Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by AMY MCGUIRE and DONALD PARSONS.
Connection Strength

1.426
  1. Pediatric Oncologists' Experiences Returning and Incorporating Genomic Sequencing Results into Cancer Care. J Pers Med. 2021 Jun 18; 11(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.196
  2. Responsibility, culpability, and parental views on genomic testing for seriously ill children. Genet Med. 2019 12; 21(12):2791-2797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  3. Agents of empathy: How medical interpreters bridge sociocultural gaps in genomic sequencing disclosures with Spanish-speaking families. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 05; 102(5):895-901.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  4. Parental Perspectives on Whole Exome Sequencing in Pediatric Cancer: A Typology of Perceived Utility. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017; 1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  5. Diagnostic Yield of Clinical Tumor and Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing for Children With Solid Tumors. JAMA Oncol. 2016 May 01; 2(5):616-624.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  6. Obtaining informed consent for clinical tumor and germline exome sequencing of newly diagnosed childhood cancer patients. Genome Med. 2014; 6(9):69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  7. Comparing the Diagnostic Yield of Germline Exome Versus Panel Sequencing in the Diverse Population of the Texas KidsCanSeq Pediatric Cancer Study. JCO Precis Oncol. 2024 Sep; 8:e2400187.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  8. Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents. Genet Med. 2024 Aug; 26(8):101168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  9. Families' experiences accessing care after genomic sequencing in the pediatric cancer context: "It's just been a big juggle". J Genet Couns. 2024 Dec; 33(6):1337-1350.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  10. Views of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Oncologists Toward Patients' Participation in Genomic Research. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2023 10; 12(5):773-781.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  11. Exome sequencing disclosures in pediatric cancer care: Patterns of communication among oncologists, genetic counselors, and parents. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 04; 102(4):680-686.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  12. The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2018 09 06; 103(3):319-327.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  13. Portero versus portador: Spanish interpretation of genomic terminology during whole exome sequencing results disclosure. Per Med. 2017 11; 14(6):503-514.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  14. Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 07 07; 99(1):246.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  15. Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 06 02; 98(6):1051-1066.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  16. Is Whole-Exome Sequencing an Ethically Disruptive Technology? Perspectives of Pediatric Oncologists and Parents of Pediatric Patients With Solid Tumors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016 Mar; 63(3):511-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  17. Pediatric Cancer Genetics Research and an Evolving Preventive Ethics Approach for Return of Results after Death of the Subject. J Law Med Ethics. 2015; 43(3):529-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.