AMY MCGUIRE to Decision Making
This is a "connection" page, showing publications AMY MCGUIRE has written about Decision Making.
Connection Strength
1.647
-
Beyond shared decision making: an expanded typology of medical decisions. Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct; 28(5):699-705.
Score: 0.206
-
Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making. Med Care. 2005 May; 43(5):466-70.
Score: 0.166
-
Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents. Genet Med. 2024 Aug; 26(8):101168.
Score: 0.155
-
Deciding with Others: Interdependent Decision-Making. Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 11; 52(6):23-32.
Score: 0.139
-
Responsibility, culpability, and parental views on genomic testing for seriously ill children. Genet Med. 2019 12; 21(12):2791-2797.
Score: 0.110
-
When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun; 8(2):82-88.
Score: 0.094
-
Overcoming the reimbursement barriers for clinical sequencing. JAMA. 2014 Nov 12; 312(18):1857-8.
Score: 0.080
-
Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board. Genet Med. 2014 Jul; 16(7):547-52.
Score: 0.076
-
Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Oct; 8(4):42-52.
Score: 0.074
-
The indispensable role of professional judgment in genomic medicine. JAMA. 2013 Apr 10; 309(14):1465-6.
Score: 0.072
-
Currents in contemporary bioethics. Identifying consanguinity through routine genomic analysis: reporting requirements. J Law Med Ethics. 2012; 40(4):1040-6.
Score: 0.066
-
Shaping patients' decisions. Chest. 2011 Feb; 139(2):424-429.
Score: 0.062
-
The right to ignore genetic status of late onset genetic disease in the genomic era; Prenatal testing for Huntington disease as a paradigm. Am J Med Genet A. 2010 Jul; 152A(7):1774-80.
Score: 0.059
-
Beneficent persuasion: techniques and ethical guidelines to improve patients' decisions. Ann Fam Med. 2010 May-Jun; 8(3):260-4.
Score: 0.059
-
A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 06; 140(1):54-9.
Score: 0.038
-
Views of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Oncologists Toward Patients' Participation in Genomic Research. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2023 10; 12(5):773-781.
Score: 0.035
-
Parents' decision-making regarding whether to receive adult-onset only genetic findings for their children: Findings from the BabySeq Project. Genet Med. 2023 03; 25(3):100002.
Score: 0.035
-
Exome sequencing disclosures in pediatric cancer care: Patterns of communication among oncologists, genetic counselors, and parents. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 04; 102(4):680-686.
Score: 0.026
-
Secondary findings from clinical genomic sequencing: prevalence, patient perspectives, family history assessment, and health-care costs from a multisite study. Genet Med. 2019 05; 21(5):1100-1110.
Score: 0.026
-
Patient understanding of, satisfaction with, and perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing: findings from the MedSeq Project. Genet Med. 2018 09; 20(9):1069-1076.
Score: 0.025
-
Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing Experience. Milbank Q. 2017 06; 95(2):291-318.
Score: 0.024
-
Social and behavioral research in genomic sequencing: approaches from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium Outcomes and Measures Working Group. Genet Med. 2014 Oct; 16(10):727-35.
Score: 0.019