LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH to Pregnancy
This is a "connection" page, showing publications LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH has written about Pregnancy.
Connection Strength
5.625
-
Preventive ethics for including women of childbearing potential in clinical trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May; 194(5):1221-7.
Score: 0.106
-
The fetus as a patient: an essential concept for the ethics of perinatal medicine. Am J Perinatol. 2003 Nov; 20(8):399-404.
Score: 0.089
-
Undue burdens created by the Texas Abortion Law for vulnerable pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 04; 226(4):529-534.
Score: 0.078
-
Professionally Responsible Counseling About Fetal Analysis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2021 Dec; 48(4):777-785.
Score: 0.078
-
Professional ethics and decision making in perinatology. Semin Perinatol. 2022 04; 46(3):151520.
Score: 0.078
-
Induced abortion and COVID-19 as contributing factors to declining fertility in Sardinia. J Perinat Med. 2022 Jan 27; 50(1):42-45.
Score: 0.077
-
Neonatal outcomes of births in freestanding birth centers and hospitals in the United States, 2016-2019. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 01; 226(1):116.e1-116.e7.
Score: 0.076
-
Inclusion of pregnant individuals among priority populations for coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination for all 50 states in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 05; 224(5):536-539.
Score: 0.074
-
Professionally responsible counseling about birth location during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Perinat Med. 2020 Jun 25; 48(5):450-452.
Score: 0.071
-
US midwife-attended hospital births are increasing while physician-attended hospital births are decreasing: 2003-2018. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 09; 223(3):460-461.
Score: 0.070
-
Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the?type of birth attendant. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 08; 223(2):254.e1-254.e8.
Score: 0.069
-
Ethical consideration of maternal participation in clinical research. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec; 11(6):549-51.
Score: 0.068
-
Ethical considerations in research involving pregnant women. Womens Health Issues. 1999 Jul-Aug; 9(4):206-7.
Score: 0.066
-
Preventing enthusiasm in response to clinical advances. BJOG. 2019 06; 126(7):890.
Score: 0.065
-
Critical appraisal of the proposed defenses for planned home birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 07; 221(1):30-34.
Score: 0.064
-
Written consent should not be obtained at the time of emergency caesarean section: AGAINST: Written consent should be obtained. BJOG. 2018 Dec; 125(13):1756.
Score: 0.063
-
Editorial. J Perinat Med. 2018 Apr 25; 46(3):235-236.
Score: 0.061
-
Perinatal critical care and ethics in perinatal medicine: the role of the perinatologist. J Perinat Med. 2017 Dec 20; 45(9):991-997.
Score: 0.059
-
The ethics of maternal-fetal surgery. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 02; 23(1):64-67.
Score: 0.059
-
Underlying causes of neonatal deaths in term singleton pregnancies: home births versus hospital births in the United States. J Perinat Med. 2017 Apr 01; 45(3):349-357.
Score: 0.057
-
Serious adverse neonatal outcomes such as 5-minute Apgar score of zero and seizures or severe neurologic dysfunction are increased in planned home births after cesarean delivery. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0173952.
Score: 0.056
-
Planned home births: the need for additional contraindications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 04; 216(4):401.e1-401.e8.
Score: 0.056
-
The unlimited-rights model of obstetric ethics threatens professionalism. BJOG. 2017 Jul; 124(8):1144-1147.
Score: 0.056
-
Ethical dimensions of the fetus as a patient. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Aug; 43:2-9.
Score: 0.056
-
Ethical issues in cesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Aug; 43:68-75.
Score: 0.056
-
Authors' reply re: Caesarean section should be available on request. BJOG. 2016 07; 123(8):1402-3.
Score: 0.054
-
Neonatal Mortality of Planned Home Birth in the United States in Relation to Professional Certification of Birth Attendants. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0155721.
Score: 0.053
-
Managing Care of an Intrapartum Patient with Agitation and Psychosis: Ethical and Legal Implications. AMA J Ethics. 2016 Mar 01; 18(3):209-14.
