Header Logo

Connection

LUKASZ SZARPAK to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications LUKASZ SZARPAK has written about Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
LUKASZ SZARPAK
Connection Strength
26.576
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
  1. Effect of COVID-19 on the prevalence of bystanders performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol J. 2025; 32(1):9-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.661
  2. Impact of pandemic on use of mechanical chest compression systems. Am J Emerg Med. 2024 03; 77:227-228.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.657
  3. The Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Cardiac Arrest Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 01 08; 20(2).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.615
  4. Re: Leg-heel chest compression as an alternative for medical professionals in times of COVID-19. Am J Emerg Med. 2022 01; 51:412.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.564
  5. Meta-analysis of chest compression-only versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders for adult with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cardiol J. 2023; 30(4):606-613.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.564
  6. Intraosseous vascular access in emergency and trauma settings: a comparison of the most universally used intraosseous devices. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021 Sep; 18(9):855-864.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.557
  7. Characteristics and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest in COVID-19. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol J. 2021; 28(4):503-508.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.547
  8. Impact of COVID-19 on in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes: An updated meta-analysis. Cardiol J. 2021; 28(6):816-824.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.534
  9. Impact of COVID-19 on bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: Is it as bad as we think? Cardiol J. 2020; 27(6):884-885.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.533
  10. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated by emergency medical service teams during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort study. Cardiol J. 2021; 28(1):15-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.529
  11. An optimal chest compression technique using personal protective equipment during resuscitation in the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized crossover simulation study. Kardiol Pol. 2020 12 23; 78(12):1254-1261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.526
  12. Respiratory protection among healthcare workers during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in COVID-19 patients. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 01; 39:233.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.511
  13. Survival, neurological and safety outcomes after out of hospital cardiac arrests treated by using prehospital therapeutic hypothermia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 04; 42:168-177.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.503
  14. The thumbs angle used in the novel infant chest compression technique (new two-thumb technique, nTTT) can influence the quality parameters of resuscitation. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2019 Aug - Sep; 43(6):387.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.459
  15. Which technique for resuscitation physicians should use? Preliminary data. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 04; 37(4):791-792.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.455
  16. Comparison of the UEScope videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized, cross-over, multi-center manikin study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep; 97(36):e12085.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.455
  17. Does the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback devices improve the quality of chest compressions performed by doctors? A prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study. Cardiol J. 2019; 26(5):529-535.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  18. Comparison of two infant chest compression techniques during simulated newborn cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by a single rescuer: A randomized, crossover multicenter trial. Cardiol J. 2019; 26(6):761-768.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  19. Factors influencing high-quality chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenario, according to 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(3):642-647.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.435
  20. The impact of a CPRezy? feedback device on the quality of chest compressions performed by nurses. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 07; 36(7):1318-1319.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.431
  21. In-hospital sudden cardiac arrest protocol analysis. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(2):376-380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.430
  22. Does VideoStylet improve the effectiveness of endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec; 35(12):1981-1982.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.419
  23. Evaluation of a newly developed infant chest compression technique: A randomized crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr; 96(14):e5915.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.412
  24. The quality of a newly developed infant chest compression method applied by paramedics: a randomised crossover manikin trial. Kardiol Pol. 2017; 75(6):589-595.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.408
  25. Comparison of Macintosh and Intubrite laryngoscopes for intubation performed by novice physicians in a difficult airway scenario. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 May; 35(5):796-797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.405
  26. Comparison of direct and optical laryngoscopy during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 03; 35(3):518-519.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.404
  27. Comparison of blind intubation through the I-gel and the Air-Q? by novice physicians during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 03; 35(3):509-510.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.401
  28. CPR using the lifeline ARM mechanical chest compression device: a randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan; 35(1):96-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.398
  29. Should nurses use mechanical chest compression devices during CPR? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Oct; 34(10):2044-2045.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.393
  30. Does the use of a chest compression system in children improve the effectiveness of chest compressions? A randomised crossover simulation pilot study. Kardiol Pol. 2016; 74(12):1499-1504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.392
  31. Ability of paramedics to perform endotracheal intubation during continuous chest compressions: a randomized cadaver study comparing Pentax AWS and Macintosh laryngoscopes. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep; 34(9):1835-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.390
  32. Comparison of NIO and EZ-IO intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation performed by paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun; 34(6):1166-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.383
