Header Logo

Connection

LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH to Pregnancy

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH has written about Pregnancy.
LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH
Connection Strength
5.502
Pregnancy
  1. Preventive ethics for including women of childbearing potential in clinical trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May; 194(5):1221-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  2. The fetus as a patient: an essential concept for the ethics of perinatal medicine. Am J Perinatol. 2003 Nov; 20(8):399-404.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  3. Undue burdens created by the Texas Abortion Law for vulnerable pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 04; 226(4):529-534.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  4. Professionally Responsible Counseling About Fetal Analysis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021 Dec; 48(4):777-785.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  5. Professional ethics and decision making in perinatology. Semin Perinatol. 2022 04; 46(3):151520.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  6. Induced abortion and COVID-19 as contributing factors to declining fertility in Sardinia. J Perinat Med. 2022 Jan 27; 50(1):42-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  7. Neonatal outcomes of births in freestanding birth centers and hospitals in the United States, 2016-2019. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 01; 226(1):116.e1-116.e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  8. Inclusion of pregnant individuals among priority populations for coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination for all 50 states in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 05; 224(5):536-539.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  9. Professionally responsible counseling about birth location during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Perinat Med. 2020 Jun 25; 48(5):450-452.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  10. US midwife-attended hospital births are increasing while physician-attended hospital births are decreasing: 2003-2018. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 09; 223(3):460-461.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  11. Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the?type of birth attendant. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 08; 223(2):254.e1-254.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  12. Ethical consideration of maternal participation in clinical research. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec; 11(6):549-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  13. Ethical considerations in research involving pregnant women. Womens Health Issues. 1999 Jul-Aug; 9(4):206-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  14. Preventing enthusiasm in response to clinical advances. BJOG. 2019 06; 126(7):890.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  15. Critical appraisal of the proposed defenses for planned home birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 07; 221(1):30-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  16. Written consent should not be obtained at the time of emergency caesarean section: AGAINST: Written consent should be obtained. BJOG. 2018 Dec; 125(13):1756.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  17. Editorial. J Perinat Med. 2018 Apr 25; 46(3):235-236.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  18. Perinatal critical care and ethics in perinatal medicine: the role of the perinatologist. J Perinat Med. 2017 Dec 20; 45(9):991-997.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  19. The ethics of maternal-fetal surgery. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 02; 23(1):64-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  20. Maternal inflammatory diet and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Circulating cytokines and genomic imprinting as potential regulators? Epigenetics. 2017 08; 12(8):688-697.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  21. Underlying causes of neonatal deaths in term singleton pregnancies: home births versus hospital births in the United States. J Perinat Med. 2017 Apr 01; 45(3):349-357.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  22. Serious adverse neonatal outcomes such as 5-minute Apgar score of zero and seizures or severe neurologic dysfunction are increased in planned home births after cesarean delivery. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0173952.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  23. Planned home births: the need for additional contraindications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 04; 216(4):401.e1-401.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  24. The unlimited-rights model of obstetric ethics threatens professionalism. BJOG. 2017 Jul; 124(8):1144-1147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  25. Ethical dimensions of the fetus as a patient. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Aug; 43:2-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  26. Ethical issues in cesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Aug; 43:68-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  27. Authors' reply re: Caesarean section should be available on request. BJOG. 2016 07; 123(8):1402-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  28. Neonatal Mortality of Planned Home Birth in the United States in Relation to Professional Certification of Birth Attendants. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0155721.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  29. Managing Care of an Intrapartum Patient with Agitation and Psychosis: Ethical and Legal Implications. AMA J Ethics. 2016 Mar 01; 18(3):209-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  30. Moral philosophy in perinatalology: A collaborative model for perinatal ethics. Semin Perinatol. 2016 06; 40(4):213-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  31. Healthcare justice and human rights in perinatal medicine. Semin Perinatol. 2016 06; 40(4):234-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  32. Ethics and professional responsibility: Essential dimensions of planned home birth. Semin Perinatol. 2016 06; 40(4):222-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  33. Reply. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb; 214(2):295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  34. Authors' reply re: re: re: caesarean section should be available on request. BJOG. 2015 Oct; 122(11):1569-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  35. Authors' reply re: re: re: caesarean section should be available on request. BJOG. 2015 Oct; 122(11):1570-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  36. Home birth is unsafe: FOR: The safety of planned homebirths: a clinical fiction. BJOG. 2015 Aug; 122(9):1235.