LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH to Informed Consent
This is a "connection" page, showing publications LAURENCE MCCULLOUGH has written about Informed Consent.
Connection Strength
9.914
-
Written consent should not be obtained at the time of emergency caesarean section: AGAINST: Written consent should be obtained. BJOG. 2018 Dec; 125(13):1756.
Score: 0.503
-
Ethical issues in cesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Aug; 43:68-75.
Score: 0.443
-
Healthcare justice and human rights in perinatal medicine. Semin Perinatol. 2016 06; 40(4):234-6.
Score: 0.413
-
What is meant by high-risk informed consent? J Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug; 62(2):510-1.
Score: 0.399
-
FOR: Responding professionally to requests for non-indicated caesarean delivery. BJOG. 2015 Feb; 122(3):360.
Score: 0.386
-
Is "your only hope" medical treatment choice really a choice? J Vasc Surg. 2014 Oct; 60(4):1083-4.
Score: 0.377
-
Defining, aligning, or declining do not resuscitate during surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2014 Apr; 59(4):1152-3.
Score: 0.364
-
Ethical dimensions of first-trimester fetal aneuploidy screening. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Mar; 57(1):226-31.
Score: 0.362
-
Preventive ethics for cesarean delivery: the time has come. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep; 209(3):166-7.
Score: 0.344
-
Discontent with operative consent. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr; 55(4):1185-6.
Score: 0.317
-
How informed need be informed consent? J Vasc Surg. 2011 Dec; 54(6):1830-1.
Score: 0.310
-
An ethical framework for the responsible leadership of accountable care organizations. Am J Med Qual. 2012 May-Jun; 27(3):189-94.
Score: 0.309
-
An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients. Am J Bioeth. 2011 May; 11(5):39-49.
Score: 0.297
-
Toward ethical best practices in community consultation for research conducted with waiver of informed consent. Crit Care Med. 2008 Mar; 36(3):993-4.
Score: 0.239
-
The shifting sands of senility: canceled consent. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jan; 47(1):237-8.
Score: 0.236
-
Professional responsibility and individual conscience: protecting the informed consent process from impermissible bias. J Clin Ethics. 2008; 19(1):24-5.
Score: 0.236
-
Consent: informed, simple, implied and presumed. Am J Bioeth. 2007 Dec; 7(12):49-50; discussion W3-4.
Score: 0.235
-
The extent of informed consent. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Oct; 46(4):821-2.
Score: 0.232
-
A typology of shared decision making, informed consent, and simple consent. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jan 06; 140(1):54-9.
Score: 0.179
-
Consent for residents to perform surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2002 Sep; 36(3):655-6.
Score: 0.163
-
Consent for an intraoperative video record. J Vasc Surg. 2001 Dec; 34(6):1133-4.
Score: 0.155
-
Professional integrity in maternal?- fetal innovation and research: an essential component of perinatal medicine. J Perinat Med. 2021 Nov 25; 49(9):1027-1032.
Score: 0.149
-
Ethical dimensions of ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998 Jun 18; 847:185-90.
Score: 0.122
-
RESPONDING PROFESSIONALLY TO REQUESTS FOR CESAREAN DELIVERY. Georgian Med News. 2017 Jul-Aug; (268-269):7-11.
Score: 0.114
-
Conflicts between physicians and patients in non-elective cesarean delivery: incidence and the adequacy of informed consent. Am J Perinatol. 1996 Apr; 13(3):171-6.
Score: 0.105
-
When Participants in Genomic Research Grow Up: Contact and Consent at the Age of Majority. J Pediatr. 2016 Jan; 168:226-231.e1.
Score: 0.101
-
Where does innovation adaptation end and experimentation begin? J Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct; 62(4):1074-5.
Score: 0.101
-
Obligations and frustrations with high-risk patients: ethics of physicians' evaluations. J Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb; 61(2):533-4.
Score: 0.096
-
Surgery without consent or miscommunication? A new look at a landmark legal case. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May; 212(5):586-90.
Score: 0.093
-
The OHRP and SUPPORT. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 20; 368(25):e36.
Score: 0.086
-
The professional responsibility model of obstetric ethics and caesarean delivery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr; 27(2):153-64.
Score: 0.082
-
Ethics of re-hearsing procedures on a corpse. J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep; 54(3):879-80.
Score: 0.076
-
The fetus as a patient and the ethics of human subjects research: response to commentaries on "An ethically justified framework for clinical investigation to benefit pregnant and fetal patients". Am J Bioeth. 2011 May; 11(5):W3-7.