Score: 0.052
-
Moral philosophy in perinatalology: A collaborative model for perinatal ethics. Semin Perinatol. 2016 06; 40(4):213-5.
Score: 0.052
-
Healthcare justice and human rights in perinatal medicine. Semin Perinatol. 2016 06; 40(4):234-6.
Score: 0.052
-
Ethics and professional responsibility: Essential dimensions of planned home birth. Semin Perinatol. 2016 06; 40(4):222-6.
Score: 0.052
-
Reply. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb; 214(2):295.
Score: 0.051
-
Authors' reply re: re: re: caesarean section should be available on request. BJOG. 2015 Oct; 122(11):1569-70.
Score: 0.051
-
Authors' reply re: re: re: caesarean section should be available on request. BJOG. 2015 Oct; 122(11):1570-1.
Score: 0.051
-
Home birth is unsafe: FOR: The safety of planned homebirths: a clinical fiction. BJOG. 2015 Aug; 122(9):1235.
Score: 0.050
-
Justified skepticism about Apgar scoring in out-of-hospital birth settings. J Perinat Med. 2015 Jul; 43(4):455-60.
Score: 0.050
-
Is pharmacologic research on pregnant women with psychoses ethically permissible? J Perinat Med. 2015 Jul; 43(4):439-44.
Score: 0.050
-
Ethics in perinatal medicine: A global perspective. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Oct; 20(5):364-7.
Score: 0.050
-
Authors' reply re: Caesarean section should be available on request. BJOG. 2015 Jun; 122(7):1032.
Score: 0.050
-
FOR: Responding professionally to requests for non-indicated caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2015 Feb; 122(3):360.
Score: 0.049
-
Reply: To PMID 24662716. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb; 212(2):250-1.
Score: 0.048
-
Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar; 212(3):350.e1-6.
Score: 0.048
-
The professional responsibility model and patient requests for nonindicated early delivery. Virtual Mentor. 2014 Oct 01; 16(10):793-6.
Score: 0.048
-
Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006-2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct; 211(4):390.e1-7.
Score: 0.046
-
Ethical dimensions of first-trimester fetal aneuploidy screening. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar; 57(1):226-31.
Score: 0.046
-
Interventions at home births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May; 210(5):487-8.
Score: 0.045
-
Ethical issues in periviable birth. Semin Perinatol. 2013 Dec; 37(6):422-5.
Score: 0.045
-
Ethical issues in recommending and offering fetal therapy. West J Med. 1993 Sep; 159(3):369-99.
Score: 0.044
-
Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct; 209(4):323.e1-6.
Score: 0.044
-
Professionally responsible intrapartum management of patients with major mental disorders. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan; 210(1):27-31.
Score: 0.044
-
Preventive ethics for cesarean delivery: the time has come. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep; 209(3):166-7.
Score: 0.043
-
[Reply to the letter from Dr. Christine Loytved and Prof. Beate Sch?cking]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2013 Jun; 217(3):84-5.
Score: 0.043
-
[Reply to the letter from Mrs. Nancy Stone and Mrs. Angelica Ensel ]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2013 Jun; 217(3):86.
Score: 0.043
-
Authors' response to: Fatally flawed? BJOG. 2013 Feb; 120(3):372-3.
Score: 0.042
-
An ethical framework for conducting research on pregnant, opioid-dependent women. Addiction. 2013 Feb; 108(2):248-9.
Score: 0.042
-
Ethical challenges in the management of multiple pregnancies: the professional responsibility model of perinatal ethics. J Perinat Med. 2013 Jan; 41(1):61-4.
Score: 0.042
-
What is obstetric ethics? Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Dec; 35(4):709-19.
Score: 0.042
-
Letter to the editor regarding: Brown SD, Ecker JL, Ward JRM, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb; 208(2):159.
Score: 0.042
-
The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr; 27(2):153-64.
Score: 0.041
-
Ethical dimensions of fetal neurology. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Oct; 17(5):252-5.
