Connection

ANG LI to Male

This is a "connection" page, showing publications ANG LI has written about Male.
Connection Strength

0.671
  1. Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and incidence of venous thromboembolism in older adults. J Thromb Haemost. 2025 Jul; 23(7):2235-2241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  2. Incidence and risk of arterial thromboembolism in cancer patients from a safety-net healthcare system. J Thromb Haemost. 2025 May; 23(5):1539-1550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  3. Circulating tumor DNA predicts venous thromboembolism in patients with cancers. J Thromb Haemost. 2025 Jan; 23(1):139-148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  4. Racial and Ethnic Disparity for Cancer Mortality in General and Single-Payer Healthcare Systems in the United States. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Aug; 12(4):2646-2654.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  5. Thrombosis risk prediction in lymphoma patients: A multi-institutional, retrospective model development and validation study. Am J Hematol. 2024 07; 99(7):1230-1239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  6. Natural history of cancer-associated splanchnic vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2024 May; 22(5):1421-1432.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  7. Venous thromboembolism risk in cancer patients receiving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor versus chemotherapy. Am J Hematol. 2023 08; 98(8):1214-1222.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  8. Care Delivery in Cancer Patients With Asymptomatic COVID-19 Infection in a Tertiary, Safety-Net Hospital in Houston, Texas. Am J Clin Oncol. 2021 08 01; 44(8):409-412.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  9. Impact of anticoagulation on recurrent thrombosis and bleeding after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Am J Hematol. 2021 09 01; 96(9):1137-1146.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  10. Mortality in hospitalized patients with cancer and coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Cancer. 2021 05 01; 127(9):1459-1468.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  11. Comparative effectiveness of rasburicase versus allopurinol for cancer patients with renal dysfunction and hyperuricemia. Leuk Res. 2020 02; 89:106298.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  12. The incidence of thromboembolism for lenalidomide versus thalidomide in older patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2020 Jan; 99(1):121-126.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  13. Derivation and Validation of a Risk Assessment Model for Immunomodulatory Drug-Associated Thrombosis Among Patients With Multiple Myeloma. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019 07 01; 17(7):840-847.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  14. Utilization patterns and clinical outcomes of rasburicase administration according to tumor risk stratification. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2020 Apr; 26(3):529-535.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  15. Transplant-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy Is a Multifactorial Disease Unresponsive to Immunosuppressant Withdrawal. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 03; 25(3):570-576.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  16. External validation of the PLASMIC score: a clinical prediction tool for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura diagnosis and treatment. J Thromb Haemost. 2018 01; 16(1):164-169.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  17. Clinical features and outcomes in patients with thrombotic microangiopathy not associated with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency. Transfusion. 2017 09; 57(9):2151-2158.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  18. Treatment with or without plasma exchange for patients with acquired thrombotic microangiopathy not associated with severe ADAMTS13 deficiency: a propensity score-matched study. Transfusion. 2016 08; 56(8):2069-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  19. Clinical Outcomes and Patterns of Care Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma in a Safety-Net Health System. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2026 Jan; 26(1):e12-e20.e5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  20. Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Review. JAMA. 2025 08 12; 334(6):517-529.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  21. Development and validation of risk models for hospital-acquired bleeding in medical inpatients: the Medical Inpatients Thrombosis and Hemostasis (MITH) study. J Thromb Haemost. 2026 Feb; 24(2):418-430.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  22. Impact of sociodemographic determinants on enrollment into contemporary lymphoma clinical trials: a systematic review. Oncologist. 2025 Jun 04; 30(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  23. Clinical and genetic markers of vascular toxicity in glioblastoma patients: Insights from NRG Oncology RTOG-0825. Neuro Oncol. 2025 Mar 07; 27(3):767-778.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  24. Factors associated with venous thromboembolism pharmacoprophylaxis initiation in hospitalized medical patients: the Medical Inpatients Thrombosis and Hemostasis study. J Thromb Haemost. 2024 Dec; 22(12):3521-3531.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  25. Discordance between aPTT and anti-Xa in monitoring heparin anticoagulation in mechanical circulatory support. ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct; 11(5):2742-2748.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  26. A Multi-Institutional Natural Language Processing Pipeline to Extract Performance Status From Electronic Health Records. Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec; 31:10732748241279518.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  27. Epidemiology of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Solid and Hematologic Neoplasms in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 06 01; 6(6):e2317945.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  28. Clonal Hematopoiesis Mutations in Patients with Lung Cancer Are Associated with Lung Cancer Risk Factors. Cancer Res. 2022 01 15; 82(2):199-209.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  29. The Effectiveness of Electronic Health Interventions for Promoting HIV-Preventive Behaviors Among Men Who Have Sex With Men: Meta-Analysis Based on an Integrative Framework of Design and Implementation Features. J Med Internet Res. 2020 05 25; 22(5):e15977.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  30. Incidence, Risk Factors for and Outcomes of Transplant-Associated Thrombotic Microangiopathy. Br J Haematol. 2020 06; 189(6):1171-1181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  31. Impact of performance status on treatment outcomes: A real-world study of advanced urothelial cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer. 2020 03 15; 126(6):1208-1216.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  32. Safety of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant in adults after CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy. Blood Adv. 2019 10 22; 3(20):3062-3069.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  33. Direct oral anticoagulant- versus vitamin K antagonist-related gastrointestinal bleeding: Insights from a nationwide cohort. Am Heart J. 2019 10; 216:117-124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  34. Predictors of relapse and efficacy of rituximab in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood Adv. 2019 05 14; 3(9):1512-1518.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  35. Factors affecting lymphocyte collection efficiency for the manufacture of chimeric antigen receptor T cells in adults with B-cell malignancies. Transfusion. 2019 05; 59(5):1773-1780.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  36. Derivation and external validation of the PLASMIC score for rapid assessment of adults with thrombotic microangiopathies: a cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2017 Apr; 4(4):e157-e164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  37. Impact of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency on clinical presentation and outcomes in patients with thrombotic microangiopathies: the experience of the Harvard TMA Research Collaborative. Br J Haematol. 2015 Dec; 171(5):836-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  38. Aminocaproic acid use in hospitalized patients with hematological malignancy: a case series. Hematol Oncol. 2016 Sep; 34(3):147-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.