LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH to Beneficence
This is a "connection" page, showing publications LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH has written about Beneficence.
Connection Strength
4.571
-
Beneficence and Wellbeing: A Critical Appraisal. Am J Bioeth. 2020 03; 20(3):65-68.
Score: 0.647
-
A critical analysis of the concept and discourse of 'unborn child'. Am J Bioeth. 2008 Jul; 8(7):34-9.
Score: 0.288
-
Professional ethics and decision making in perinatology. Semin Perinatol. 2022 04; 46(3):151520.
Score: 0.182
-
Ethical issues in gynecology. Ceska Gynekol. 1998 Apr; 63(2):103-7.
Score: 0.142
-
Ethics in obstetrics and gynecology. An overview. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Dec; 75(1):91-4.
Score: 0.138
-
RESPONDING PROFESSIONALLY TO REQUESTS FOR CESAREAN DELIVERY. Georgian Med News. 2017 Jul-Aug; (268-269):7-11.
Score: 0.134
-
Ethical dimensions of the fetus as a patient. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Aug; 43:2-9.
Score: 0.131
-
The fetus as a patient: an essential ethical concept for maternal-fetal medicine. J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 May-Jun; 5(3):115-9.
Score: 0.124
-
An ethically justified algorithm for offering, recommending, and performing cesarean delivery and its application in managed care practice. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb; 87(2):302-5.
Score: 0.122
-
Ethics in perinatal medicine: A global perspective. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Oct; 20(5):364-7.
Score: 0.116
-
FOR: Responding professionally to requests for non-indicated caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2015 Feb; 122(3):360.
Score: 0.114
-
The threat of the new managed practice of medicine to patients' autonomy. J Clin Ethics. 1995; 6(4):320-3.
Score: 0.113
-
Should we create a health care system in the United States? J Med Philos. 1994 Oct; 19(5):483-90.
Score: 0.111
-
Nonaggressive management of the illnesses of severely demented patients: an ethical justification. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994 Jun; 42(6):686-7.
Score: 0.109
-
Identifying and managing ethical conflict in the gynecologist-patient relationship. J Reprod Med. 1993 Jul; 38(7):533-7.
Score: 0.102
-
The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr; 27(2):153-64.
Score: 0.097
-
Justified limits on refusing intervention. Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 Mar-Apr; 21(2):12-8.
Score: 0.087
-
The fetus as patient: implications for directive versus nondirective counseling for fetal benefit. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1991; 6(1-2):93-100.
Score: 0.086
-
Inadequacies with the ACOG and AAP statements on managing ethical conflict during the intrapartum period. J Clin Ethics. 1991; 2(1):23-4.
Score: 0.086
-
An ethically based standard of care for fetal therapy. J Matern Fetal Investig. 1991; 1:175-80.
Score: 0.086
-
An ethical framework for the responsible management of pregnant patients in a medical disaster. J Clin Ethics. 2011; 22(1):20-4.
Score: 0.086
-
Cosmetic genetics and virtue-based restraints on autonomy. Am J Bioeth. 2010 Apr; 10(4):71-2.
Score: 0.081
-
An ethically justified, clinically comprehensive management strategy for third-trimester pregnancies complicated by fetal anomalies. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):311-6.
Score: 0.081
-
Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Feb; 162(2):303-7.
Score: 0.080
-
Nonaggressive obstetric management. An option for some fetal anomalies during the third trimester. JAMA. 1989 Jun 16; 261(23):3439-40.
Score: 0.077
-
An ethical model for improving the patient-physician relationship. Inquiry. 1988; 25(4):454-68.
Score: 0.070
-
The identification, management, and prevention of conflict with faculty and fellows: A practical ethical guide for department chairs and division chiefs. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec; 197(6):572.e1-5.
Score: 0.069
-
Perinatal ethics: a practical method of analysis of obligations to mother and fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Sep; 66(3):442-6.
Score: 0.059
-
The fetus as a patient: an essential concept for the ethics of perinatal medicine. Am J Perinatol. 2003 Nov; 20(8):399-404.
Score: 0.052
-
Physicians and hospital managers as cofiduciaries of patients: rhetoric or reality? J Healthc Manag. 2003 May-Jun; 48(3):172-9; discussion 180.
Score: 0.050
-
Power, integrity, and trust in the managed practice of medicine: lessons from the history of medical ethics. Soc Philos Policy. 2002; 19(2):180-211.
Score: 0.046
-
Expanding the concept of the professional integrity of obstetrics during a public health emergency. J Perinat Med. 2020 Jun 25; 48(5):435-437.
Score: 0.041
-
A basic concept in the clinical ethics of managed care: physicians and institutions as economically disciplined moral co-fiduciaries of populations of patients. J Med Philos. 1999 Feb; 24(1):77-97.
