Connection

LUKASZ SZARPAK to Manikins

This is a "connection" page, showing publications LUKASZ SZARPAK has written about Manikins.
Connection Strength

16.085
  1. Comparison of two infant chest compression techniques during simulated newborn cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by a single rescuer: A randomized, crossover multicenter trial. Cardiol J. 2019; 26(6):761-768.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.572
  2. The impact of a CPRezy? feedback device on the quality of chest compressions performed by nurses. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 07; 36(7):1318-1319.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.543
  3. C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug; 35(8):1142-1146.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.518
  4. The quality of a newly developed infant chest compression method applied by paramedics: a randomised crossover manikin trial. Kardiol Pol. 2017; 75(6):589-595.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.513
  5. Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for intubation performed by novice physicians in a difficult airway scenario. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May; 35(5):796-797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.511
  6. Comparison of two intravascular access techniques when using CBRN-PPE: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun; 34(6):1170-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.483
  7. Comparison of NIO and EZ-IO intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation performed by paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun; 34(6):1166-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.482
  8. Are paramedics able to perform endotracheal intubation with access to the patient through the back seat of the car? Randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun; 34(6):1161-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.482
  9. A comparison of the McGrath-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for child tracheal intubation during resuscitation by paramedics. A randomized, crossover, manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug; 34(8):1338-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.473
  10. Comparison of 4 supraglotttic devices used by paramedics during simulated CPR : a randomized controlled crossover trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug; 33(8):1084-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  11. Video rigid flexing laryngoscope (RIFL) vs Miller laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during pediatric resuscitation by paramedics: a simulation study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug; 33(8):1019-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  12. Comparison of intubation through the McGrath MAC, GlideScope, AirTraq, and Miller Laryngoscope by paramedics during child CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul; 33(7):946-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  13. Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Oct; 174(10):1325-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.453
  14. A randomized comparison of the Laryngoscope with Fiber Optic Reusable Flexible Tip English Macintosh blade to the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation in simulated easy and difficult child airway with chest compression scenarios. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul; 33(7):951-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.453
  15. Intubation of child and infant manikins during resuscitation: does the Venner A.P. Advance video laryngoscope improve the performance of nurses? Crit Care Resusc. 2015 Mar; 17(1):55-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.449
  16. Comparison of infant intubation through the TruView EVO2, TruView PCD, and Miller laryngoscope by paramedics during simulated infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul; 33(7):872-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.448
  17. Comparison of the Pentax, Truview, GlideScope, and the Miller laryngoscope for child intubation during resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar; 33(3):391-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.443
  18. Comparison of 3 video laryngoscopes against the Miller laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during infant resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar; 33(3):460-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  19. Comparison of intravascular access methods applied by nurses wearing personal protective equipment in simulated COVID-19 resuscitation: A randomized crossover simulation trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 11; 49:189-194.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  20. Comparison of 4 Pediatric Intraosseous Access Devices: A Randomized Simulation Study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Oct; 36(10):e568-e572.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  21. Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 04 20; 20(1):90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  22. Comparison of Direct and Video Laryngoscopes during Different Airway Scenarios Performed by Experienced Paramedics: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Study. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:5382739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  23. How should we teach cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Randomized multi-center study. Cardiol J. 2021; 28(3):439-445.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  24. Comparison of Miller laryngoscope and UEScope videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in four pediatric airway scenarios: a randomized, crossover simulation trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun; 178(6):937-945.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  25. Comparison of blind intubation with different supraglottic airway devices by inexperienced physicians in several airway scenarios: a manikin study. Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun; 178(6):871-882.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  26. The effect of chest compression frequency on the quality of resuscitation by lifeguards. A prospective randomized crossover multicenter simulation trial. Cardiol J. 2019; 26(6):769-776.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  27. Comparison of blind intubation via supraglottic airway devices versus standard intubation during different airway emergency scenarios in inexperienced hand: Randomized, crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  28. Which technique for resuscitation physicians should use? Preliminary data. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 04; 37(4):791-792.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  29. Comparison of the UEScope videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized, cross-over, multi-center manikin study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep; 97(36):e12085.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  30. Laryngoscopes for difficult airway scenarios: a comparison of the available devices. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 09; 15(9):631-643.