LUKASZ SZARPAK to Equipment Design
This is a "connection" page, showing publications LUKASZ SZARPAK has written about Equipment Design.
Connection Strength
2.193
-
Vie scope? laryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope with personal protective equipment during intubation of COVID-19 resuscitation patient. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 08; 46:788-789.
Score: 0.140
-
Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 04 20; 20(1):90.
Score: 0.137
-
Cloth masks versus medical masks for COVID-19 protection. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(2):218-219.
Score: 0.137
-
Airtraq Laryngoscope Versus the Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope During Pediatric Intubation Performed by Nurses: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study With Three Airway Scenarios. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Nov; 33(11):735-739.
Score: 0.115
-
Comparison of the Intubrite and Macintosh laryngoscopes in a difficult airway scenario. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 06; 35(6):925.
Score: 0.111
-
C-MAC compared with direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization: A manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Aug; 35(8):1142-1146.
Score: 0.110
-
A comparison of a traditional endotracheal tube versus ETView SL in endotracheal intubation during different emergency conditions: A randomized, crossover cadaver trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5170.
Score: 0.108
-
CPR using the lifeline ARM mechanical chest compression device: a randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan; 35(1):96-100.
Score: 0.107
-
Ability of paramedics to perform endotracheal intubation during continuous chest compressions: a randomized cadaver study comparing Pentax AWS and Macintosh laryngoscopes. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep; 34(9):1835-9.
Score: 0.105
-
Randomized crossover comparison of the AirTraq Avant(?) to the Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation with during simulated resuscitation by novice physicians. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug; 34(8):1708-9.
Score: 0.105
-
Which intravascular access method to choose during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun; 34(6):1160.
Score: 0.103
-
A comparison of the McGrath-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for child tracheal intubation during resuscitation by paramedics. A randomized, crossover, manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug; 34(8):1338-41.
Score: 0.101
-
Does the Venner A.P. Advance video laryngoscope improve success of first intubation attempt of trauma patient? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb; 34(2):315-6.
Score: 0.100
-
Double-lumen tube tracheal intubation in a manikin model using the VivaSight Double Lumen: a randomized controlled comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan; 34(1):103-4.
Score: 0.100
-
Pentax Airway Scope AWS-S200 video laryngoscope for child tracheal intubation in a manikin study with 3 airway scenarios. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep; 33(9):1171-4.
Score: 0.097
-
Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Oct; 174(10):1325-32.
Score: 0.097
-
Comparison of the Pentax, Truview, GlideScope, and the Miller laryngoscope for child intubation during resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar; 33(3):391-5.
Score: 0.094
-
Comparison of 3 video laryngoscopes against the Miller laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during infant resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar; 33(3):460-1.
Score: 0.094
-
Comparison of the b?b? VieScope? and direct laryngoscope for pediatric tongue oedema scenario: A simulation study. Am J Emerg Med. 2023 07; 69:207-208.
Score: 0.042
-
Novel airway device Vie Scope in several pediatric airway scenario: A randomized simulation pilot trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 10; 99(28):e21084.
Score: 0.035
-
Role of Mask/Respirator Protection Against SARS-CoV-2. Anesth Analg. 2020 07; 131(1):e33-e34.
Score: 0.035
-
Comparison of Direct and Video Laryngoscopes during Different Airway Scenarios Performed by Experienced Paramedics: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Study. Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:5382739.
Score: 0.034
-
Comparison of blind intubation via supraglottic airway devices versus standard intubation during different airway emergency scenarios in inexperienced hand: Randomized, crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12593.
Score: 0.031
-
A comparison of comfort assessment of NECKLITE vs. NeXsplint cervical collar. Pilot data. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 11; 36(11):2127-2128.
Score: 0.030
-
Comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope and blind intubation via the iGEL for Intubation With C-spine immobilization: A Randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Mar; 35(3):484-487.
Score: 0.027