Connection

LUKASZ SZARPAK to Infusions, Intraosseous

This is a "connection" page, showing publications LUKASZ SZARPAK has written about Infusions, Intraosseous.
Connection Strength

7.373
  1. Intraosseous vascular access in emergency and trauma settings: a comparison of the most universally used intraosseous devices. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Sep; 18(9):855-864.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.731
  2. Comparison of intravascular access methods applied by nurses wearing personal protective equipment in simulated COVID-19 resuscitation: A randomized crossover simulation trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 11; 49:189-194.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.722
  3. Intraosseous versus intravenous access while wearing personal protective equipment: a meta-analysis in the era of COVID-19. Kardiol Pol. 2021 03 25; 79(3):277-286.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.702
  4. Comparison of 4 Pediatric Intraosseous Access Devices: A Randomized Simulation Study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020 Oct; 36(10):e568-e572.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.689
  5. A Randomized Cadaver Study Comparing First-Attempt Success Between Tibial and Humeral Intraosseous Insertions Using NIO Device by Paramedics: A Preliminary Investigation. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May; 95(20):e3724.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.508
  6. Ability of paramedics to perform intraosseous access. A randomized cadaver study comparing EZ-IO(?) and NIO(?) devices. Resuscitation. 2016 07; 104:e5-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.507
  7. Comparison of Bone Injection Gun and Jamshidi intraosseous access devices by paramedics with and without chemical-biological-radiological-nuclear personal protective equipment: a randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jul; 34(7):1307-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.507
  8. Comparison of two intravascular access techniques when using CBRN-PPE: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun; 34(6):1170-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.504
  9. Comparison of NIO and EZ-IO intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation performed by paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun; 34(6):1166-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.502
  10. The intraosseous access devices as a method of vascular access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb; 34(2):321-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.491
  11. Are junior doctors trained to use to use intraosseous access? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan; 34(1):107.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.489
  12. Comparison of 3 different intraosseous access devices for adult during resuscitation. Randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Dec; 32(12):1490-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  13. Comparison of four different intraosseous access devices during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A randomized crossover manikin trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jul; 176(7):865-871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  14. Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes Concerning Intraosseous Access Among Hospital Physicians. Crit Care Med. 2017 01; 45(1):e117.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  15. Success of intraosseous access procedure in simulated adult resuscitation. Crit Care Resusc. 2016 Jun; 18(2):134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  16. Are firefighters able to perform intraosseous access and start fluid resuscitation in an anaphylactic patient? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug; 34(8):1707-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  17. Which intravascular access should we use in patients with suspected/confirmed COVID-19? Resuscitation. 2020 06; 151:8-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.