LUKASZ SZARPAK to Intubation, Intratracheal
This is a "connection" page, showing publications LUKASZ SZARPAK has written about Intubation, Intratracheal.
Connection Strength
23.989
-
Comparison of Vie Scope? and Macintosh laryngoscopes for intubation during resuscitation by paramedics wearing personal protective equipment. Am J Emerg Med. 2022 03; 53:122-126.
Score: 0.600
-
How healthcare must respond to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in invasively mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 10; 48:361-362.
Score: 0.563
-
Suction above cuff endotracheal tube can reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in COVID-19 patients. Adv Respir Med. 2021; 89(1):97-98.
Score: 0.559
-
Vie scope? laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope with personal protective equipment during intubation of COVID-19 resuscitation patient. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 08; 46:788-789.
Score: 0.547
-
Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 04 20; 20(1):90.
Score: 0.533
-
Comparison of Miller laryngoscope and UEScope videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in four pediatric airway scenarios: a randomized, crossover simulation trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun; 178(6):937-945.
Score: 0.496
-
Comparison of blind intubation with different supraglottic airway devices by inexperienced physicians in several airway scenarios: a manikin study. Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun; 178(6):871-882.
Score: 0.494
-
Laryngoscopes for difficult airway scenarios: a comparison of the available devices. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 09; 15(9):631-643.
Score: 0.475
-
Airtraq Laryngoscope Versus the Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope During Pediatric Intubation Performed by Nurses: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study With Three Airway Scenarios. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Nov; 33(11):735-739.
Score: 0.449
-
Does VideoStylet improve the effectiveness of endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec; 35(12):1981-1982.
Score: 0.438
-
Exchange of supraglottic airways for endotracheal tube using the Eschmann Introducer during simulated child resuscitation: A randomized study comparing 4 devices. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun; 96(26):e7177.
Score: 0.436
-
A comparison of McGrath MAC? and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jun; 176(6):779-786.
Score: 0.433
-
Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr; 96(16):e5873.
Score: 0.431
-
C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug; 35(8):1142-1146.
Score: 0.430
-
Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for intubation performed by novice physicians in a difficult airway scenario. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May; 35(5):796-797.
Score: 0.424
-
Comparison of the Trachway video intubating stylet and Macintosh laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation. Preliminary data. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 04; 35(4):574-575.
Score: 0.422
-
A comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via I-gel in intubating an entrapped patient: A randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 05; 35(5):787-789.
Score: 0.421
-
Comparison of blind intubation through the I-gel and the Air-Q? by novice physicians during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 03; 35(3):509-510.
Score: 0.420
-
A comparison of a traditional endotracheal tube versus ETView SL in endotracheal intubation during different emergency conditions: A randomized, crossover cadaver trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5170.
Score: 0.419
-
Tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope with and without chest compressions, performed by nurses. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec; 34(12):2448-2449.
Score: 0.415
-
Can novice physicians intubate with ETView tube without Macintosh laryngoscope? Preliminary data. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov; 34(11):2242-2243.
Score: 0.414
-
A comparison of GlideScope and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation performed by nurses. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Oct; 34(10):2041.
Score: 0.411
-
Does the use of a semirigid stylet increase the efficacy of endotracheal intubation when using an ETView tube? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep; 34(9):1908-9.
Score: 0.410
-
Comparison of endotracheal intubation performed with 3 devices by paramedics wearing chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear personal protective equipment. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 09; 34(9):1902-3.
Score: 0.409
-
Ability of paramedics to perform endotracheal intubation during continuous chest compressions: a randomized cadaver study comparing Pentax AWS and Macintosh laryngoscopes. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep; 34(9):1835-9.
Score: 0.408
-
Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for orotracheal intubation by nurses during resuscitation: preliminary data of a randomized crossover simulation-based study. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug; 34(8):1724-5.
Score: 0.408
-
Randomized crossover comparison of the AirTraq Avant(?) to the Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation with during simulated resuscitation by novice physicians. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug; 34(8):1708-9.