Score: 0.041
-
Responsibly counselling women about the clinical management of pregnancies complicated by severe fetal anomalies. J Med Ethics. 2012 Jul; 38(7):397-8.
Score: 0.040
-
Directive counseling about becoming pregnant. Virtual Mentor. 2012 Feb 01; 14(2):94-8.
Score: 0.040
-
Dr. Goold's (2011) observations and criticisms. Letter to the editors. Am J Bioeth. 2012; 12(1):47-8.
Score: 0.039
-
The professional responsibility model of respect for autonomy in decision making about cesarean delivery. Am J Bioeth. 2012; 12(7):1-2.
Score: 0.039
-
A case study in junk bioethics run amok. Am J Bioeth. 2011 Dec; 11(12):59-61.
Score: 0.039
-
The fetus as a patient and the ethics of human subjects research: response to commentaries on "An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients". Am J Bioeth. 2011 May; 11(5):W3-7.
Score: 0.038
-
An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients. Am J Bioeth. 2011 May; 11(5):39-49.
Score: 0.038
-
An ethical framework for the responsible management of pregnant patients in a medical disaster. J Clin Ethics. 2011; 22(1):20-4.
Score: 0.037
-
Inadequacies with the ACOG and AAP statements on managing ethical conflict during the intrapartum period. J Clin Ethics. 1991; 2(1):23-4.
Score: 0.037
-
An ethically based standard of care for fetal therapy. J Matern Fetal Investig. 1991; 1:175-80.
Score: 0.037
-
A case study in unethical transgressive bioethics: "Letter of concern from bioethicists" about the prenatal administration of dexamethasone. Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep; 10(9):35-45.
Score: 0.036
-
Ethical considerations in first-trimester Down syndrome risk assessment. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr; 22(2):135-8.
Score: 0.035
-
Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Feb; 162(2):303-7.
Score: 0.034
-
An ethically justified practical approach to offering, recommending, performing, and referring for induced abortion and feticide. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Dec; 201(6):560.e1-6.
Score: 0.034
-
Sex determination by ultrasound: ethical challenges of sex ratio imbalances and invidious discrimination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep; 34(3):245-6.
Score: 0.033
-
Women and children first: transforming a historic defining moment into a contemporary ethical imperative. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct; 201(4):351.e1-5.
Score: 0.033
-
Professional integrity, respect for autonomy, and the self-regulation of reproductive endocrinology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul; 201(1):3-4.
Score: 0.033
-
How should the obstetrician respond to surrogate pregnancy? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb; 33(2):131-2.
Score: 0.032
-
Preventive ethics and subsequent care of patients self-administering ovarian stimulation for the management of infertility. J Clin Ethics. 2009; 20(3):239-40.
Score: 0.032
-
The ethics of direct and indirect referral for termination of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Sep; 199(3):232.e1-3.
Score: 0.031
-
A critical analysis of the concept and discourse of 'unborn child'. Am J Bioeth. 2008 Jul; 8(7):34-9.
Score: 0.031
-
Ethical considerations in umbilical cord blood banking. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan; 111(1):178-82.
Score: 0.030
-
Ethics of maternal-fetal surgery. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Dec; 12(6):426-31.
Score: 0.029
-
A comprehensive ethical framework for responsibly designing and conducting pharmacologic research that involves pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):901-7.
Score: 0.025
-
Implementation of first-trimester risk assessment for trisomy 21: ethical considerations. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jun; 192(6):1777-81.
Score: 0.025
-
An ethical critique of boutique fetal imaging:a case for the medicalization of fetal imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Jan; 192(1):31-3.
Score: 0.024
-
Neglected ethical dimensions of the professional liability crisis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 May; 190(5):1198-200.
Score: 0.023
-
Ethics of research and the pregnant patient. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003 Dec; 3(6):505-9.
Score: 0.022
-
The Cornell University experience. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2003 Jul-Aug; 18(4):217-22.
Score: 0.022
-
Ethics: an essential dimension of clinical obstetric anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2003 May; 96(5):1480-1485.
Score: 0.022
-
Is third-trimester termination justified? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan; 21(1):97-8.
