Header Logo

Connection

AMY MCGUIRE to Informed Consent

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications AMY MCGUIRE has written about Informed Consent.
AMY MCGUIRE
Connection Strength
4.158
Informed Consent
  1. Are Psychedelic Experiences Transformative? Can We Consent to Them? Perspect Biol Med. 2024; 67(1):143-154.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.720
  2. Return of individual genomic research results: what do consent forms tell participants? Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 11; 24(11):1524-1529.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.428
  3. Participants' recall and understanding of genomic research and large-scale data sharing. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2013 Oct; 8(4):42-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.354
  4. Informed consent in genomics and genetic research. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2010; 11:361-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.273
  5. Please don't call my mom: pediatric consent and confidentiality. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009 Apr; 48(3):243-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.254
  6. Identifiability of DNA data: the need for consistent federal policy. Am J Bioeth. 2008 Oct; 8(10):75-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.250
  7. Meeting the growing demands of genetic research. J Law Med Ethics. 2006; 34(4):809-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.207
  8. Developing an Ethics and Policy Framework for Psychedelic Clinical Care: A Consensus Statement. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 06 03; 7(6):e2414650.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  9. Toward Meeting the Obligation of Respect for Persons in Pragmatic Clinical Trials. Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 05; 52(3):9-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  10. Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics. J Law Med Ethics. 2020 03; 48(1):69-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  11. Genomic Data-Sharing Practices. J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):31-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  12. Ethical and Legal Challenges Associated with Public Molecular Autopsies. J Law Med Ethics. 2016 06; 44(2):309-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  13. Participants and Study Decliners' Perspectives About the Risks of Participating in a Clinical Trial of Whole Genome Sequencing. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2016 02; 11(1):21-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  14. Balancing the risks and benefits of genomic data sharing: genome research participants' perspectives. Public Health Genomics. 2012; 15(2):106-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  15. To share or not to share: a randomized trial of consent for data sharing in genome research. Genet Med. 2011 Nov; 13(11):948-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  16. Informed consent in research to improve the number and quality of deceased donor organs. Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb; 39(2):280-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  17. Taking DNA from the dead. Nat Rev Genet. 2010 May; 11(5):318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  18. The ethical use of existing samples for genome research. Genet Med. 2009 Oct; 11(10):712-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  19. Ethical, legal, and social considerations in conducting the Human Microbiome Project. Genome Res. 2008 Dec; 18(12):1861-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  20. Consent: informed, simple, implied and presumed. Am J Bioeth. 2007 Dec; 7(12):49-50; discussion W3-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  21. Genetics. No longer de-identified. Science. 2006 Apr 21; 312(5772):370-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  22. Respect as an organizing normative category for research ethics. Am J Bioeth. 2005; 5(1):W1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  23. Public Perspectives on Investigative Genetic Genealogy: Findings from a National Focus Group Study. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Oct-Dec; 15(4):280-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  24. A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 06; 140(1):54-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  25. Deciding with Others: Interdependent Decision-Making. Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 11; 52(6):23-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  26. Parental interest in genomic sequencing of newborns: enrollment experience from the BabySeq Project. Genet Med. 2019 03; 21(3):622-630.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  27. Navigating the research-clinical interface in genomic medicine: analysis from the CSER Consortium. Genet Med. 2018 04; 20(5):545-553.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  28. Confronting real time ethical, legal, and social issues in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium. Genet Med. 2010 Oct; 12(10):616-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  29. Beneficent persuasion: techniques and ethical guidelines to improve patients' decisions. Ann Fam Med. 2010 May-Jun; 8(3):260-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  30. Developing a tissue resource to characterize the genome of pancreatic cancer. World J Surg. 2009 Apr; 33(4):723-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  31. Principal investigator views of the IRB system. Int J Med Sci. 2008 Apr 02; 5(2):68-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.