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  37. Justified skepticism about Apgar scoring in out-of-hospital birth settings. J Perinat Med. 2015 Jul; 43(4):455-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  38. Is pharmacologic research on pregnant women with psychoses ethically permissible? J Perinat Med. 2015 Jul; 43(4):439-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  39. Ethics in perinatal medicine: A global perspective. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Oct; 20(5):364-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  40. Authors' reply re: Caesarean section should be available on request. BJOG. 2015 Jun; 122(7):1032.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  41. FOR: Responding professionally to requests for non-indicated caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2015 Feb; 122(3):360.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  42. Reply: To PMID 24662716. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb; 212(2):250-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  43. Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar; 212(3):350.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  44. The professional responsibility model and patient requests for nonindicated early delivery. Virtual Mentor. 2014 Oct 01; 16(10):793-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  45. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006-2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct; 211(4):390.e1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  46. Ethical dimensions of first-trimester fetal aneuploidy screening. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar; 57(1):226-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  47. Interventions at home births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May; 210(5):487-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  48. Ethical issues in periviable birth. Semin Perinatol. 2013 Dec; 37(6):422-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  49. Ethical issues in recommending and offering fetal therapy. West J Med. 1993 Sep; 159(3):369-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  50. Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct; 209(4):323.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  51. Professionally responsible intrapartum management of patients with major mental disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan; 210(1):27-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  52. Preventive ethics for cesarean delivery: the time has come. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep; 209(3):166-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  53. [Reply to the letter from Dr. Christine Loytved and Prof. Beate Sch?cking]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2013 Jun; 217(3):84-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  54. [Reply to the letter from Mrs. Nancy Stone and Mrs. Angelica Ensel ]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2013 Jun; 217(3):86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  55. Authors' response to: Fatally flawed? BJOG. 2013 Feb; 120(3):372-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  56. An ethical framework for conducting research on pregnant, opioid-dependent women. Addiction. 2013 Feb; 108(2):248-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  57. Ethical challenges in the management of multiple pregnancies: the professional responsibility model of perinatal ethics. J Perinat Med. 2013 Jan; 41(1):61-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  58. What is obstetric ethics? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Dec; 35(4):709-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  59. Letter to the editor regarding: Brown SD, Ecker JL, Ward JRM, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb; 208(2):159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  60. The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr; 27(2):153-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  61. Ethical dimensions of fetal neurology. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Oct; 17(5):252-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  62. Responsibly counselling women about the clinical management of pregnancies complicated by severe fetal anomalies. J Med Ethics. 2012 Jul; 38(7):397-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  63. Directive counseling about becoming pregnant. Virtual Mentor. 2012 Feb 01; 14(2):94-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  64. Dr. Goold's (2011) observations and criticisms. Letter to the editors. Am J Bioeth. 2012; 12(1):47-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  65. The professional responsibility model of respect for autonomy in decision making about cesarean delivery. Am J Bioeth. 2012; 12(7):1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  66. A case study in junk bioethics run amok. Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec; 11(12):59-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  67. The fetus as a patient and the ethics of human subjects research: response to commentaries on "An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients". Am J Bioeth. 2011 May; 11(5):W3-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  68. An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients. Am J Bioeth. 2011 May; 11(5):39-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  69. Inadequacies with the ACOG and AAP statements on managing ethical conflict during the intrapartum period. J Clin Ethics. 1991; 2(1):23-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  70. An ethically based standard of care for fetal therapy. J Matern Fetal Investig. 1991; 1:175-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  71. An ethical framework for the responsible management of pregnant patients in a medical disaster. J Clin Ethics. 2011; 22(1):20-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  72. A case study in unethical transgressive bioethics: "Letter of concern from bioethicists" about the prenatal administration of dexamethasone. Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep; 10(9):35-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  73. Ethical considerations in first-trimester Down syndrome risk assessment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr; 22(2):135-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  74. Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Feb; 162(2):303-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  75. An ethically justified practical approach to offering, recommending, performing, and referring for induced abortion and feticide. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec; 201(6):560.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  76. Sex determination by ultrasound: ethical challenges of sex ratio imbalances and invidious discrimination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep; 34(3):245-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  77. Women and children first: transforming a historic defining moment into a contemporary ethical imperative. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct; 201(4):351.e1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  78. Professional integrity, respect for autonomy, and the self-regulation of reproductive endocrinology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul; 201(1):3-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  79. How should the obstetrician respond to surrogate pregnancy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb; 33(2):131-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  80. Preventive ethics and subsequent care of patients self-administering ovarian stimulation for the management of infertility. J Clin Ethics. 2009; 20(3):239-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  81. The ethics of direct and indirect referral for termination of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep; 199(3):232.e1-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  82. A critical analysis of the concept and discourse of 'unborn child'. Am J Bioeth. 2008 Jul; 8(7):34-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  83. Ethical considerations in umbilical cord blood banking. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan; 111(1):178-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  84. Ethics of maternal-fetal surgery. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Dec; 12(6):426-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  85. A comprehensive ethical framework for responsibly designing and conducting pharmacologic research that involves pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):901-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  86. Implementation of first-trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21: ethical considerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun; 192(6):1777-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  87. An ethical critique of boutique fetal imaging:a case for the medicalization of fetal imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan; 192(1):31-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  88. Neglected ethical dimensions of the professional liability crisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May; 190(5):1198-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  89. Ethics of research and the pregnant patient. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003 Dec; 3(6):505-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  90. The Cornell University experience. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2003 Jul-Aug; 18(4):217-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  91. Ethics: an essential dimension of clinical obstetric anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2003 May; 96(5):1480-1485.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  92. Is third-trimester termination justified? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan; 21(1):97-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  93. An ethical framework for fetal research. Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass). 2003; 10(1):1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  94. Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep; 187(3):696-702.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  95. A comprehensive ethical framework for fetal research and its application to fetal surgery for spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul; 187(1):10-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  96. Placental Location in Maternal-Fetal Surgery for Myelomeningocele. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2022; 49(3):117-124.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  97. Reversing physician hesitancy to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 06; 226(6):805-812.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  98. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Beyond the scalpel: in utero fetal gene therapy and curative medicine. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 12; 225(6):B9-B18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  99. The role of cephalocentesis in modern obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Sep; 185(3):734-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  100. Professionally responsible management of the ethical and social challenges of antenatal screening and diagnosis of ?-thalassemia in a high-risk population. J Perinat Med. 2021 Sep 27; 49(7):847-852.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  101. Finely crafted distinctions and the art of clinical ethics. J Med Philos. 2001 Feb; 26(1):5-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  102. Professionally responsible coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination counseling of obstetrical and gynecologic patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 05; 224(5):470-478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  103. Associations between maternal obesity, gestational cytokine levels and child obesity in the NEST cohort. Pediatr Obes. 2021 07; 16(7):e12763.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  104. How fever is defined in COVID-19 publications: a disturbing lack of precision. J Perinat Med. 2021 Mar 26; 49(3):255-261.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  105. Professionally responsible advocacy for women and children first during the COVID-19 pandemic: guidance from World Association of Perinatal Medicine and International Academy of Perinatal Medicine. J Perinat Med. 2020 Nov 26; 48(9):867-873.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  106. Expanding the concept of the professional integrity of obstetrics during a public health emergency. J Perinat Med. 2020 Jun 25; 48(5):435-437.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  107. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Guidance on Behalf of the International Fetal Medicine and Surgery Society. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020; 47(9):689-698.