Score: 0.021
-
An ethical framework for fetal research. Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass). 2003; 10(1):1-2.
Score: 0.021
-
Ethical challenges of decision making with pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Sep; 187(3):696-702.
Score: 0.021
-
A comprehensive ethical framework for fetal research and its application to fetal surgery for spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul; 187(1):10-4.
Score: 0.020
-
Reversing physician hesitancy to recommend COVID-19 vaccination for pregnant patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 06; 226(6):805-812.
Score: 0.019
-
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Beyond the scalpel: in utero fetal gene therapy and curative medicine. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 12; 225(6):B9-B18.
Score: 0.019
-
The role of cephalocentesis in modern obstetrics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Sep; 185(3):734-6.
Score: 0.019
-
Professionally responsible management of the ethical and social challenges of antenatal screening and diagnosis of ?-thalassemia in a high-risk population. J Perinat Med. 2021 Sep 27; 49(7):847-852.
Score: 0.019
-
Finely crafted distinctions and the art of clinical ethics. J Med Philos. 2001 Feb; 26(1):5-11.
Score: 0.018
-
Professionally responsible coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination counseling of obstetrical and gynecologic patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 05; 224(5):470-478.
Score: 0.018
-
How fever is defined in COVID-19 publications: a disturbing lack of precision. J Perinat Med. 2021 Mar 26; 49(3):255-261.
Score: 0.018
-
Professionally responsible advocacy for women and children first during the COVID-19 pandemic: guidance from World Association of Perinatal Medicine and International Academy of Perinatal Medicine. J Perinat Med. 2020 Nov 26; 48(9):867-873.
Score: 0.018
-
Expanding the concept of the professional integrity of obstetrics during a public health emergency. J Perinat Med. 2020 Jun 25; 48(5):435-437.
Score: 0.018
-
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Guidance on Behalf of the International Fetal Medicine and Surgery Society. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020; 47(9):689-698.
Score: 0.018
-
Fetal interventions in the setting of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: statement from the North American Fetal Therapy Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 08; 223(2):281-284.
Score: 0.017
-
Pregnant vs nonpregnant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and coronavirus disease 2019 hospital admissions: the first 4 weeks in New York. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 07; 223(1):126-127.
Score: 0.017
-
Elective delivery at 34?weeks vs routine obstetric care in fetal gastroschisis: randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 01; 55(1):15-19.
Score: 0.017
-
Research on the fetus using Doppler ultrasound in the first trimester: guiding ethical considerations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Sep; 14(3):161.
Score: 0.017
-
Ethical challenges in invasive maternal-fetal intervention. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2019 Aug; 28(4):150819.
Score: 0.017
-
Subsequent pregnancy outcomes after open maternal-fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 05; 220(5):494.e1-494.e7.
Score: 0.016
-
An Ethical Framework for Research in Maternal-Fetal Intervention in the Presence of Maternal Human Immunodeficiency Virus or Hepatitis B and C Infection. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 01; 133(1):48-52.
Score: 0.016
-
Midwife-assisted planned home birth: an essential component of improving the safety of childbirth in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Perinat Med. 2018 Dec 19; 47(1):16-21.
Score: 0.016
-
Professionally responsible management of gynecologic cancer in pregnancy when clinical resources are unavoidably limited. J Perinat Med. 2018 Sep 25; 46(7):811-813.
Score: 0.016
-
Preventing incremental drift away from professionalism in graduate medical education. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 12; 219(6):589.e1-589.e3.
Score: 0.016
-
Guild interests: an insidious threat to professionalism in obstetrics and gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 12; 219(6):581-584.
Score: 0.016
-
Placentophagy among women planning community births in the United States: Frequency, rationale, and associated neonatal outcomes. Birth. 2019 03; 46(1):201-202.
Score: 0.015
-
Ethical dimensions of ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Jun 18; 847:185-90.
Score: 0.015
-
Should all pregnant women have an ultrasound examination? Croat Med J. 1998 Jun; 39(2):102-6.
