Header Logo

Connection

LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH to Home Childbirth

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH has written about Home Childbirth.
LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH
Connection Strength
9.570
Home Childbirth
  1. Neonatal mortality in the United States is related to location of birth (hospital versus home) rather than the?type of birth attendant. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 08; 223(2):254.e1-254.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.635
  2. Critical appraisal of the proposed defenses for planned home birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 07; 221(1):30-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.590
  3. Underlying causes of neonatal deaths in term singleton pregnancies: home births versus hospital births in the United States. J Perinat Med. 2017 Apr 01; 45(3):349-357.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.521
  4. Serious adverse neonatal outcomes such as 5-minute Apgar score of zero and seizures or severe neurologic dysfunction are increased in planned home births after cesarean delivery. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3):e0173952.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.520
  5. Planned home births: the need for additional contraindications. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 04; 216(4):401.e1-401.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.515
  6. Neonatal Mortality of Planned Home Birth in the United States in Relation to Professional Certification of Birth Attendants. PLoS One. 2016; 11(5):e0155721.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.491
  7. Ethics and professional responsibility: Essential dimensions of planned home birth. Semin Perinatol. 2016 06; 40(4):222-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.480
  8. Reply. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Feb; 214(2):295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.471
  9. Home birth is unsafe: FOR: The safety of planned homebirths: a clinical fiction. BJOG. 2015 Aug; 122(9):1235.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.465
  10. Justified skepticism about Apgar scoring in out-of-hospital birth settings. J Perinat Med. 2015 Jul; 43(4):455-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.462
  11. Reply: To PMID 24662716. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb; 212(2):250-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  12. Perinatal risks of planned home births in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Mar; 212(3):350.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  13. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006-2009. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct; 211(4):390.e1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.423
  14. Interventions at home births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 May; 210(5):487-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.414
  15. Apgar score of 0 at 5 minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct; 209(4):323.e1-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.401
  16. [Reply to the letter from Dr. Christine Loytved and Prof. Beate Sch?cking]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2013 Jun; 217(3):84-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.400
  17. [Reply to the letter from Mrs. Nancy Stone and Mrs. Angelica Ensel ]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2013 Jun; 217(3):86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.400
  18. Midwife-assisted planned home birth: an essential component of improving the safety of childbirth in Sub-Saharan Africa. J Perinat Med. 2018 Dec 19; 47(1):16-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  19. The European Court of Human Rights on planned home birth: resolution of a paradoxical ruling. BJOG. 2017 Sep; 124(10):1472-1473.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.132
  20. Authors' reply re: BJOG Debate 'Home birth is unsafe'. BJOG. 2016 06; 123(7):1232.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  21. Reply: To PMID 24662716. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Feb; 212(2):254-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  22. Planned homebirth: not a Dutch treat for export. BJOG. 2015 Apr; 122(5):730.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  23. Reply: To PMID 23791692. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr; 210(4):377-378.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  24. Planned home birth: a violation of the best interests of the child standard? Pediatrics. 2013 Nov; 132(5):921-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  25. Reply: To PMID 23151491. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep; 209(3):281-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  26. Reply: To PMID 23151491. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep; 209(3):279-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  27. [Planned non-hospital births in industrialized countries: bureaucratic dream vs. professional responsibility]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol. 2013 Feb; 217(1):7-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  28. Reply: To PMID 23151491. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul; 209(1):73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  29. Planned home birth in the United States and professionalism: a critical assessment. J Clin Ethics. 2013; 24(3):184-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  30. Planned home birth: the professional responsibility response. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan; 208(1):31-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  31. Obstetric ethics: an essential dimension of planned home birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May; 117(5):1183-1187.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.