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  108. Fetal interventions in the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: statement from the North American Fetal Therapy Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 08; 223(2):281-284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  109. Pregnant vs nonpregnant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and coronavirus disease 2019 hospital admissions: the first 4 weeks in New York. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 07; 223(1):126-127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  110. Elective delivery at 34?weeks vs routine obstetric care in fetal gastroschisis: randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 01; 55(1):15-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  111. Research on the fetus using Doppler ultrasound in the first trimester: guiding ethical considerations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Sep; 14(3):161.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  112. Overall gestational weight gain mediates the relationship between maternal and child obesity. BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 07; 19(1):1062.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  113. Ethical challenges in invasive maternal-fetal intervention. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2019 Aug; 28(4):150819.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  114. Subsequent pregnancy outcomes after open maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 05; 220(5):494.e1-494.e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  115. An Ethical Framework for Research in Maternal-Fetal Intervention in the Presence of Maternal Human Immunodeficiency Virus or Hepatitis B and C Infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 01; 133(1):48-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  116. Midwife-assisted planned home birth: an essential component of improving the safety of childbirth in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Perinat Med. 2018 Dec 19; 47(1):16-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  117. Professionally responsible management of gynecologic cancer in pregnancy when clinical resources are unavoidably limited. J Perinat Med. 2018 Sep 25; 46(7):811-813.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  118. Preventing incremental drift away from professionalism in graduate medical education. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 12; 219(6):589.e1-589.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  119. Guild interests: an insidious threat to professionalism in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 12; 219(6):581-584.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  120. Placentophagy among women planning community births in the United States: Frequency, rationale, and associated neonatal outcomes. Birth. 2019 03; 46(1):201-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  121. Ethical dimensions of ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Jun 18; 847:185-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  122. Should all pregnant women have an ultrasound examination? Croat Med J. 1998 Jun; 39(2):102-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  123. Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. An overview. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Dec; 75(1):91-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  124. Fetal analysis with invasive method (FA-I) and fetal analysis with non-invasive method (FA-NI): replacing current, deceptively imprecise clinical nomenclature. J Perinat Med. 2017 Nov 27; 45(8):985-987.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  125. Human placentophagy: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 04; 218(4):401.e1-401.e11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  126. Effect of advanced maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep; 216:178-183.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  127. The importance of clinically and ethically fine-tuning decision-making about cesarean delivery. J Perinat Med. 2017 Jul 26; 45(5):551-557.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  128. Evidence-based, ethically justified counseling for fetal bilateral renal agenesis. J Perinat Med. 2017 Jul 26; 45(5):585-594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  129. The European Court of Human Rights on planned home birth: resolution of a paradoxical ruling. BJOG. 2017 Sep; 124(10):1472-1473.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  130. Fulfilling professional responsibilities when counselling patients about Zika infection. BJOG. 2017 03; 124(4):550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  131. The impact of routine obstetric ultrasonographic screening in a low-risk population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov; 175(5):1142-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  132. Should sex identification be offered as part of the routine ultrasound examination? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov; 8(5):293-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  133. Ethical Dimensions of Counseling about the Clinical Management of Gestational Diabetes. Am J Perinatol. 2016 11; 33(13):1262-1265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  134. The fetus as a patient: an essential ethical concept for maternal-fetal medicine. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 May-Jun; 5(3):115-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  135. Conflicts between physicians and patients in non-elective cesarean delivery: incidence and the adequacy of informed consent. Am J Perinatol. 1996 Apr; 13(3):171-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  136. Single center experience in selective feticide in high-order multiple pregnancy: clinical and ethical issues. J Perinat Med. 2016 Mar; 44(2):161-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  137. Evidence-Based Management of Patients with 45,X/46,XY Gonadal Dysgenesis and Male Sex Assignment: from Infancy to Adulthood. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2016 Mar; 13(3):585-601.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  138. An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb; 87(2):302-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  139. Unusual pleuroamniotic shunt complication managed using a two-port in-CO2 fetoscopic technique: technical and ethical considerations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan; 47(1):123-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  140. Ethical implications for early pregnancy of the fetus as patient: a basic ethical concept in fetal medicine. Early Pregnancy. 