Connection

AMY MCGUIRE to Surveys and Questionnaires

This is a "connection" page, showing publications AMY MCGUIRE has written about Surveys and Questionnaires.
Connection Strength

1.109
  1. Treatment Decision-Making Roles and Preferences Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2026 Jun; 73(6):e70235.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  2. Ethical controversies in organ procurement: A national survey on public perceptions of thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion. Am J Transplant. 2026 Apr; 26(4):785-796.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  3. FIGG at 5: An update on U.S. public perspectives on forensic investigative genetic genealogy five years after its introduction to criminal investigations. Forensic Sci Int. 2025 Feb; 367:112372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  4. Family secrets: Experiences and outcomes of participating in direct-to-consumer genetic relative-finder services. Am J Hum Genet. 2022 03 03; 109(3):486-497.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  5. Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertisement and Prescribing Practices: Evidence Review and Practical Guidance for Clinicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 05; 36(5):1390-1394.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  6. Should police have access to genetic genealogy databases? Capturing the Golden State Killer and other criminals using a controversial new forensic technique. PLoS Biol. 2018 10; 16(10):e2006906.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  7. HEADS4: Social Media Screening in Adolescent Primary Care. Pediatrics. 2018 06; 141(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  8. When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun; 8(2):82-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  9. Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Am J Bioeth. 2009; 9(6-7):3-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  10. Differences Between Government, Consortium, and Private Database Stewards Impacting the Genomic Data Market: A Survey of U.S. Academic Genetic Researchers. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2026 Jan-Mar; 17(1):20-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  11. "Holy Cow, Where do I Sign up?" Attitudes of Military Veterans Toward Epigenomic Biomarker Toxic Exposure Testing. Mil Med. 2025 Jun 30; 190(7-8):e1663-e1669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  12. Measuring perceived utility of genomic sequencing: Development and validation of the GENEtic Utility (GENE-U) scale for adult screening. Genet Med. 2024 Nov; 26(11):101240.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  13. "The truth should not be hidden": Experiences and recommendations of individuals making NPE discoveries through genetic genealogy databases. Genet Med. 2024 Oct; 26(10):101210.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  14. Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents. Genet Med. 2024 Aug; 26(8):101168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  15. Measuring perceived utility of genomic sequencing: Development and validation of?the GENEtic Utility (GENE-U) scale for pediatric diagnostic testing. Genet Med. 2024 Aug; 26(8):101146.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  16. Patient and Clinician Perceptions of Precision Cardiology Care: Findings From the HeartCare Study. Circ Genom Precis Med. 2022 12; 15(6):e003605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  17. Ventilator Triage Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic at U.S. Hospitals Associated With Members of the Association of Bioethics Program Directors. Ann Intern Med. 2020 08 04; 173(3):188-194.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  18. Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium. Genome Med. 2019 02 27; 11(1):10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  19. Perceived Benefits, Risks, and Utility of Newborn Genomic Sequencing in the BabySeq Project. Pediatrics. 2019 01; 143(Suppl 1):S6-S13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  20. Patient understanding of, satisfaction with, and perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing: findings from the MedSeq Project. Genet Med. 2018 09; 20(9):1069-1076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  21. Do privacy and security regulations need a status update? Perspectives from an intergenerational survey. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0184525.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  22. Navigating the research-clinical interface in genomic medicine: analysis from the CSER Consortium. Genet Med. 2018 04; 20(5):545-553.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  23. Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing Experience. Milbank Q. 2017 06; 95(2):291-318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  24. Participants and Study Decliners' Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 02; 11(1):21-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  25. Pregnant patients' risk perception of prenatal test results with uncertain fetal clinical significance: ultrasound versus advanced genetic testing. Prenat Diagn. 2015 Dec; 35(12):1213-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  26. Pediatric data sharing in genomic research: attitudes and preferences of parents. Pediatrics. 2014 Apr; 133(4):690-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  27. Principal investigator views of the IRB system. Int J Med Sci. 2008 Apr 02; 5(2):68-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.