AMY MCGUIRE to Genomics
This is a "connection" page, showing publications AMY MCGUIRE has written about Genomics.
Connection Strength
6.378
-
The road ahead in genetics and genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2020 10; 21(10):581-596.
Score: 0.398
-
Donors, authors, and owners: how is genomic citizen science addressing interests in research outputs? BMC Med Ethics. 2019 11 21; 20(1):84.
Score: 0.377
-
Moving beyond Bermuda: sharing data to build a medical information commons. Genome Res. 2017 06; 27(6):897-901.
Score: 0.314
-
Persistent confusion and controversy surrounding gene patents. Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Feb; 34(2):145-7.
Score: 0.290
-
Can I be sued for that? Liability risk and the disclosure of clinically significant genetic research findings. Genome Res. 2014 May; 24(5):719-23.
Score: 0.255
-
Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Oct; 8(4):42-52.
Score: 0.247
-
Point-counterpoint. Ethics and genomic incidental findings. Science. 2013 May 31; 340(6136):1047-8.
Score: 0.240
-
The indispensable role of professional judgment in genomic medicine. JAMA. 2013 Apr 10; 309(14):1465-6.
Score: 0.239
-
The legal risks of returning results of genomics research. Genet Med. 2012 Apr; 14(4):473-7.
Score: 0.220
-
Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: genome research participants' perspectives. Public Health Genomics. 2012; 15(2):106-14.
Score: 0.218
-
To share or not to share: a randomized trial of consent for data sharing in genome research. Genet Med. 2011 Nov; 13(11):948-55.
Score: 0.216
-
Ethical and practical challenges of sharing data from genome-wide association studies: the eMERGE Consortium experience. Genome Res. 2011 Jul; 21(7):1001-7.
Score: 0.210
-
The right to ignore genetic status of late onset genetic disease in the genomic era; Prenatal testing for Huntington disease as a paradigm. Am J Med Genet A. 2010 Jul; 152A(7):1774-80.
Score: 0.197
-
The ethical use of existing samples for genome research. Genet Med. 2009 Oct; 11(10):712-5.
Score: 0.187
-
Medicine. The future of personal genomics. Science. 2007 Sep 21; 317(5845):1687.
Score: 0.162
-
Meeting the growing demands of genetic research. J Law Med Ethics. 2006; 34(4):809-12.
Score: 0.144
-
Conceptualization of utility in translational clinical genomics research. Am J Hum Genet. 2021 11 04; 108(11):2027-2036.
Score: 0.108
-
Perceived Utility of Genomic Sequencing: Qualitative Analysis and Synthesis of a Conceptual Model to Inform Patient-Centered Instrument Development. Patient. 2022 05; 15(3):317-328.
Score: 0.108
-
Toward better governance of human genomic data. Nat Genet. 2021 01; 53(1):2-8.
Score: 0.102
-
Airmen and health-care providers' attitudes toward the use of genomic sequencing in the US Air Force: findings from the MilSeq Project. Genet Med. 2020 12; 22(12):2003-2010.
Score: 0.099
-
Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics. J Law Med Ethics. 2020 03; 48(1):69-86.
Score: 0.096
-
Responsibility, culpability, and parental views on genomic testing for seriously ill children. Genet Med. 2019 12; 21(12):2791-2797.
Score: 0.091
-
The Genomic Medicine Integrative Research Framework: A Conceptual Framework for Conducting Genomic Medicine Research. Am J Hum Genet. 2019 06 06; 104(6):1088-1096.
Score: 0.091
-
Interpretation of Genomic Sequencing Results in Healthy and Ill Newborns: Results from the BabySeq Project. Am J Hum Genet. 2019 01 03; 104(1):76-93.
Score: 0.089
-
Agents of empathy: How medical interpreters bridge sociocultural gaps in genomic sequencing disclosures with Spanish-speaking families. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 05; 102(5):895-901.
Score: 0.088
-
Portero versus portador: Spanish interpretation of genomic terminology during whole exome sequencing results disclosure. Per Med. 2017 11; 14(6):503-514.
Score: 0.082
-
Navigating the research-clinical interface in genomic medicine: analysis from the CSER Consortium. Genet Med. 2018 04; 20(5):545-553.
Score: 0.081
-
Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium: Accelerating Evidence-Based Practice of Genomic Medicine. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 06 02; 98(6):1051-1066.
Score: 0.074
-
GINA, genetic discrimination, and genomic medicine. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 29; 372(5):397-9.
Score: 0.068
-
A one-page summary report of genome sequencing for the healthy adult. Public Health Genomics. 2015; 18(2):123-9.
Score: 0.067
-
Pediatric Cancer Genetics Research and an Evolving Preventive Ethics Approach for Return of Results after Death of the Subject. J Law Med Ethics. 2015; 43(3):529-37.