Score: 0.015
-
Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. An overview. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Dec; 75(1):91-4.
Score: 0.015
-
Fetal analysis with invasive method (FA-I) and fetal analysis with non-invasive method (FA-NI): replacing current, deceptively imprecise clinical nomenclature. J Perinat Med. 2017 Nov 27; 45(8):985-987.
Score: 0.015
-
Human placentophagy: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 04; 218(4):401.e1-401.e11.
Score: 0.015
-
Effect of advanced maternal age on maternal and neonatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep; 216:178-183.
Score: 0.014
-
The importance of clinically and ethically fine-tuning decision-making about cesarean delivery. J Perinat Med. 2017 Jul 26; 45(5):551-557.
Score: 0.014
-
Evidence-based, ethically justified counseling for fetal bilateral renal agenesis. J Perinat Med. 2017 Jul 26; 45(5):585-594.
Score: 0.014
-
The European Court of Human Rights on planned home birth: resolution of a paradoxical ruling. BJOG. 2017 Sep; 124(10):1472-1473.
Score: 0.014
-
Fulfilling professional responsibilities when counselling patients about Zika infection. BJOG. 2017 03; 124(4):550.
Score: 0.014
-
The impact of routine obstetric ultrasonographic screening in a low-risk population. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov; 175(5):1142-5.
Score: 0.014
-
Should sex identification be offered as part of the routine ultrasound examination? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov; 8(5):293-4.
Score: 0.014
-
Ethical Dimensions of Counseling about the Clinical Management of Gestational Diabetes. Am J Perinatol. 2016 11; 33(13):1262-1265.
Score: 0.013
-
The fetus as a patient: an essential ethical concept for maternal-fetal medicine. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 May-Jun; 5(3):115-9.
Score: 0.013
-
Conflicts between physicians and patients in non-elective cesarean delivery: incidence and the adequacy of informed consent. Am J Perinatol. 1996 Apr; 13(3):171-6.
Score: 0.013
-
Single center experience in selective feticide in high-order multiple pregnancy: clinical and ethical issues. J Perinat Med. 2016 Mar; 44(2):161-6.
Score: 0.013
-
Evidence-Based Management of Patients with 45,X/46,XY Gonadal Dysgenesis and Male Sex Assignment: from Infancy to Adulthood. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2016 Mar; 13(3):585-601.
Score: 0.013
-
An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb; 87(2):302-5.
Score: 0.013
-
Unusual pleuroamniotic shunt complication managed using a two-port in-CO2 fetoscopic technique: technical and ethical considerations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan; 47(1):123-4.
Score: 0.013
-
Ethical implications for early pregnancy of the fetus as patient: a basic ethical concept in fetal medicine. Early Pregnancy. 1995 Dec; 1(4):253-7.
Score: 0.013
-
Fetal tissue research: an ongoing story of professionally responsible success. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec; 213(6):819.e1-4.
Score: 0.013
-
Routine obstetric ultrasound. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1995 Sep; 50(3):233-42.
Score: 0.013
-
What is obstetric ethics? J Perinat Med. 1995; 23(5):331-41.
Score: 0.012
-
The threat of the new managed practice of medicine to patients' autonomy. J Clin Ethics. 1995; 6(4):320-3.
Score: 0.012
-
Is routine ultrasound screening for all patients? Clin Perinatol. 1994 Dec; 21(4):707-22.
Score: 0.012
-
Reply: To PMID 24662716. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb; 212(2):254-5.
Score: 0.012
-
Planned homebirth: not a Dutch treat for export. BJOG. 2015 Apr; 122(5):730.
Score: 0.012
-
A clinical and ethical evaluation of routine obstetric ultrasound. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct; 6(5):435-9.
Score: 0.012
-
Should all pregnant women have an ultrasound examination? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May 01; 4(3):177-80.
Score: 0.012
-
Reply: To PMID 23791692. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr; 210(4):377-378.
Score: 0.011
-
Deliberative clinical ethical judgment: an essential component of contemporary obstetrics. J Perinat Med. 2013 Nov; 41(6):627-30.