Score: 0.074
-
The intellectual and moral integrity of bioethics: response to commentaries on "A case study in unethical transgressive bioethics: 'Letter of concern from bioethicists' about the prenatal administration of dexamethasone". Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep; 10(9):W3-5.
Score: 0.071
-
A case study in unethical transgressive bioethics: "Letter of concern from bioethicists" about the prenatal administration of dexamethasone. Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep; 10(9):35-45.
Score: 0.071
-
The ethical hierarchy of do not resuscitate orders: never say never. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov; 52(5):1384-6.
Score: 0.071
-
Reconceptualizing the experience of surrogate decision making: reports vs genuine decisions. Ann Fam Med. 2009 May-Jun; 7(3):249-53.
Score: 0.065
-
Patient autonomy for the management of chronic conditions: a two-component re-conceptualization. Am J Bioeth. 2009 Feb; 9(2):23-30.
Score: 0.064
-
Just how far goes DNR? J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec; 48(6):1630-2.
Score: 0.063
-
A national survey concerning the ethical aspects of informed consent and role of medical students. J Med Educ. 1988 Nov; 63(11):821-9.
Score: 0.063
-
Therapeutic boundary intersection disaffection. J Vasc Surg. 2008 May; 47(5):1116-8.
Score: 0.060
-
Enhancing patient autonomy with risk assessment and invasive diagnosis: an ethical solution to a clinical challenge. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jul; 199(1):19.e1-4.
Score: 0.060
-
Operative simulcasts: patient's donations to surgeon's education. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb; 47(2):476-7.
Score: 0.059
-
Ethical considerations in umbilical cord blood banking. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan; 111(1):178-82.
Score: 0.059
-
Informed consent policies governing medical students' interactions with patients. J Med Educ. 1987 Oct; 62(10):789-98.
Score: 0.058
-
Ethics of maternal-fetal surgery. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2007 Dec; 12(6):426-31.
Score: 0.057
-
Responses to open peer commentaries on "Physicians' silent decisions: because patient autonomy doesn't always come first". Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jul; 7(7):W1-3.
Score: 0.057
-
Community consultation in emergency research. Crit Care Med. 2006 Aug; 34(8):2049-52.
Score: 0.054
-
Scientifically and ethically responsible innovation and research in ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jul; 28(1):1-4.
Score: 0.053
-
Preventive ethics for including women of childbearing potential in clinical trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May; 194(5):1221-7.
Score: 0.052
-
Evidence-based obstetric ethics and informed decision-making by pregnant women about invasive diagnosis after first-trimester assessment of risk for trisomy 21. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Aug; 193(2):322-6.
Score: 0.050
-
Prescribing viagra in an ethically responsible fashion. J Med Philos. 2004 Dec; 29(6):739-49.
Score: 0.048
-
The ethics of innovative surgical approaches for well-established procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jul; 40(1):199-201.
Score: 0.046
-
Assisted and surrogate decision making for pregnant patients who have schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2004; 30(3):659-64.
Score: 0.045
-
Ethics of research and the pregnant patient. Curr Womens Health Rep. 2003 Dec; 3(6):505-9.
Score: 0.044
-
Improving informed consent: the medium is not the message. IRB. 2003 Sep-Oct; Suppl 25(5):S11-S19.
Score: 0.044
-
Withdrawal of operative consent. Surgery. 2003 Jun; 133(6):692-3.
Score: 0.043
-
Decisions to prolong life. New Physician. 1983; 32(9):31-2.
Score: 0.042
-
An ethical framework for fetal research. Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass). 2003; 10(1):1-2.
Score: 0.042
-
When does conventional surgical therapy become research? J Vasc Surg. 2002 Aug; 36(2):423-4.
Score: 0.041
-
A comprehensive ethical framework for fetal research and its application to fetal surgery for spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul; 187(1):10-4.
Score: 0.040
-
Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: the time for first-trimester nuchal translucency has come. J Ultrasound Med. 2001 Nov; 20(11):1147-52.
Score: 0.039
-
Professionally responsible coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination counseling of obstetrical and gynecologic patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 05; 224(5):470-478.
Score: 0.037
-
Informed consent and neuroanatomic correlates of intentionality and voluntariness among psychiatric patients. Psychiatr Serv. 2000 Dec; 51(12):1561-7.
Score: 0.036
-
Clinical and ethical implications of impaired executive control functions for patient autonomy. Psychiatr Serv. 2000 Mar; 51(3):359-63.
