Header Logo

Connection

ERIC SILBERFEIN to Retrospective Studies

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications ERIC SILBERFEIN has written about Retrospective Studies.
ERIC SILBERFEIN
Connection Strength
0.309
Retrospective Studies
  1. Demographic and Clinicopathologic Factors of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Safety Net Hospital. J Surg Res. 2020 12; 256:374-380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  2. Granulomatous mastitis: a 10?year experience from a large inner city county hospital. J Surg Res. 2013 Sep; 184(1):299-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  3. Factors associated with phyllodes tumor of the breast after core needle biopsy identifies fibroepithelial neoplasm. J Surg Res. 2012 Nov; 178(1):299-303.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  4. Reoperative parathyroidectomy: location of missed glands based on a contemporary nomenclature system. Arch Surg. 2010 Nov; 145(11):1065-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  5. Long-term survival and recurrence outcomes following surgery for distal rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Nov; 17(11):2863-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  6. Percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis in high-risk patients: experience of a surgeon-initiated interventional program. Am J Surg. 2007 Nov; 194(5):672-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  7. Comparing barriers to early stage diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma between safety net hospitals and academic medical centers: An analysis from the United States Safety-Net Collaborative. J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep; 130(3):493-503.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  8. Factors associated with inability to return to intended oncologic treatment in pancreatic cancer. Am J Surg. 2022 07; 224(1 Pt B):635-640.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  9. Surgical resection of early stage hepatocellular carcinoma improves patient survival at safety net hospitals. J Surg Oncol. 2021 Mar; 123(4):963-969.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  10. Survival inequity in vulnerable populations with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a United States safety-net collaborative analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2021 06; 23(6):868-876.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  11. Surgical management of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein thrombosis: The United States Safety Net and Academic Center Collaborative Analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb; 123(2):407-415.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  12. Disparities in Presentation at Time of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis: A United States Safety-Net Collaborative Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Apr; 28(4):1929-1936.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  13. Dissecting disease, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors for hepatocellular carcinoma: An analysis from the United States Safety Net Collaborative. Surg Oncol. 2020 Dec; 35:120-125.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  14. Impact of hepatitis C treatment on long-term outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a United States Safety Net Collaborative Study. HPB (Oxford). 2021 03; 23(3):422-433.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  15. The Evolving Landscape of Hepatocellular Carcinoma : A US Safety Net Collaborative Analysis of Etiology of Cirrhosis. Am Surg. 2020 Jul; 86(7):865-872.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  16. Pancreatic Incidentalomas: A Management Algorithm for Identifying Ectopic Spleens. J Surg Res. 2019 04; 236:144-152.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  17. Understaging of clinical stage I pancreatic cancer and the impact of multimodality therapy. Surgery. 2019 02; 165(2):307-314.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  18. Venous thrombosis following pancreaticoduodenectomy with venous resection. J Surg Res. 2018 08; 228:271-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  19. Sequential drain amylase to guide drain removal following pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2018 06; 20(6):514-520.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  20. Value of lymph node positivity in treatment planning for early stage pancreatic cancer. Surgery. 2017 09; 162(3):557-567.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  21. Treatment delays of colon cancer in a safety-net hospital system. J Surg Res. 2015 Oct; 198(2):311-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  22. An assessment of the necessity of transfusion during pancreatoduodenectomy. Surgery. 2013 Sep; 154(3):504-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  23. Treatment of bacteriobilia decreases wound infection rates after pancreaticoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jun; 16(6):592-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  24. Postoperative mortality and need for transitional care following liver resection for metastatic disease in elderly patients: a population-level analysis of 4026 patients. HPB (Oxford). 2012 Dec; 14(12):863-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  25. Pilot prognostic model of extremely poor survival among high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2012 Dec 15; 118(24):6118-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  26. A multi-institutional study of pancreatic cancer in Harris County, Texas: race predicts treatment and survival. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Sep; 19(9):2776-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  27. Routine nasogastric suction may be unnecessary after a pancreatic resection. HPB (Oxford). 2011 Nov; 13(11):792-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  28. Obesity does not increase complications following pancreatic surgery. J Surg Res. 2011 Oct; 170(2):220-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  29. Concomitant intraoperative splenic artery embolization and laparoscopic splenectomy versus laparoscopic splenectomy: comparison of treatment outcome. Am J Surg. 2007 Jun; 193(6):713-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  30. Rate of malignancies in breast abscesses and argument for ultrasound drainage. Am J Surg. 2006 Dec; 192(6):869-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  31. In situ reconstruction with cryopreserved arterial allografts for management of mycotic aneurysms or aortic prosthetic graft infections: a multi-institutional experience. Tex Heart Inst J. 2006; 33(1):14-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.