Score: 0.011
-
Planned home birth: a violation of the best interests of the child standard? Pediatrics. 2013 Nov; 132(5):921-3.
Score: 0.011
-
Rights-based reductionism--authors' reply. BJOG. 2013 Aug; 120(9):1153-4.
Score: 0.011
-
The importance of ethics to the practice of obstetric ultrasound. Ann Med. 1993 Jun; 25(3):271-3.
Score: 0.011
-
Reply: To PMID 23151491. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep; 209(3):281-2.
Score: 0.011
-
Reply: To PMID 23151491. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep; 209(3):279-80.
Score: 0.011
-
[Planned non-hospital births in industrialized countries: bureaucratic dream vs. professional responsibility]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2013 Feb; 217(1):7-13.
Score: 0.011
-
Reply: To PMID 23151491. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul; 209(1):73.
Score: 0.011
-
Clinical management of brain death during pregnancy. J Clin Ethics. 1993; 4(4):349-50.
Score: 0.011
-
Planned home birth in the United States and professionalism: a critical assessment. J Clin Ethics. 2013; 24(3):184-91.
Score: 0.011
-
Planned home birth: the professional responsibility response. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan; 208(1):31-8.
Score: 0.010
-
Ethically justified guidelines for family planning interventions to prevent pregnancy in female patients with chronic mental illness. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Jul; 167(1):19-25.
Score: 0.010
-
An official American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology clinical practice guideline: evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov 15; 184(10):1200-8.
Score: 0.010
-
Obstetric ethics: an essential dimension of planned home birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May; 117(5):1183-1187.
Score: 0.009
-
The fetus as patient: implications for directive versus nondirective counseling for fetal benefit. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1991; 6(1-2):93-100.
Score: 0.009
-
Respect for the autonomy of the pregnant woman in surrogacy agreements: an elaboration of a fundamental ethical concern. Womens Health Issues. 1991; 1(3):143-4.
Score: 0.009
-
Ethics, an emerging subdiscipline of obstetric ultrasound, and its relevance to the routine obstetric scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jan 01; 1(1):18-20.
Score: 0.009
-
Does obstetric ethics have any role in the obstetrician's response to the abortion controversy? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Nov; 163(5 Pt 1):1425-9.
Score: 0.009
-
Ethical dimensions of periviability. J Perinat Med. 2010 11; 38(6):579-83.
Score: 0.009
-
The perils of the imperfect expectation of the perfect baby. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug; 203(2):101.e1-5.
Score: 0.009
-
NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010 Mar 10; 27(3):1-42.
Score: 0.009
-
An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive management strategy for third-trimester pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):311-6.
Score: 0.009
-
Selective reduction of multifetal pregnancies. Lancet. 1990 Jan 13; 335(8681):90-3.
Score: 0.009
-
Improving obstetric estimation of outcomes of extremely premature neonates: an evolving challenge. J Perinat Med. 2010; 38(1):19-22.
Score: 0.009
-
Preventive ethics strategies for drug abuse during pregnancy. J Clin Ethics. 1990; 1(2):157-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Ethics in obstetric ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 1989 Sep; 8(9):493-7.
Score: 0.008
-
Nonaggressive obstetric management. An option for some fetal anomalies during the third trimester. JAMA. 1989 Jun 16; 261(23):3439-40.
Score: 0.008
-
The Groningen Protocol: is it necessary? Is it scientific? Is it ethical? J Perinat Med. 2009; 37(3):199-205.
Score: 0.008
-
The ethics of randomized placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants with pregnant women: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Dec; 112(6):1361-1368.
Score: 0.008
-
Enhancing patient autonomy with risk assessment and invasive diagnosis: an ethical solution to a clinical challenge. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul; 199(1):19.e1-4.
Score: 0.008
-
Ethical considerations of early (first vs. second trimester) risk assessment disclosure for trisomy 21 and patient choice in screening versus diagnostic testing. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2007 Feb 15; 145C(1):99-104.
