LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH to Cesarean Section
This is a "connection" page, showing publications LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH has written about Cesarean Section.
Connection Strength
5.761
-
Written consent should not be obtained at the time of emergency caesarean section: AGAINST: Written consent should be obtained. BJOG. 2018 Dec; 125(13):1756.
Score: 0.484
-
RESPONDING PROFESSIONALLY TO REQUESTS FOR CESAREAN DELIVERY. Georgian Med News. 2017 Jul-Aug; (268-269):7-11.
Score: 0.439
-
Ethical issues in cesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Aug; 43:68-75.
Score: 0.426
-
Authors' reply re: Caesarean section should be available on request. BJOG. 2016 07; 123(8):1402-3.
Score: 0.409
-
Managing Care of an Intrapartum Patient with Agitation and Psychosis: Ethical and Legal Implications. AMA J Ethics. 2016 Mar 01; 18(3):209-14.
Score: 0.400
-
Authors' reply re: re: re: caesarean section should be available on request. BJOG. 2015 Oct; 122(11):1569-70.
Score: 0.389
-
Authors' reply re: re: re: caesarean section should be available on request. BJOG. 2015 Oct; 122(11):1570-1.
Score: 0.389
-
Authors' reply re: Caesarean section should be available on request. BJOG. 2015 Jun; 122(7):1032.
Score: 0.380
-
FOR: Responding professionally to requests for non-indicated caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2015 Feb; 122(3):360.
Score: 0.371
-
Preventive ethics for cesarean delivery: the time has come. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep; 209(3):166-7.
Score: 0.331
-
The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr; 27(2):153-64.
Score: 0.316
-
The professional responsibility model of respect for autonomy in decision making about cesarean delivery. Am J Bioeth. 2012; 12(7):1-2.
Score: 0.300
-
A case study in junk bioethics run amok. Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec; 11(12):59-61.
Score: 0.298
-
Critical appraisal of the proposed defenses for planned home birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 07; 221(1):30-34.
Score: 0.122
-
The importance of clinically and ethically fine-tuning decision-making about cesarean delivery. J Perinat Med. 2017 Jul 26; 45(5):551-557.
Score: 0.110
-
Planned home births: the need for additional contraindications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 04; 216(4):401.e1-401.e8.
Score: 0.107
-
Conflicts between physicians and patients in non-elective cesarean delivery: incidence and the adequacy of informed consent. Am J Perinatol. 1996 Apr; 13(3):171-6.
Score: 0.101
-
An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb; 87(2):302-5.
Score: 0.099
-
Is non-directive counseling for patient choice cesarean delivery ethically justified? J Perinat Med. 2007; 35(6):478-80.
Score: 0.053
-
Decision-making about caesarean delivery. Lancet. 2006 Mar 18; 367(9514):883-5.
Score: 0.050
-
Ethical considerations in elective cesarean delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun; 47(2):404-8.
Score: 0.044
-
The role of cephalocentesis in modern obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Sep; 185(3):734-6.
Score: 0.037
-
Subsequent pregnancy outcomes after open maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 05; 220(5):494.e1-494.e7.
Score: 0.031
-
Cesarean delivery for intrapartum fetal heart rate abnormalities: incorporating survey data into clinical judgment. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul; 88(1):60-4.
Score: 0.026
-
An ethical justification for emergency, coerced cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec; 82(6):1029-35.
Score: 0.021
-
Inadequacies with the ACOG and AAP statements on managing ethical conflict during the intrapartum period. J Clin Ethics. 1991; 2(1):23-4.
Score: 0.017
-
Ethical analysis of the intrapartum management of pregnancy complicated by fetal hydrocephalus with macrocephaly. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Nov; 68(5):720-5.
Score: 0.013