1995 Dec; 1(4):253-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  141. Fetal tissue research: an ongoing story of professionally responsible success. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec; 213(6):819.e1-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  142. Routine obstetric ultrasound. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 Sep; 50(3):233-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  143. What is obstetric ethics? J Perinat Med. 1995; 23(5):331-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  144. The threat of the new managed practice of medicine to patients' autonomy. J Clin Ethics. 1995; 6(4):320-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  145. Is routine ultrasound screening for all patients? Clin Perinatol. 1994 Dec; 21(4):707-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  146. Reply: To PMID 24662716. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb; 212(2):254-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  147. Planned homebirth: not a Dutch treat for export. BJOG. 2015 Apr; 122(5):730.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  148. A clinical and ethical evaluation of routine obstetric ultrasound. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct; 6(5):435-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  149. Should all pregnant women have an ultrasound examination? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May 01; 4(3):177-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  150. Reply: To PMID 23791692. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr; 210(4):377-378.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  151. Deliberative clinical ethical judgment: an essential component of contemporary obstetrics. J Perinat Med. 2013 Nov; 41(6):627-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  152. Planned home birth: a violation of the best interests of the child standard? Pediatrics. 2013 Nov; 132(5):921-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  153. Rights-based reductionism--authors' reply. BJOG. 2013 Aug; 120(9):1153-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  154. The importance of ethics to the practice of obstetric ultrasound. Ann Med. 1993 Jun; 25(3):271-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  155. Reply: To PMID 23151491. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep; 209(3):281-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  156. Reply: To PMID 23151491. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep; 209(3):279-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  157. [Planned non-hospital births in industrialized countries: bureaucratic dream vs. professional responsibility]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2013 Feb; 217(1):7-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  158. Reply: To PMID 23151491. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul; 209(1):73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  159. Planned home birth in the United States and professionalism: a critical assessment. J Clin Ethics. 2013; 24(3):184-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  160. Clinical management of brain death during pregnancy. J Clin Ethics. 1993; 4(4):349-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  161. Planned home birth: the professional responsibility response. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan; 208(1):31-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  162. Ethically justified guidelines for family planning interventions to prevent pregnancy in female patients with chronic mental illness. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul; 167(1):19-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  163. An official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology clinical practice guideline: evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov 15; 184(10):1200-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  164. Obstetric ethics: an essential dimension of planned home birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May; 117(5):1183-1187.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  165. The fetus as patient: implications for directive versus nondirective counseling for fetal benefit. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1991; 6(1-2):93-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  166. Respect for the autonomy of the pregnant woman in surrogacy agreements: an elaboration of a fundamental ethical concern. Womens Health Issues. 1991; 1(3):143-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  167. Ethics, an emerging subdiscipline of obstetric ultrasound, and its relevance to the routine obstetric scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jan 01; 1(1):18-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  168. Does obstetric ethics have any role in the obstetrician's response to the abortion controversy? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Nov; 163(5 Pt 1):1425-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  169. Ethical dimensions of periviability. J Perinat Med. 2010 11; 38(6):579-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  170. The perils of the imperfect expectation of the perfect baby. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug; 203(2):101.e1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  171. NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010 Mar 10; 27(3):1-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  172. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive management strategy for third-trimester pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):311-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  173. Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies. Lancet. 1990 Jan 13; 335(8681):90-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  174. Improving obstetric estimation of outcomes of extremely premature neonates: an evolving challenge. J Perinat Med. 2010; 38(1):19-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  175. Preventive ethics strategies for drug abuse during pregnancy. J Clin Ethics. 1990; 1(2):157-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  176. Ethics in obstetric ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 1989 Sep; 8(9):493-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  177. Nonaggressive obstetric management. An option for some fetal anomalies during the third trimester. JAMA. 1989 Jun 16; 261(23):3439-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  178. The Groningen Protocol: is it necessary? Is it scientific? Is it ethical? J Perinat Med. 2009; 37(3):199-205.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  179. The ethics of randomized placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants with pregnant women: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec; 112(6):1361-1368.