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  31. Novel method of infant chest compression. Does the arrangement of the thumbs matter? Am J Emerg Med. 2019 04; 37(4):769-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  32. Schoolteachers as candidates to be basic life support trainers: A simulation trial. Cardiol J. 2019; 26(5):536-542.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  33. Factors influencing high-quality chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenario, according to 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(3):642-647.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  34. Airtraq Laryngoscope Versus the Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope During Pediatric Intubation Performed by Nurses: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study With Three Airway Scenarios. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Nov; 33(11):735-739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  35. Exchange of supraglottic airways for endotracheal tube using the Eschmann Introducer during simulated child resuscitation: A randomized study comparing 4 devices. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun; 96(26):e7177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  36. A comparison of McGrath MAC? and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  37. Evaluation of a newly developed infant chest compression technique: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr; 96(14):e5915.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  38. Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr; 96(16):e5873.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  39. Comparison of the Intubrite and Macintosh laryngoscopes in a difficult airway scenario. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 06; 35(6):925.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  40. New method of infant chest compression. Authors response. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 05; 35(5):795.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  41. Evaluation of new two-thumb chest compression technique for infant CPR performed by novice physicians. A randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr; 35(4):604-609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  42. Comparison of the Trachway video intubating stylet and Macintosh laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation. Preliminary data. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 04; 35(4):574-575.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  43. Which airways management technique is optimal for trauma patient ventilation? Eur J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec; 23(6):455-456.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  44. The effect of strength training on quality of prolonged basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Kardiol Pol. 2017; 75(1):21-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  45. A comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via I-gel in intubating an entrapped patient: A randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 05; 35(5):787-789.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  46. Comparison of blind intubation through the I-gel and the Air-Q? by novice physicians during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 03; 35(3):509-510.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  47. CPR using the lifeline ARM mechanical chest compression device: a randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan; 35(1):96-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  48. Tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope with and without chest compressions, performed by nurses. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec; 34(12):2448-2449.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  49. Can novice physicians intubate with ETView tube without Macintosh laryngoscope? Preliminary data. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov; 34(11):2242-2243.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  50. Should nurses use mechanical chest compression devices during CPR? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Oct; 34(10):2044-2045.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  51. Does the use of a semirigid stylet increase the efficacy of endotracheal intubation when using an ETView tube? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep; 34(9):1908-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  52. Does the use of a chest compression system in children improve the effectiveness of chest compressions? A randomised crossover simulation pilot study. Kardiol Pol. 2016; 74(12):1499-1504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  53. Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for orotracheal intubation by nurses during resuscitation: preliminary data of a randomized crossover simulation-based study. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug; 34(8):1724-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  54. Randomized crossover comparison of the AirTraq Avant(?) to the Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation with during simulated resuscitation by novice physicians. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug; 34(8):1708-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  55. Comparison of Bone Injection Gun and Jamshidi intraosseous access devices by paramedics with and without chemical-biological-radiological-nuclear personal protective equipment: a randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jul; 34(7):1307-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  56. Which intravascular access method to choose during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun; 34(6):1160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  57. A randomized crossover trial comparing the C-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for face-to-face intubation in a manikin. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 May; 34(5):920-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  58. Comparison of two chest compression techniques when using CBRN-PPE: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 May; 34(5):913-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  59. Does the Venner A.P. Advance video laryngoscope improve success of first intubation attempt of trauma patient? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb; 34(2):315-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  60. Double-lumen tube tracheal intubation in a manikin model using the VivaSight Double Lumen: a randomized controlled comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan; 34(1):103-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  61. Tracheal intubation with a VivaSight-SL endotracheal tube by paramedics in a cervical-immobilized manikin. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb; 34(2):309-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  62. Simulated endotracheal intubation of a patient with cervical spine immobilization during resuscitation: a randomized comparison of the Pentax AWS, the Airtraq, and the McCoy Laryngoscopes. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec; 33(12):1814-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.117