Score: 0.067
-
Development of the clinical next-generation sequencing industry in a shifting policy climate. Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Oct; 32(10):980-2.
Score: 0.066
-
Social and behavioral research in genomic sequencing: approaches from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium Outcomes and Measures Working Group. Genet Med. 2014 Oct; 16(10):727-35.
Score: 0.064
-
Pediatric data sharing in genomic research: attitudes and preferences of parents. Pediatrics. 2014 Apr; 133(4):690-7.
Score: 0.064
-
Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board. Genet Med. 2014 Jul; 16(7):547-52.
Score: 0.063
-
Reflections on the cost of "low-cost" whole genome sequencing: framing the health policy debate. PLoS Biol. 2013 Nov; 11(11):e1001699.
Score: 0.062
-
Adult genetic risk screening. Annu Rev Med. 2014; 65:1-17.
Score: 0.062
-
Return of research results from genomic biobanks: a call for data. Genet Med. 2013 Feb; 15(2):159-60.
Score: 0.059
-
Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science. 2013 Jan 18; 339(6117):321-4.
Score: 0.059
-
Return of research results from genomic biobanks: cost matters. Genet Med. 2013 Feb; 15(2):103-5.
Score: 0.057
-
The Human Microbiome Project: a community resource for the healthy human microbiome. PLoS Biol. 2012; 10(8):e1001377.
Score: 0.057
-
Personalized genomic information: preparing for the future of genetic medicine. Nat Rev Genet. 2010 02; 11(2):161-5.
Score: 0.048
-
The complete genome of an individual by massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nature. 2008 Apr 17; 452(7189):872-6.
Score: 0.042
-
Research ethics recommendations for whole-genome research: consensus statement. PLoS Biol. 2008 Mar 25; 6(3):e73.
Score: 0.042
-
"A Double-Edged Sword": A Brief History of Genomic Data Governance and Genetic Researcher Perspectives on Data Sharing. J Law Med Ethics. 2024; 52(2):399-411.
Score: 0.033
-
Measuring perceived utility of genomic sequencing: Development and validation of the GENEtic Utility (GENE-U) scale for adult screening. Genet Med. 2024 Nov; 26(11):101240.
Score: 0.033
-
Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents. Genet Med. 2024 Aug; 26(8):101168.
Score: 0.032
-
Measuring perceived utility of genomic sequencing: Development and validation of?the GENEtic Utility (GENE-U) scale for pediatric diagnostic testing. Genet Med. 2024 Aug; 26(8):101146.
Score: 0.032
-
Families' experiences accessing care after genomic sequencing in the pediatric cancer context: "It's just been a big juggle". J Genet Couns. 2024 Dec; 33(6):1337-1350.
Score: 0.031
-
Actionability of unanticipated monogenic disease risks in newborn genomic screening: Findings from the BabySeq Project. Am J Hum Genet. 2023 07 06; 110(7):1034-1045.
Score: 0.030
-
Views of Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer and Their Oncologists Toward Patients' Participation in Genomic Research. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2023 10; 12(5):773-781.
Score: 0.029
-
Key drivers of family-level utility of pediatric genomic sequencing: a qualitative analysis to support preference research. Eur J Hum Genet. 2023 04; 31(4):445-452.
Score: 0.029
-
Effects of participation in a U.S. trial of newborn genomic sequencing on parents at risk for depression. J Genet Couns. 2022 02; 31(1):218-229.
Score: 0.026
-
Psychological outcomes related to exome and genome sequencing result disclosure: a meta-analysis of seven Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research (CSER) Consortium studies. Genet Med. 2019 12; 21(12):2781-2790.
Score: 0.023
-
Improving recommendations for genomic medicine: building an evolutionary process from clinical practice advisory documents to guidelines. Genet Med. 2019 11; 21(11):2431-2438.
Score: 0.023
-
Secondary findings from clinical genomic sequencing: prevalence, patient perspectives, family history assessment, and health-care costs from a multisite study. Genet Med. 2019 05; 21(5):1100-1110.
Score: 0.022
-
The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating Genomic Sequencing in Diverse and Medically Underserved Populations. Am J Hum Genet. 2018 09 06; 103(3):319-327.
Score: 0.022
-
A curated gene list for reporting results of newborn genomic sequencing. Genet Med. 2017 07; 19(7):809-818.
Score: 0.019
-
Confronting real time ethical, legal, and social issues in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium. Genet Med. 2010 Oct; 12(10):616-20.
Score: 0.013
-
Developing a tissue resource to characterize the genome of pancreatic cancer. World J Surg. 2009 Apr; 33(4):723-31.
Score: 0.011