstruction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Microsurgery. 2014 May; 34(4):271-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  33. A systematic approach to emergent breast free flap takeback: Clinical outcomes, algorithm, and review of the literature. Microsurgery. 2013 Oct; 33(7):505-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  34. Fat necrosis in autologous abdomen-based breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar; 131(3):443-452.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  35. Postmastectomy breast reconstruction after previous lumpectomy and radiation therapy: analysis of complications and satisfaction. Ann Plast Surg. 2011 May; 66(5):444-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  36. Factor V Leiden associated with flap loss in microsurgical breast reconstruction. Microsurgery. 2011 Jul; 31(5):409-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  37. Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Retrorectus Self-Adhering Mesh: A Single-Center Long-Term Follow-Up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 03 01; 151(3):646-650.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  38. A Case Series of the Use of Piezosurgery Instrument for Minimally Invasive Metopic Suturectomy. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 05 13; 20(6):529-534.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  39. Strategies for Mesh Fixation in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: Concepts and Techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 147(2):484-491.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  40. Outcomes in Velopharyngeal Dysfunction Treatment: Comparing Two Approaches for Pharyngeal Flaps. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Nov/Dec; 31(8):2167-2170.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  41. Spring Cranioplasty: Incorporation Into Practice. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Oct; 31(7):2092-2094.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  42. Simultaneous Midface Advancement and Orthognathic Surgery: A Powerful Technique for Managing Midface Hypoplasia and Malocclusion. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 06; 145(6):1067e-1072e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  43. Cost-Effectiveness of Long-Term, Targeted OnabotulinumtoxinA versus Peripheral Trigger Site Deactivation Surgery for the Treatment of Refractory Migraine Headaches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Feb; 145(2):401e-406e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  44. Evidence-Based Strategies for the Prehabilitation of the Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Patient. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 09; 142(3 Suppl):21S-29S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  45. A Formidable Foe Is Sabotaging Your Results: What You Should Know about Biofilms and Wound Healing. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May; 139(5):1184e-1194e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  46. Evidence-Based Strategies to Reduce Postoperative Complications in Plastic Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep; 138(3 Suppl):51S-60S.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  47. Evidence-Based Strategies to Reduce Postoperative Complications in Plastic Surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016 Jan; 137(1):351-360.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  48. Reconstructive Management of Devastating Electrical Injuries to the Face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Oct; 136(4):839-847.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  49. The Current Means for Detection of Migraine Headache Trigger Sites. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Oct; 136(4):860-867.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  50. Processes of Care in Breast Reconstruction and the Long-Term Impact of a Comprehensive Breast Center. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec; 22 Suppl 3:S1256-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  51. Computerized segmentation and measurement of chronic wound images. Comput Biol Med. 2015 May; 60:74-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  52. Analysis of factors contributing to severity of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Ann Plast Surg. 2015 Jan; 74(1):22-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  53. Process outcomes in breast reconstruction and the impact of a comprehensive breast center. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov; 134(5):675e-681e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  54. The differential impact of plastic surgery subspecialties on the financial performance of an academic clinical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Jun; 133(6):748e-755e.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  55. Impact of complications on patient satisfaction in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Apr; 127(4):1428-1436.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.