Score: 0.034
-
Ethical issues in genetics and aging: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention in the era of molecular medicine. Generations. 2000; 24(1):72-8.
Score: 0.034
-
Ethical challenges in invasive maternal-fetal intervention. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2019 Aug; 28(4):150819.
Score: 0.033
-
Ethical considerations in research involving pregnant women. Womens Health Issues. 1999 Jul-Aug; 9(4):206-7.
Score: 0.033
-
Fetal analysis with invasive method (FA-I) and fetal analysis with non-invasive method (FA-NI): replacing current, deceptively imprecise clinical nomenclature. J Perinat Med. 2017 Nov 27; 45(8):985-987.
Score: 0.029
-
Preventive ethics and end-of-life decisions. Womens Health Issues. 1996 Sep-Oct; 6(5):304-6.
Score: 0.027
-
Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome: Management Considerations from Infancy to Adulthood. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2015 Jun; 12(4):373-87.
Score: 0.025
-
Should all pregnant women have an ultrasound examination? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May 01; 4(3):177-80.
Score: 0.023
-
Ethical issues in recommending and offering fetal therapy. West J Med. 1993 Sep; 159(3):369-99.
Score: 0.022
-
Identifying and managing ethical conflict in the gynecologist-patient relationship. J Reprod Med. 1993 Jul; 38(7):533-7.
Score: 0.022
-
The importance of ethics to the practice of obstetric ultrasound. Ann Med. 1993 Jun; 25(3):271-3.
Score: 0.021
-
An ethically based standard of care for fetal therapy. J Matern Fetal Investig. 1991; 1:175-80.
Score: 0.018
-
Ethics, an emerging subdiscipline of obstetric ultrasound, and its relevance to the routine obstetric scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Jan 01; 1(1):18-20.
Score: 0.018
-
The perils of the imperfect expectation of the perfect baby. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug; 203(2):101.e1-5.
Score: 0.017
-
Informed consent and the "medical student psychiatrist". Acad Med. 1990 Feb; 65(2):127-8.
Score: 0.017
-
Clinical guides to preventing ethical conflicts between pregnant women and their physicians. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Feb; 162(2):303-7.
Score: 0.017
-
Preventive ethics strategies for drug abuse during pregnancy. J Clin Ethics. 1990; 1(2):157-8.
Score: 0.017
-
Prenatal informed consent for sonogram: an indication for obstetric ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Oct; 161(4):857-60.
Score: 0.017
-
Pelvic examinations by medical students. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Oct; 161(4):1013-4.
Score: 0.017
-
Nonaggressive obstetric management. An option for some fetal anomalies during the third trimester. JAMA. 1989 Jun 16; 261(23):3439-40.
Score: 0.016
-
The abstract character and transforming power of medical language. Soundings. 1989; 72(1):111-25.
Score: 0.016
-
DNA data sharing: research participants' perspectives. Genet Med. 2008 Jan; 10(1):46-53.
Score: 0.015
-
Ethical and legal implications of genetic testing in androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Pediatr. 2007 Apr; 150(4):434-8.
Score: 0.014
-
Umbilical cord blood collection: do patients really understand? J Perinat Med. 2007; 35(4):314-21.
Score: 0.014
-
Consensus and controversy in clinical research ethics. JAMA. 2005 Sep 21; 294(11):1411-4.
Score: 0.013
-
The ethical implications of medical student involvement in the care and assessment of patients in teaching hospitals--informed consent from patients for student involvement. Part I: A description of the origin and implementation of policies governing medical student interaction with patients and compliance with Federal and JCAH guidelines. Res Med Educ. 1985; 24:138-45.
Score: 0.012
-
The ethical implications of medical student involvement in the care and assessment of patients in teaching hospitals--informed consent from patients for student involvement. Part II: A description of student behavioral practices and perspectives on the issue of informed consent for their involvement in patient care and assessment. Res Med Educ. 1985; 24:146-53.
Score: 0.012
-
Ethics of surgical innovation to treat rare diseases. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Apr; 39(4):918-9.
Score: 0.011
-
Ethical dimensions of diagnosis: a case study and analysis. Metamedicine. 1981 Jun; 2(2):129-43.
Score: 0.009
-
Respecting the autonomy of chronic mentally ill women in decisions about contraception. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1993 Jul; 44(7):671-4.
Score: 0.005
-
Sociopolitical and ethical considerations in the treatment of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1987 Aug; 10(2):14A-7A.
Score: 0.004