  63. Child endotracheal intubation with a Clarus Levitan fiberoptic stylet vs Macintosh laryngoscope during resuscitation performed by paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov; 33(11):1547-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  64. Pentax Airway Scope AWS-S200 video laryngoscope for child tracheal intubation in a manikin study with 3 airway scenarios. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep; 33(9):1171-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  65. Comparison of Coopdech?, CoPilot?, Intubrite?, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, controlled crossover simulation trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Nov; 174(11):1517-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  66. A comparison of the ETView VivaSight SL against a fiberoptic bronchoscope for nasotracheal intubation of multitrauma patients during resuscitation. A randomized, crossover, manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug; 33(8):1097-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  67. Can BONFILS Intubation Endoscope be an alternative to direct laryngoscopy for pediatric tracheal intubation during resuscitation? Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb; 33(2):293-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  68. Comparison of 3 different intraosseous access devices for adult during resuscitation. Randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec; 32(12):1490-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  69. A randomized crossover comparison of the b?b? VieScope and direct laryngoscope for pediatric airway management by nurses in medical simulation settings. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023 Jul-Dec; 20(11):943-950.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  70. Comparison of the b?b? VieScope? and direct laryngoscope for pediatric tongue oedema scenario: A simulation study. Am J Emerg Med. 2023 07; 69:207-208.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  71. Novel airway device Vie Scope in several pediatric airway scenario: A randomized simulation pilot trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 10; 99(28):e21084.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  72. The TrueCPR device in the process of teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized simulation trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul; 98(27):e15995.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  73. BEST Life-"Bringing ECMO Simulation To Life"-How Medical Simulation Improved a Regional ECMO Program. Artif Organs. 2018 Nov; 42(11):1052-1061.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  74. Development of regional extracorporeal life support system: The importance of innovative simulation training. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 01; 37(1):19-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  75. Is there any alternative to standard chest compression techniques in infants? A randomized manikin trial of the new "2-thumb-fist" option. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb; 97(5):e9386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  76. Which position should we take during newborn resuscitation? A prospective, randomised, multicentre simulation trial. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(6):980-986.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  77. The impact of the use of a CPRMeter monitor on quality of chest compressions: a prospective randomised trial, cross-simulation. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(3):574-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  78. Which position for resuscitation should we take? A randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 May; 36(5):899-900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  79. ET-View compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017; 49(4):274-282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  80. Comparison of four laryngoscopes in cervical immobilization scenario. Pilot data. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 05; 36(5):890-891.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  81. Comparison of four different intraosseous access devices during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A randomized crossover manikin trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jul; 176(7):865-871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  82. A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct; 35(10):1420-1425.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  83. Pressure on the incisors during direct laryngoscopy and intubation using the Shikani Optical Stylet?. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 09; 35(9):1370-1372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  84. The LMA Fastrach? as a conduit for endotracheal intubation during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 07; 35(7):1020-1021.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  85. Comparison between the TrueView EVO2 PCD and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation performed by paramedics: Preliminary data. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 05; 35(5):789-790.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  86. Comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via the iGEL for Intubation With C-spine immobilization: A Randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar; 35(3):484-487.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  87. Are nurses able to perform blind intubation? Randomized comparison of I-gel and laryngeal mask airway. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 05; 35(5):786-787.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  88. Success of intraosseous access procedure in simulated adult resuscitation. Crit Care Resusc. 2016 Jun; 18(2):134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  89. Are paramedics prepared to perform needle cricothyroidotomy? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jul; 34(7):1310-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  90. Comparison of the VivaSight single lumen endotracheal tube and the Macintosh laryngoscope for emergency intubation by experienced paramedics in a standardized airway manikin with restricted access: a randomized, crossover trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 May; 34(5):929-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  91. Mechanical chest compression with the LifeLine ARM device during simulated CPR. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 May; 34(5):917.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  92. Randomized trial of the chest compressions effectiveness comparing 3 feedback CPR devices and standard basic life support by nurses. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar; 34(3):381-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  93. Comparison of exchange of laryngeal mask airway and Igel for tracheal tube using Eschmann Tracheal Tube Introducer during simulated resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan; 34(1):106-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  94. Can the ETView VivaSight SL Rival Conventional Intubation Using the Macintosh Laryngoscope During Adult Resuscitation by Novice Physicians?: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May; 94(21):e850.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  95. Comparison of direct intubation and Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (S.A.L.T.) for endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Randomized manikin study. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015; 47(3):195-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.