AMY MCGUIRE to Genome, Human
This is a "connection" page, showing publications AMY MCGUIRE has written about Genome, Human.
Connection Strength
4.297
-
The road ahead in genetics and genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2020 10; 21(10):581-596.
Score: 0.438
-
Moving beyond Bermuda: sharing data to build a medical information commons. Genome Res. 2017 06; 27(6):897-901.
Score: 0.346
-
When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2017 Apr-Jun; 8(2):82-88.
Score: 0.342
-
Clinical integration of next generation sequencing: a policy analysis. J Law Med Ethics. 2014; 42 Suppl 1:5-8.
Score: 0.276
-
The indispensable role of professional judgment in genomic medicine. JAMA. 2013 Apr 10; 309(14):1465-6.
Score: 0.263
-
Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: genome research participants' perspectives. Public Health Genomics. 2012; 15(2):106-14.
Score: 0.240
-
Health system implications of direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Public Health Genomics. 2011; 14(1):53-8.
Score: 0.222
-
Science and regulation. Regulating direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Science. 2010 Oct 08; 330(6001):181-2.
Score: 0.221
-
Personal genome research : what should the participant be told? Trends Genet. 2010 May; 26(5):199-201.
Score: 0.213
-
Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2008 02; 9(2):152-6.
Score: 0.183
-
Medicine. The future of personal genomics. Science. 2007 Sep 21; 317(5845):1687.
Score: 0.179
-
Actionability of unanticipated monogenic disease risks in newborn genomic screening: Findings from the BabySeq Project. Am J Hum Genet. 2023 07 06; 110(7):1034-1045.
Score: 0.133
-
Toward better governance of human genomic data. Nat Genet. 2021 01; 53(1):2-8.
Score: 0.112
-
Interpretation of Genomic Sequencing Results in Healthy and Ill Newborns: Results from the BabySeq Project. Am J Hum Genet. 2019 01 03; 104(1):76-93.
Score: 0.098
-
The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2018 09 06; 103(3):319-327.
Score: 0.095
-
Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 06 02; 98(6):1051-1066.
Score: 0.081
-
An open access pilot freely sharing cancer genomic data from participants in Texas. Sci Data. 2016 Feb 16; 3:160010.
Score: 0.080
-
Potential Psychosocial Risks of Sequencing Newborns. Pediatrics. 2016 Jan; 137 Suppl 1:S24-9.
Score: 0.079
-
Are physicians prepared for whole genome sequencing? a qualitative analysis. Clin Genet. 2016 Feb; 89(2):228-34.
Score: 0.077
-
The MedSeq Project: a randomized trial of integrating whole genome sequencing into clinical medicine. Trials. 2014 Mar 20; 15:85.
Score: 0.070
-
Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science. 2013 Jan 18; 339(6117):321-4.
Score: 0.065
-
To share or not to share: a randomized trial of consent for data sharing in genome research. Genet Med. 2011 Nov; 13(11):948-55.
Score: 0.059
-
Whole-genome sequencing in a patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. N Engl J Med. 2010 Apr 01; 362(13):1181-91.
Score: 0.053
-
Personalized genomic information: preparing for the future of genetic medicine. Nat Rev Genet. 2010 02; 11(2):161-5.
Score: 0.052
-
Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing. Am J Bioeth. 2009; 9(6-7):3-10.
Score: 0.049
-
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater: enabling a bottom-up approach in genome-wide association studies. Genome Res. 2008 Nov; 18(11):1683-5.
Score: 0.048
-
The complete genome of an individual by massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nature. 2008 Apr 17; 452(7189):872-6.
Score: 0.046
-
Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement. PLoS Biol. 2008 Mar 25; 6(3):e73.
Score: 0.046
-
The BabySeq Project: A clinical trial of genome sequencing in a diverse cohort of infants. Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Oct 03; 111(10):2094-2106.
Score: 0.036
-
Patient understanding of, satisfaction with, and perceived utility of whole-genome sequencing: findings from the MedSeq Project. Genet Med. 2018 09; 20(9):1069-1076.
Score: 0.023
-
A curated gene list for reporting results of newborn genomic sequencing. Genet Med. 2017 07; 19(7):809-818.
Score: 0.021
-
Reflections on the cost of "low-cost" whole genome sequencing: framing the health policy debate. PLoS Biol. 2013 Nov; 11(11):e1001699.
Score: 0.017
-
ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013 Jul; 15(7):565-74.
Score: 0.017
-
Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing. Genet Med. 2012 Apr; 14(4):405-10.
Score: 0.015