Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by AMY MCGUIRE and CHRISTI GUERRINI.
Connection Strength
12.461
-
IGG in the trenches: Results of an in-depth interview study on the practice, politics, and future of investigative genetic genealogy. Forensic Sci Int. 2024 Mar; 356:111946.
Score: 0.985
-
Fresh takes on five health data sharing domains: Quality, privacy, equity, incentives, and sustainability. Front Big Data. 2023; 6:1095119.
Score: 0.920
-
An Ethics Framework for Evaluating Ownership Practices in Biomedical Citizen Science. Citiz Sci. 2022; 7(1).
Score: 0.911
-
"Idealists and capitalists": ownership attitudes and preferences in genomic citizen science. New Genet Soc. 2022; 41(2):74-95.
Score: 0.874
-
Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services. Am J Hum Genet. 2022 03 03; 109(3):486-497.
Score: 0.862
-
Core values of genomic citizen science: results from a qualitative interview study. Biosocieties. 2022 Jun; 17(2):203-228.
Score: 0.782
-
Essential, not peripheral: Addressing health care workers' mental health concerns during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Occup Health. 2020 Jan; 62(1):e12169.
Score: 0.742
-
Donors, authors, and owners: how is genomic citizen science addressing interests in research outputs? BMC Med Ethics. 2019 11 21; 20(1):84.
Score: 0.737
-
Who's on third? Regulation of third-party genetic interpretation services. Genet Med. 2020 01; 22(1):4-11.
Score: 0.723
-
Biomedical Citizen Science or Something Else? Reflections on Terms and Definitions. Am J Bioeth. 2019 Aug; 19(8):17-19.
Score: 0.721
-
Clarify the HIPAA right of access to individuals' research data. Nat Biotechnol. 2019 08; 37(8):850-852.
Score: 0.721
-
Should police have access to genetic genealogy databases? Capturing the Golden State Killer and other criminals using a controversial new forensic technique. PLoS Biol. 2018 10; 16(10):e2006906.
Score: 0.681
-
Citizen science, public policy. Science. 2018 07 13; 361(6398):134-136.
Score: 0.670
-
Persistent confusion and controversy surrounding gene patents. Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Feb; 34(2):145-7.
Score: 0.566
-
Challenges to Building a Gene Variant Commons to Assess Hereditary Cancer Risk: Results of a Modified Policy Delphi Panel Deliberation. J Pers Med. 2021 Jul 08; 11(7).
Score: 0.206
-
Psychological Distress Among the U.S. General Population During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:642918.
Score: 0.206
-
Four misconceptions about investigative genetic genealogy. J Law Biosci. 2021 Jan-Jun; 8(1):lsab001.
Score: 0.203
-
Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Value and Risk. Annu Rev Med. 2021 01 27; 72:151-166.
Score: 0.193
-
Genealogy databases and the future of criminal investigation. Science. 2018 06 08; 360(6393):1078-1079.
Score: 0.166
-
Constraints on gene patent protection fuel secrecy concerns: a qualitative study. J Law Biosci. 2017 Dec; 4(3):542-564.
Score: 0.160
-
Sharing data under the 21st Century Cures Act. Genet Med. 2017 12; 19(12):1289-1294.
Score: 0.155
-
Myriad take two: Can genomic databases remain secret? Science. 2017 05 12; 356(6338):586-587.
Score: 0.155
-
Public Perspectives on Investigative Genetic Genealogy: Findings from a National Focus Group Study. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Apr 08; 1-11.
Score: 0.062
-
Policy options to facilitate cancer genomic variant data sharing: outcomes of a modified policy Delphi. J Law Biosci. 2023 Jul-Dec; 10(2):lsad022.
Score: 0.059