Score: 0.407
-
Are paramedics able to perform endotracheal intubation with access to the patient through the back seat of the car? Randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun; 34(6):1161-3.
Score: 0.400
-
A randomized crossover trial comparing the C-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for face-to-face intubation in a manikin. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 May; 34(5):920-2.
Score: 0.398
-
Are paramedics able to confirm endotracheal tube placement using ultrasonography? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 May; 34(5):923-4.
Score: 0.398
-
Fiberoptic intubation or video tube for trauma patient intubation--which method to choose? Randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Apr; 34(4):751-3.
Score: 0.397
-
A comparison of the McGrath-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for child tracheal intubation during resuscitation by paramedics. A randomized, crossover, manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug; 34(8):1338-41.
Score: 0.392
-
Does the Venner A.P. Advance video laryngoscope improve success of first intubation attempt of trauma patient? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb; 34(2):315-6.
Score: 0.391
-
Double-lumen tube tracheal intubation in a manikin model using the VivaSight Double Lumen: a randomized controlled comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan; 34(1):103-4.
Score: 0.390
-
Tracheal intubation with a VivaSight-SL endotracheal tube by paramedics in a cervical-immobilized manikin. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb; 34(2):309-10.
Score: 0.390
-
Simulated endotracheal intubation of a patient with cervical spine immobilization during resuscitation: a randomized comparison of the Pentax AWS, the Airtraq, and the McCoy Laryngoscopes. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec; 33(12):1814-7.
Score: 0.388
-
Child endotracheal intubation with a Clarus Levitan fiberoptic stylet vs Macintosh laryngoscope during resuscitation performed by paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov; 33(11):1547-51.
Score: 0.380
-
Laryngoscopic options for pediatric intubation during CPR-the authors respond. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep; 33(9):1312-3.
Score: 0.379
-
Pentax Airway Scope AWS-S200 video laryngoscope for child tracheal intubation in a manikin study with 3 airway scenarios. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep; 33(9):1171-4.
Score: 0.379
-
Comparison of Coopdech?, CoPilot?, Intubrite?, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, controlled crossover simulation trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Nov; 174(11):1517-23.
Score: 0.379
-
Video rigid flexing laryngoscope (RIFL) vs Miller laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during pediatric resuscitation by paramedics: a simulation study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug; 33(8):1019-24.
Score: 0.377
-
Comparison of intubation through the McGrath MAC, GlideScope, AirTraq, and Miller Laryngoscope by paramedics during child CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul; 33(7):946-50.
Score: 0.377
-
Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Oct; 174(10):1325-32.
Score: 0.376
-
A randomized comparison of the Laryngoscope with Fiber Optic Reusable Flexible Tip English Macintosh blade to the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation in simulated easy and difficult child airway with chest compression scenarios. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul; 33(7):951-6.
Score: 0.376
-
Intubation of child and infant manikins during resuscitation: does the Venner A.P. Advance video laryngoscope improve the performance of nurses? Crit Care Resusc. 2015 Mar; 17(1):55-6.
Score: 0.373
-
Comparison of infant intubation through the TruView EVO2, TruView PCD, and Miller laryngoscope by paramedics during simulated infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul; 33(7):872-5.
Score: 0.372
-
Can GlideScope? videolaryngoscope be an alternative to direct laryngoscopy for child and infant tracheal intubation during chest compression? Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Jul; 174(7):981-2.
Score: 0.371
-
Comparison of the Pentax, Truview, GlideScope, and the Miller laryngoscope for child intubation during resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar; 33(3):391-5.
Score: 0.368
-
Comparison of 3 video laryngoscopes against the Miller laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during infant resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar; 33(3):460-1.
Score: 0.367
-
Simulation of blind tracheal intubation during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec 01; 190(11):1315.
Score: 0.367
-
Can BONFILS Intubation Endoscope be an alternative to direct laryngoscopy for pediatric tracheal intubation during resuscitation? Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb; 33(2):293-4.
