Connection

SHARON PLON to Genetic Testing

This is a "connection" page, showing publications SHARON PLON has written about Genetic Testing.
Connection Strength

5.810
  1. A family-based approach to cascade genetic testing in a pediatric cancer genetics clinic. Fam Cancer. 2024 Nov 20; 24(1):8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.594
  2. Ten Years of Incidental, Secondary, and Actionable Findings. N Engl J Med. 2023 Nov 09; 389(19):1813-1814.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.553
  3. The Ancestral Pace of Variant Reclassification. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 10 01; 110(10):1133-1134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.388
  4. Performance of ACMG-AMP Variant-Interpretation Guidelines among Nine Laboratories in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 06 02; 98(6):1067-1076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.329
  5. Molecular diagnostic experience of whole-exome sequencing in adult patients. Genet Med. 2016 07; 18(7):678-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.319
  6. Genetic diagnosis through whole-exome sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2014 03 13; 370(11):1068.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.283
  7. Genetic testing and cancer risk management recommendations by physicians for at-risk relatives. Genet Med. 2011 Feb; 13(2):148-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  8. Sequence variant classification and reporting: recommendations for improving the interpretation of cancer susceptibility genetic test results. Hum Mutat. 2008 Nov; 29(11):1282-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.195
  9. Pediatric Cancer Screening in Hereditary Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk Syndromes: An Update from the AACR Childhood Cancer Predisposition Working Group. Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Oct 15; 30(20):4566-4571.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  10. Adult-Onset Cancer Predisposition Syndromes in Children and Adolescents-To Test or not to Test? Clin Cancer Res. 2024 May 01; 30(9):1733-1738.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  11. Gene-specific ACMG/AMP classification criteria for germline APC variants: Recommendations from the ClinGen InSiGHT Hereditary Colorectal Cancer/Polyposis Variant Curation Expert Panel. Genet Med. 2024 02; 26(2):100992.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  12. Evolution of germline TP53 variant classification in children with cancer. Cancer Genet. 2022 06; 264-265:29-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  13. Mammography behavior after receiving a negative BRCA1 mutation test result in the Ashkenazim: a community-based study. Genet Med. 2000 Nov-Dec; 2(6):307-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.112
  14. Clinical Genetics Lacks Standard Definitions and Protocols for the Collection and Use of Diversity Measures. Am J Hum Genet. 2020 07 02; 107(1):72-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  15. Responsibility, culpability, and parental views on genomic testing for seriously ill children. Genet Med. 2019 12; 21(12):2791-2797.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  16. Psychological impact of receiving negative BRCA1 mutation test results in Ashkenazim. Genet Med. 1999 Mar-Apr; 1(3):74-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  17. Determining the clinical validity of hereditary colorectal cancer and polyposis susceptibility genes using the Clinical Genome Resource Clinical Validity Framework. Genet Med. 2019 07; 21(7):1507-1516.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  18. Integrating somatic variant data and biomarkers for germline variant classification in cancer predisposition genes. Hum Mutat. 2018 11; 39(11):1542-1552.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  19. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant curation guidelines for the analysis of germline CDH1 sequence variants. Hum Mutat. 2018 11; 39(11):1553-1568.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  20. Secondary findings from clinical genomic sequencing: prevalence, patient perspectives, family history assessment, and health-care costs from a multisite study. Genet Med. 2019 05; 21(5):1100-1110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  21. Screening and clinical implications for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 1998 Oct; 3(4):377-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  22. Genome-wide sequencing in acutely ill infants: genomic medicine's critical application? Genet Med. 2019 02; 21(2):498-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  23. Screening for 185delAG in the Ashkenazim. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 May; 60(5):1085-98.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  24. A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories. Genet Med. 2017 05; 19(5):575-582.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  25. Parent decision-making around the genetic testing of children for germline TP53 mutations. Cancer. 2015 Jan 15; 121(2):286-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  26. Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Genet Med. 2013 Nov; 15(11):860-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  27. Clinical whole-exome sequencing for the diagnosis of mendelian disorders. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 17; 369(16):1502-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  28. Experiences and attitudes of genome investigators regarding return of individual genetic test results. Genet Med. 2013 Nov; 15(11):882-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  29. The practice of adult genetics: a 7-year experience from a single center. Am J Med Genet A. 2013 Jan; 161A(1):89-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  30. Significant differences among physician specialties in management recommendations of BRCA1 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Aug; 129(1):221-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  31. Unifying cancer genetics. Genet Med. 2011 Mar; 13(3):203-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  32. Inherited susceptibility for pediatric cancer. Cancer J. 2005 Jul-Aug; 11(4):255-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  33. Genomic sequencing research in pediatric cancer care: Decision making, attitudes, and perceived utility among adolescents and young adults and their parents. Genet Med. 2024 Aug; 26(8):101168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  34. Germline Genetic Testing and Survival Outcomes Among Children With Rhabdomyosarcoma: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 03 04; 7(3):e244170.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  35. Cancer. A risky business--assessing breast cancer risk. Science. 2003 Oct 24; 302(5645):574-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  36. Primary care physicians' attitudes and practices regarding cancer genetics: a comparison of 2001 with 1996 survey results. J Cancer Educ. 2003; 18(2):91-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  37. Optimising clinical care through CDH1-specific germline variant curation: improvement of clinical assertions and updated curation guidelines. J Med Genet. 2023 06; 60(6):568-575.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  38. Counseling the at risk patient in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Era. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2002 Jun; 29(2):341-66, vii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  39. Standards for the classification of pathogenicity of somatic variants in cancer (oncogenicity): Joint recommendations of Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen), Cancer Genomics Consortium (CGC), and Variant Interpretation for Cancer Consortium (VICC). Genet Med. 2022 05; 24(5):986-998.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  40. ClinGen Variant Curation Interface: a variant classification platform for the application of evidence criteria from ACMG/AMP guidelines. Genome Med. 2022 01 18; 14(1):6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  41. Specifications of the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines for germline TP53 variants. Hum Mutat. 2021 03; 42(3):223-236.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  42. Points to consider for reporting of germline variation in patients undergoing tumor testing: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med. 2020 07; 22(7):1142-1148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  43. A brief history of human disease genetics. Nature. 2020 01; 577(7789):179-189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  44. Germline POLE mutation in a child with hypermutated medulloblastoma and features of constitutional mismatch repair deficiency. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud. 2019 10; 5(5).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  45. ClinGen Myeloid Malignancy Variant Curation Expert Panel recommendations for germline RUNX1 variants. Blood Adv. 2019 10 22; 3(20):2962-2979.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  46. Clinical validity assessment of genes frequently tested on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility sequencing panels. Genet Med. 2019 07; 21(7):1497-1506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  47. The clinical imperative for inclusivity: Race, ethnicity, and ancestry (REA) in genomics. Hum Mutat. 2018 11; 39(11):1713-1720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  48. Gene-specific criteria for PTEN variant curation: Recommendations from the ClinGen PTEN Expert Panel. Hum Mutat. 2018 11; 39(11):1581-1592.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  49. Updated recommendation for the benign stand-alone ACMG/AMP criterion. Hum Mutat. 2018 11; 39(11):1525-1530.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  50. The Future of Surveillance in the Context of Cancer Predisposition: Through the Murky Looking Glass. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 01; 23(21):e133-e137.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  51. Screening Children at Risk for Retinoblastoma: Consensus Report from the American Association of Ophthalmic Oncologists and Pathologists. Ophthalmology. 2018 03; 125(3):453-458.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  52. Cancer Screening Recommendations and Clinical Management of Inherited Gastrointestinal Cancer Syndromes in Childhood. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 07 01; 23(13):e107-e114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  53. Pediatric Cancer Predisposition and Surveillance: An Overview, and a Tribute to Alfred G. Knudson Jr. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Jun 01; 23(11):e1-e5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  54. Cancer genetics--survey of primary care physicians' attitudes and practices. J Cancer Educ. 1997; 12(4):199-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  55. ClinGen--the Clinical Genome Resource. N Engl J Med. 2015 06 04; 372(23):2235-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  56. Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing. JAMA. 2014 Nov 12; 312(18):1870-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  57. BRCA1/2 sequence variants of uncertain significance: a primer for providers to assist in discussions and in medical management. Oncologist. 2013; 18(5):518-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  58. Next-generation sequencing in the clinic: are we ready? Nat Rev Genet. 2012 11; 13(11):818-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  59. Outcomes of integrating genetics in management of patients with retinoblastoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov; 129(11):1428-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.