Score: 0.007
-
An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive approach to peri-viability: gynaecological, obstetric, perinatal and neonatal dimensions. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Jan; 27(1):3-7.
Score: 0.007
-
Umbilical cord blood collection: do patients really understand? J Perinat Med. 2007; 35(4):314-21.
Score: 0.007
-
Is non-directive counseling for patient choice cesarean delivery ethically justified? J Perinat Med. 2007; 35(6):478-80.
Score: 0.007
-
Ethical analysis of the intrapartum management of pregnancy complicated by fetal hydrocephalus with macrocephaly. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Nov; 68(5):720-5.
Score: 0.007
-
Why the Groningen Protocol should be rejected. Hastings Cent Rep. 2006 Sep-Oct; 36(5):30-3.
Score: 0.007
-
Further evidence for first-trimester risk assessment as an autonomy-enhancing strategy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Apr; 27(4):355.
Score: 0.007
-
Decision-making about caesarean delivery. Lancet. 2006 Mar 18; 367(9514):883-5.
Score: 0.007
-
Perinatal ethics: a practical method of analysis of obligations to mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Sep; 66(3):442-6.
Score: 0.006
-
Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant women about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug; 193(2):322-6.
Score: 0.006
-
Ethical considerations in elective cesarean delivery. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jun; 47(2):404-8.
Score: 0.006
-
Is nuchal translucency screening associated with different rates of invasive testing in an older obstetric population? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar; 190(3):769-74.
Score: 0.006
-
A clinically comprehensive ethical framework for offering and recommending cancer treatment before and during pregnancy. Cancer. 2004 Jan 15; 100(2):215-22.
Score: 0.006
-
Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2004; 30(3):659-64.
Score: 0.006
-
Ethical issues in the management of pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003 Jul; 58(7):473-83.
Score: 0.005
-
Enhancing decision-making by depressed pregnant patients. J Perinat Med. 2002; 30(4):349-51.
Score: 0.005
-
Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: the time for first-trimester nuchal translucency has come. J Ultrasound Med. 2001 Nov; 20(11):1147-52.
Score: 0.005
-
Ethical dimensions of the number of embryos to be transferred in in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 Nov; 18(11):583-7.
Score: 0.005
-
Ethical implications of aggressive obstetric management at less than 28 weeks of gestation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Feb; 80(2):120-5.
Score: 0.005
-
Third trimester abortion: is compassion enough? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Apr; 106(4):293-6.
Score: 0.004
-
Sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancies in chronically ill psychiatric patients. Med J Aust. 1997 Mar 03; 166(5):231-2.
Score: 0.004
-
Clinical implications of respect for autonomy in the psychiatric treatment of pregnant patients with depression. Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Feb; 48(2):209-12.
Score: 0.003
-
Clinical implications and management strategies when depression occurs during pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Nov; 36(4):424-9.
Score: 0.003
-
Cesarean delivery for intrapartum fetal heart rate abnormalities: incorporating survey data into clinical judgment. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jul; 88(1):60-4.
Score: 0.003
-
Ethically justified clinically comprehensive guidelines for the management of the depressed pregnant patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan; 174(1 Pt 1):169-73.
Score: 0.003
-
Three ethically justified indications for selective termination in multifetal pregnancy: a practical and comprehensive management strategy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995 Sep; 12(8):531-6.
Score: 0.003
-
Sexually transmitted disease prevention services for female chronically mentally ill patients. Community Ment Health J. 1995 Aug; 31(4):303-15.
Score: 0.003
-
Is third trimester abortion justified? Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995 Jun; 102(6):434-5.
Score: 0.003
-
An ethical justification for emergency, coerced cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec; 82(6):1029-35.
Score: 0.003
-
Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul; 44(7):671-4.
Score: 0.003
-
Should all pregnant patients be offered prenatal diagnosis regardless of age? Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Apr; 81(4):615-8.
Score: 0.003
-
Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: an indication for obstetric ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Oct; 161(4):857-60.
Score: 0.002