Score: 0.038
-
A transcultural, preventive ethics approach to critical-care medicine: restoring the critical care physician's power and authority. J Med Philos. 1998 Dec; 23(6):628-42.
Score: 0.037
-
Ethical considerations in the provision of controversial screening tests. Arch Fam Med. 1997 Sep-Oct; 6(5):486-90.
Score: 0.034
-
The importance of clinically and ethically fine-tuning decision-making about cesarean delivery. J Perinat Med. 2017 Jul 26; 45(5):551-557.
Score: 0.034
-
The limits of viability. J Perinat Med. 1997; 25(5):418-20.
Score: 0.032
-
Should sex identification be offered as part of the routine ultrasound examination? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Nov; 8(5):293-4.
Score: 0.032
-
Ethical Dimensions of Counseling about the Clinical Management of Gestational Diabetes. Am J Perinatol. 2016 11; 33(13):1262-1265.
Score: 0.031
-
Ethically justified clinically comprehensive guidelines for the management of the depressed pregnant patient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Jan; 174(1 Pt 1):169-73.
Score: 0.030
-
Virginity testing in professional obstetric and gynaecological ethics. Lancet. 2016 Jul 02; 388(10039):98-100.
Score: 0.030
-
What is obstetric ethics? J Perinat Med. 1995; 23(5):331-41.
Score: 0.028
-
A clinical and ethical evaluation of routine obstetric ultrasound. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct; 6(5):435-9.
Score: 0.028
-
A methodology for teaching ethics in the clinical setting: a clinical handbook for medical ethics. Theor Med. 1994 Mar; 15(1):39-52.
Score: 0.027
-
An ethical justification for emergency, coerced cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Dec; 82(6):1029-35.
Score: 0.026
-
Ethical issues in recommending and offering fetal therapy. West J Med. 1993 Sep; 159(3):369-99.
Score: 0.026
-
Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul; 44(7):671-4.
Score: 0.025
-
The importance of ethics to the practice of obstetric ultrasound. Ann Med. 1993 Jun; 25(3):271-3.
Score: 0.025
-
Planned home birth in the United States and professionalism: a critical assessment. J Clin Ethics. 2013; 24(3):184-91.
Score: 0.025
-
Clinical management of brain death during pregnancy. J Clin Ethics. 1993; 4(4):349-50.
Score: 0.025
-
The values history. The evaluation of the patient's values and advance directives. J Fam Pract. 1991 Feb; 32(2):145-53.
Score: 0.022
-
Ethics, an emerging subdiscipline of obstetric ultrasound, and its relevance to the routine obstetric scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jan 01; 1(1):18-20.
Score: 0.021
-
Preventive ethics strategies for drug abuse during pregnancy. J Clin Ethics. 1990; 1(2):157-8.
Score: 0.020
-
Ethics in obstetric ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 1989 Sep; 8(9):493-7.
Score: 0.020
-
Ethical analysis of the intrapartum management of pregnancy complicated by fetal hydrocephalus with macrocephaly. Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Nov; 68(5):720-5.
Score: 0.016
-
Why the Groningen Protocol should be rejected. Hastings Cent Rep. 2006 Sep-Oct; 36(5):30-3.
Score: 0.016
-
Methodological concerns in bioethics. J Med Philos. 1986 Feb; 11(1):17-37.
Score: 0.015
-
Respect for autonomy and medical paternalism reconsidered. Theor Med. 1985 Oct; 6(3):295-308.
Score: 0.015
-
Missed expectations? Physicians' views of patients' participation in medical decision-making. Med Care. 2005 May; 43(5):466-70.
Score: 0.014
-
Ethics in dental medicine: a framework for moral responsibility in dental practice. J Dent Educ. 1985 Apr; 49(4):219-24.
Score: 0.014
-
A clinically comprehensive ethical framework for offering and recommending cancer treatment before and during pregnancy. Cancer. 2004 Jan 15; 100(2):215-22.
Score: 0.013
-
Ethical dimensions of the number of embryos to be transferred in in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001 Nov; 18(11):583-7.
Score: 0.011
-
Clinical implications of respect for autonomy in the psychiatric treatment of pregnant patients with depression. Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Feb; 48(2):209-12.
Score: 0.008
-
Three ethically justified indications for selective termination in multifetal pregnancy: a practical and comprehensive management strategy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995 Sep; 12(8):531-6.
Score: 0.007
-
Should all pregnant patients be offered prenatal diagnosis regardless of age? Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Apr; 81(4):615-8.
Score: 0.006
-
Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: an indication for obstetric ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Oct; 161(4):857-60.
Score: 0.005
-
Sociopolitical and ethical considerations in the treatment of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Aug; 10(2):14A-7A.
Score: 0.004