  33. Which intravascular access method to choose during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun; 34(6):1160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.382
  34. A comparison of the McGrath-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for child tracheal intubation during resuscitation by paramedics. A randomized, crossover, manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Aug; 34(8):1338-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.375
  35. The intraosseous access devices as a method of vascular access during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Feb; 34(2):321-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.374
  36. Simulated endotracheal intubation of a patient with cervical spine immobilization during resuscitation: a randomized comparison of the Pentax AWS, the Airtraq, and the McCoy Laryngoscopes. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Dec; 33(12):1814-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.371
  37. Child endotracheal intubation with a Clarus Levitan fiberoptic stylet vs Macintosh laryngoscope during resuscitation performed by paramedics: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov; 33(11):1547-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.363
  38. Laryngoscopic options for pediatric intubation during CPR-the authors respond. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep; 33(9):1312-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.363
  39. Comparison of Coopdech?, CoPilot?, Intubrite?, and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized, controlled crossover simulation trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Nov; 174(11):1517-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.362
  40. Comparison of 4 supraglotttic devices used by paramedics during simulated CPR : a randomized controlled crossover trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug; 33(8):1084-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.361
  41. Comparison of intubation through the McGrath MAC, GlideScope, AirTraq, and Miller Laryngoscope by paramedics during child CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul; 33(7):946-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.360
  42. Comparison of the TruView PCD video laryngoscope and macintosh laryngoscope for pediatric tracheal intubation by novice paramedics: a randomized crossover simulation trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2015 Oct; 174(10):1325-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.360
  43. A randomized comparison of the Laryngoscope with Fiber Optic Reusable Flexible Tip English Macintosh blade to the conventional Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation in simulated easy and difficult child airway with chest compression scenarios. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul; 33(7):951-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.360
  44. Comparison of infant intubation through the TruView EVO2, TruView PCD, and Miller laryngoscope by paramedics during simulated infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul; 33(7):872-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.356
  45. Comparison of the Pentax, Truview, GlideScope, and the Miller laryngoscope for child intubation during resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar; 33(3):391-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.352
  46. Comparison of 3 video laryngoscopes against the Miller laryngoscope for tracheal intubation during infant resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar; 33(3):460-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.351
  47. Simulation of blind tracheal intubation during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec 01; 190(11):1315.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.351
  48. Can BONFILS Intubation Endoscope be an alternative to direct laryngoscopy for pediatric tracheal intubation during resuscitation? Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb; 33(2):293-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  49. Quality of chest compression with CardioPump CPR compared to single rescuer standard BLS. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jan; 33(1):114-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.348
  50. The utility of brain biomarkers in predicting survival and neurological outcomes in pediatric patients after cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiol J. 2025; 32(2):130-141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  51. The gray-white matter ratio in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients must be assessed comprehensively. Resuscitation. 2024 10; 203:110365.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  52. Role of neuron-specific enolase as a prognostic marker in pediatric cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2024 02; 76:258-260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  53. A randomized crossover comparison of the b?b? VieScope and direct laryngoscope for pediatric airway management by nurses in medical simulation settings. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2023 Jul-Dec; 20(11):943-950.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  54. Outcomes of audio-instructed and video-instructed dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med. 2022 Dec; 54(1):464-471.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  55. Diagnostic performance of point-of-use ultrasound of resuscitation outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 3265 patients. Cardiol J. 2023; 30(2):237-246.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  56. Glasgow Coma Scale score of more than four on admission predicts in-hospital survival in patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 04; 42:90-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  57. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rate. Resuscitation. 2021 02; 159:40-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  58. Systematic review and meta-analysis appraising efficacy and safety of adrenaline for adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Cardiol J. 2021; 28(2):279-292.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  59. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in the Prone Position: A Good Option for Patients With COVID-19. Anesth Analg. 2020 09; 131(3):e172-e173.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  60. Resuscitation of the patient with suspected/confirmed COVID-19 when wearing personal protective equipment: A randomized multicenter crossover simulation trial. Cardiol J. 2020; 27(5):497-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  61. How should we teach cardiopulmonary resuscitation? Randomized multi-center study. Cardiol J. 2021; 28(3):439-445.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  62. The TrueCPR device in the process of teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized simulation trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul; 98(27):e15995.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  63. Comparison of Miller laryngoscope and UEScope videolaryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in four pediatric airway scenarios: a randomized, crossover simulation trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun; 178(6):937-945.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  64. Comparison of blind intubation with different supraglottic airway devices by inexperienced physicians in several airway scenarios: a manikin study. Eur J Pediatr. 2019 Jun; 178(6):871-882.