Connection

LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH to Conflict of Interest

This is a "connection" page, showing publications LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH has written about Conflict of Interest.
Connection Strength

3.837
  1. Fiduciary disparity clarity: Ethics of divided allegiances. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Feb; 63(2):546-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.477
  2. When is medical industry backing lacking? J Vasc Surg. 2012 Jun; 55(6):1810-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.370
  3. Business dealings with a patient: money never sleeps. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Mar; 53(3):856-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.339
  4. Conflict of credentialing: accolade or unfair trade. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Dec; 50(6):1511-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.311
  5. How do we guarantee trainee professional purity? J Vasc Surg. 2009 Mar; 49(3):790-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.295
  6. Intentional over-treatment: the unmentionable conflict-of-interest. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Sep; 46(3):605-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.266
  7. Are ethics practical when externals impact your clinical judgment? J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun; 45(6):1282-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.261
  8. An ethical framework for identifying, preventing, and managing conflicts confronting leaders of academic health centers. Acad Med. 2004 Nov; 79(11):1056-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  9. Nonmonetary conflicts of interest. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Dec; 36(6):1309-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  10. Surgeon-industry relationships: ethically responsible management of conflicts of interest. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Apr; 35(4):825-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  11. The ethics of insurance limiting institutional medical care: It's all about the money. J Vasc Surg. 2016 Apr; 63(4):1108-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  12. Medicine as a profession: a hypothetical imperative in clinical ethics. J Med Philos. 2015 Feb; 40(1):1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  13. Discovering overtreatment: second-opinion dilemma. J Vasc Surg. 2014 Dec; 60(6):1690-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  14. Extending life or prolonging death: when is enough actually too much? J Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug; 60(2):521-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  15. When money and principles clash: the ethics of a surgical teaching service. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Oct; 58(4):1115-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  16. A helping hand bitten: an ethical response to medical malpractice suits. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb; 43(2):422-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  17. An impaired surgeon, a conflict of interest, and supervisory responsibilities. Surgery. 2004 Apr; 135(4):449-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  18. HIV-infected surgeon: professional responsibility and self interest. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Apr; 37(4):914-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  19. Power, integrity, and trust in the managed practice of medicine: lessons from the history of medical ethics. Soc Philos Policy. 2002; 19(2):180-211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  20. A national survey of policies on disclosure of conflicts of interest in biomedical research. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 30; 343(22):1621-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  21. Laying medicine open: understanding major turning points in the history of medical ethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1999 Mar; 9(1):7-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  22. A basic concept in the clinical ethics of managed care: physicians and institutions as economically disciplined moral co-fiduciaries of populations of patients. J Med Philos. 1999 Feb; 24(1):77-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  23. Preventive ethics, managed practice, and the hospital ethics committee as a resource for physician executives. HEC Forum. 1998 Jun; 10(2):136-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  24. Consultation or corruption? The ethics of signing on to the medical-industrial complex. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Jan; 43(1):192-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  25. Sociopolitical and ethical considerations in the treatment of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Aug; 10(2):14A-7A.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.