Connection

PANAGIOTIS KATSONIS to Female

This is a "connection" page, showing publications PANAGIOTIS KATSONIS has written about Female.
Connection Strength

0.119
  1. SLC25A42-Related Mitochondrial Disorder: New Cases and Literature Review. Clin Genet. 2026 Jan; 109(1):77-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  2. CAGI6 ID panel challenge: assessment of phenotype and variant predictions in 415 children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs). Hum Genet. 2025 Mar; 144(2-3):227-242.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  3. MYC Induces Oncogenic Stress through RNA Decay and Ribonucleotide Catabolism in Breast Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2024 Sep 04; 14(9):1699-1716.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  4. Real world predictors of response and 24-month survival in high-grade TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasms. Blood Cancer J. 2024 06 18; 14(1):99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  5. Variants in ZFX are associated with an X-linked neurodevelopmental disorder with recurrent facial gestalt. Am J Hum Genet. 2024 03 07; 111(3):487-508.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  6. Functional variants identify sex-specific genes and pathways in Alzheimer's Disease. Nat Commun. 2023 05 13; 14(1):2765.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  7. Variants in PRKAR1B cause a neurodevelopmental disorder with autism spectrum disorder, apraxia, and insensitivity to pain. Genet Med. 2021 08; 23(8):1465-1473.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  8. CAGI SickKids challenges: Assessment of phenotype and variant predictions derived from clinical and genomic data of children with undiagnosed diseases. Hum Mutat. 2019 09; 40(9):1373-1391.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  9. Assessment of blind predictions of the clinical significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants. Hum Mutat. 2019 09; 40(9):1546-1556.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  10. Assessing the performance of in silico methods for predicting the pathogenicity of variants in the gene CHEK2, among Hispanic females with breast cancer. Hum Mutat. 2019 09; 40(9):1612-1622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  11. Assessment of patient clinical descriptions and pathogenic variants from gene panel sequences in the CAGI-5 intellectual disability challenge. Hum Mutat. 2019 09; 40(9):1330-1345.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  12. Deleterious Effect of RAS and Evolutionary High-risk TP53 Double Mutation in Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg. 2019 05; 269(5):917-923.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  13. FARS2 deficiency; new cases, review of clinical, biochemical, and molecular spectra, and variants interpretation based on structural, functional, and evolutionary significance. Mol Genet Metab. 2018 11; 125(3):281-291.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  14. Combinatorial inhibition of PTPN12-regulated receptors leads to a broadly effective therapeutic strategy in triple-negative breast cancer. Nat Med. 2018 05; 24(4):505-511.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  15. Codon-level co-occurrences of germline variants and somatic mutations in cancer are rare but often lead to incorrect variant annotation and underestimated impact prediction. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0174766.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  16. Specific TP53 Mutants Overrepresented in Ovarian Cancer Impact CNV, TP53 Activity, Responses to Nutlin-3a, and Cell Survival. Neoplasia. 2015 Oct; 17(10):789-803.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  17. Evolutionary Action Score of TP53 Coding Variants Is Predictive of Platinum Response in Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Cancer Res. 2015 Apr 01; 75(7):1205-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  18. Desmosterolosis-phenotypic and molecular characterization of a third case and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Jul; 155A(7):1597-604.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  19. Mitochondrial neurogastrointestinal encephalopathy due to mutations in RRM2B. Arch Neurol. 2009 Aug; 66(8):1028-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.