Score: 0.365
-
Ventilation with the esophageal-tracheal Combitube during general anaesthesia: assessing complications in 540 patients. Ups J Med Sci. 2023; 128.
Score: 0.164
-
Novel airway device Vie Scope in several pediatric airway scenario: A randomized simulation pilot trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 10; 99(28):e21084.
Score: 0.135
-
Airway management and ventilation principles in COVID-19 patients. J Clin Anesth. 2020 10; 65:109877.
Score: 0.134
-
Comparison of blind intubation via supraglottic airway devices versus standard intubation during different airway emergency scenarios in inexperienced hand: Randomized, crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12593.
Score: 0.120
-
Thyromental height test as a new method for prediction of difficult intubation with double lumen tube. PLoS One. 2018; 13(9):e0201944.
Score: 0.119
-
Degree of obesity is not associated with more than one intubation attempt: a large centre experience. Br J Anaesth. 2018 May; 120(5):1110-1116.
Score: 0.115
-
The authors responds on comparing Macintosh and Miller Laryngoscopes during Pediatric Resuscitation". Am J Emerg Med. 2018 06; 36(6):1099.
Score: 0.115
-
ET-View compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017; 49(4):274-282.
Score: 0.111
-
Comparison of four laryngoscopes in cervical immobilization scenario. Pilot data. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 05; 36(5):890-891.
Score: 0.111
-
Inter-center comparison of EasyTube and endotracheal tube during general anesthesia in minor elective surgery. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0178756.
Score: 0.109
-
Comparison of the Intubrite and Macintosh laryngoscopes in a difficult airway scenario. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 06; 35(6):925.
Score: 0.108
-
Pressure on the incisors during direct laryngoscopy and intubation using the Shikani Optical Stylet?. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 09; 35(9):1370-1372.
Score: 0.107
-
Which airways management technique is optimal for trauma patient ventilation? Eur J Emerg Med. 2016 Dec; 23(6):455-456.
Score: 0.105
-
Comparison between the TrueView EVO2 PCD and direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation performed by paramedics: Preliminary data. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 05; 35(5):789-790.
Score: 0.105
-
Comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via the iGEL for Intubation With C-spine immobilization: A Randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar; 35(3):484-487.
Score: 0.105
-
Are nurses able to perform blind intubation? Randomized comparison of I-gel and laryngeal mask airway. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 05; 35(5):786-787.
Score: 0.105
-
Videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy for child tracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 12; 34(12):2453.
Score: 0.104
-
Comparison of the VivaSight single lumen endotracheal tube and the Macintosh laryngoscope for emergency intubation by experienced paramedics in a standardized airway manikin with restricted access: a randomized, crossover trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 May; 34(5):929-30.
Score: 0.100
-
Comparison of exchange of laryngeal mask airway and Igel for tracheal tube using Eschmann Tracheal Tube Introducer during simulated resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan; 34(1):106-7.
Score: 0.098
-
A comparison of the ETView VivaSight SL against a fiberoptic bronchoscope for nasotracheal intubation of multitrauma patients during resuscitation. A randomized, crossover, manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug; 33(8):1097-9.
Score: 0.094
-
Can the ETView VivaSight SL Rival Conventional Intubation Using the Macintosh Laryngoscope During Adult Resuscitation by Novice Physicians?: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May; 94(21):e850.
Score: 0.094
-
Comparison of direct intubation and Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (S.A.L.T.) for endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Randomized manikin study. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015; 47(3):195-9.
Score: 0.092
-
A randomized crossover comparison of the b?b? VieScope and direct laryngoscope for pediatric airway management by nurses in medical simulation settings. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023 Jul-Dec; 20(11):943-950.
Score: 0.042
-
Comparison of the b?b? VieScope? and direct laryngoscope for pediatric tongue oedema scenario: A simulation study. Am J Emerg Med. 2023 07; 69:207-208.
Score: 0.041
-
Comparison of Direct and Video Laryngoscopes during Different Airway Scenarios Performed by Experienced Paramedics: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Study. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:5382739.
Score: 0.033