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  180. Enhancing patient autonomy with risk assessment and invasive diagnosis: an ethical solution to a clinical challenge. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul; 199(1):19.e1-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  181. Ethical considerations of early (first vs. second trimester) risk assessment disclosure for trisomy 21 and patient choice in screening versus diagnostic testing. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2007 Feb 15; 145C(1):99-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  182. An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive approach to peri-viability: gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal and neonatal dimensions. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Jan; 27(1):3-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  183. Umbilical cord blood collection: do patients really understand? J Perinat Med. 2007; 35(4):314-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  184. Is non-directive counseling for patient choice cesarean delivery ethically justified? J Perinat Med. 2007; 35(6):478-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  185. Ethical analysis of the intrapartum management of pregnancy complicated by fetal hydrocephalus with macrocephaly. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Nov; 68(5):720-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  186. Why the Groningen Protocol should be rejected. Hastings Cent Rep. 2006 Sep-Oct; 36(5):30-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  187. Further evidence for first-trimester risk assessment as an autonomy-enhancing strategy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr; 27(4):355.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  188. Decision-making about caesarean delivery. Lancet. 2006 Mar 18; 367(9514):883-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  189. Perinatal ethics: a practical method of analysis of obligations to mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Sep; 66(3):442-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  190. Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant women about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug; 193(2):322-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  191. Ethical considerations in elective cesarean delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun; 47(2):404-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  192. Is nuchal translucency screening associated with different rates of invasive testing in an older obstetric population? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar; 190(3):769-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  193. A clinically comprehensive ethical framework for offering and recommending cancer treatment before and during pregnancy. Cancer. 2004 Jan 15; 100(2):215-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  194. Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2004; 30(3):659-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  195. Ethical issues in the management of pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003 Jul; 58(7):473-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  196. Enhancing decision-making by depressed pregnant patients. J Perinat Med. 2002; 30(4):349-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  197. Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: the time for first-trimester nuchal translucency has come. J Ultrasound Med. 2001 Nov; 20(11):1147-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  198. Ethical dimensions of the number of embryos to be transferred in in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 Nov; 18(11):583-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  199. Ethical implications of aggressive obstetric management at less than 28 weeks of gestation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Feb; 80(2):120-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  200. Third trimester abortion: is compassion enough? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Apr; 106(4):293-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  201. Sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies in chronically ill psychiatric patients. Med J Aust. 1997 Mar 03; 166(5):231-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  202. Clinical implications of respect for autonomy in the psychiatric treatment of pregnant patients with depression. Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Feb; 48(2):209-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  203. Clinical implications and management strategies when depression occurs during pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Nov; 36(4):424-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  204. Cesarean delivery for intrapartum fetal heart rate abnormalities: incorporating survey data into clinical judgment. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul; 88(1):60-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  205. Ethically justified clinically comprehensive guidelines for the management of the depressed pregnant patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan; 174(1 Pt 1):169-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  206. Three ethically justified indications for selective termination in multifetal pregnancy: a practical and comprehensive management strategy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995 Sep; 12(8):531-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  207. Sexually transmitted disease prevention services for female chronically mentally ill patients. Community Ment Health J. 1995 Aug; 31(4):303-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  208. Is third trimester abortion justified? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Jun; 102(6):434-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  209. An ethical justification for emergency, coerced cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec; 82(6):1029-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  210. Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul; 44(7):671-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  211. Should all pregnant patients be offered prenatal diagnosis regardless of age? Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Apr; 81(4):615-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  212. Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: an indication for obstetric ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Oct; 161(4):857-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.