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  65. Regurgitation and pulmonary aspiration during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with a laryngeal tube: A pilot crossover human cadaver study. PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0212704.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  66. The effect of chest compression frequency on the quality of resuscitation by lifeguards. A prospective randomized crossover multicenter simulation trial. Cardiol J. 2019; 26(6):769-776.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  67. Comparison of blind intubation via supraglottic airway devices versus standard intubation during different airway emergency scenarios in inexperienced hand: Randomized, crossover manikin trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct; 97(40):e12593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  68. Novel method of infant chest compression. Does the arrangement of the thumbs matter? Am J Emerg Med. 2019 04; 37(4):769-770.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  69. Schoolteachers as candidates to be basic life support trainers: A simulation trial. Cardiol J. 2019; 26(5):536-542.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  70. An analysis of the relationship between the applied medical rescue actions and the return of spontaneous circulation in adults with out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul; 97(30):e11607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  71. Development of regional extracorporeal life support system: The importance of innovative simulation training. Am J Emerg Med. 2019 01; 37(1):19-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  72. Is there any alternative to standard chest compression techniques in infants? A randomized manikin trial of the new "2-thumb-fist" option. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Feb; 97(5):e9386.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  73. Which position should we take during newborn resuscitation? A prospective, randomised, multicentre simulation trial. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(6):980-986.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  74. The impact of the use of a CPRMeter monitor on quality of chest compressions: a prospective randomised trial, cross-simulation. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(3):574-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  75. Airtraq Laryngoscope Versus the Conventional Macintosh Laryngoscope During Pediatric Intubation Performed by Nurses: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study With Three Airway Scenarios. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017 Nov; 33(11):735-739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  76. Which position for resuscitation should we take? A randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 May; 36(5):899-900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  77. A randomized comparison of three chest compression techniques and associated hemodynamic effect during infant CPR: A randomized manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct; 35(10):1420-1425.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  78. The LMA Fastrach? as a conduit for endotracheal intubation during simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 07; 35(7):1020-1021.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  79. Response to the letter concerning the article "The effect of strength training on quality of prolonged basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation" published in "Kardiologia Polska" 2017; 75, 1: 21-27. Kardiol Pol. 2017; 75(1):88-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  80. New method of infant chest compression. Authors response. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 05; 35(5):795.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  81. Evaluation of new two-thumb chest compression technique for infant CPR performed by novice physicians. A randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Apr; 35(4):604-609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  82. Comparison of the Trachway video intubating stylet and Macintosh laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation. Preliminary data. Am J Emerg Med. 2017 04; 35(4):574-575.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  83. The effect of strength training on quality of prolonged basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Kardiol Pol. 2017; 75(1):21-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  84. Videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy for child tracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 12; 34(12):2453.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  85. Can children teach their parents cardiopulmonary resuscitation and does teaching influence the retention of their knowledge? Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun; 34(6):1159-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  86. Mechanical chest compression with the LifeLine ARM device during simulated CPR. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 May; 34(5):917.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  87. Comparison of exchange of laryngeal mask airway and Igel for tracheal tube using Eschmann Tracheal Tube Introducer during simulated resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jan; 34(1):106-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  88. Pentax Airway Scope AWS-S200 video laryngoscope for child tracheal intubation in a manikin study with 3 airway scenarios. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep; 33(9):1171-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  89. Comparison of the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard manual chest compressions and the use of TrueCPR and PocketCPR feedback devices. Kardiol Pol. 2015; 73(10):924-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  90. A comparison of the ETView VivaSight SL against a fiberoptic bronchoscope for nasotracheal intubation of multitrauma patients during resuscitation. A randomized, crossover, manikin study. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug; 33(8):1097-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  91. Can the ETView VivaSight SL Rival Conventional Intubation Using the Macintosh Laryngoscope During Adult Resuscitation by Novice Physicians?: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May; 94(21):e850.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  92. Intubation of child and infant manikins during resuscitation: does the Venner A.P. Advance video laryngoscope improve the performance of nurses? Crit Care Resusc. 2015 Mar; 17(1):55-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  93. Comparison of direct intubation and Supraglottic Airway Laryngopharyngeal Tube (S.A.L.T.) for endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Randomized manikin study. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015; 47(3):195-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  94. Novel airway device Vie Scope in several pediatric airway scenario: A randomized simulation pilot trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 10; 99(28):e21084.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  95. Effect of amiodarone and lidocaine on shock-refractory cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kardiol Pol. 2020 10 23; 78(10):999-1007.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  96. BEST Life-"Bringing ECMO Simulation To Life"-How Medical Simulation Improved a Regional ECMO Program. Artif Organs. 2018 Nov; 42(11):1052-1061.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.