Connection

JAMES JONES to Ethics, Medical

This is a "connection" page, showing publications JAMES JONES has written about Ethics, Medical.
Connection Strength

5.266
  1. To treat or not to treat: On what should surgical therapy be based? J Vasc Surg. 2015 Dec; 62(6):1658-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.408
  2. Where does innovation adaptation end and experimentation begin? J Vasc Surg. 2015 Oct; 62(4):1074-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.403
  3. Ethics of administrative guidance: how much is too much? J Vasc Surg. 2014 Jun; 59(6):1737-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.367
  4. Resolution of retribution. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jul; 48(1):244-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.242
  5. Operative simulcasts: patient's donations to surgeon's education. J Vasc Surg. 2008 Feb; 47(2):476-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.237
  6. Going public with amazing cases: fiat or fiasco? J Vasc Surg. 2007 May; 45(5):1084-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  7. Painted into a corner: unexpected complications in treating a Jehovah's Witness. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Aug; 44(2):425-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.213
  8. Consultation or corruption? The ethics of signing on to the medical-industrial complex. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Jan; 43(1):192-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  9. The ethics of operating on a family member. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Nov; 42(5):1033-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  10. Turf wars: the ethics of professional territorialism. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Sep; 42(3):587-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  11. Show me the money: the ethics of physicians' income. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Aug; 42(2):377-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  12. Damned if you do and damned if you don't: medical ethics and a second career. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Mar; 41(3):556-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  13. Ethics of the new economic credentialing: conflicted leadership roles. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Feb; 41(2):366-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  14. Ethical nuances of combining romance with medical practice. J Vasc Surg. 2005 Jan; 41(1):174-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  15. The military physician's ethical response to evidence of torture. Surgery. 2004 Nov; 136(5):1090-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  16. The ethics of personal advertising in surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Aug; 40(2):397-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.186
  17. Ethics of boutique medical practice. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jun; 39(6):1354-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.184
  18. Ethics of professional courtesy. J Vasc Surg. 2004 May; 39(5):1140-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  19. Ethics of surgical innovation to treat rare diseases. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Apr; 39(4):918-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  20. Ethics and commercial insurance. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Mar; 39(3):692-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.180
  21. Ethics of introducing new operating room technology. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Feb; 39(2):482-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.179
  22. Clinical disagreements between residents and faculty surgeons. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jan; 39(1):270-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  23. Surgical infomercials: the ethical price of stardom. J Vasc Surg. 2009 Jul; 50(1):214-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  24. A surgeon operates on his son: wisdom or hubris? Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Sep; 84(3):723-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  25. A comprehensive primer of surgical informed consent. Surg Clin North Am. 2007 Aug; 87(4):903-18, viii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  26. Ethics of over-scheduling: when enough becomes too much. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Mar; 45(3):635-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  27. Standard of care: what does it really mean? J Vasc Surg. 2004 Dec; 40(6):1255-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  28. Management of disagreements between attending and consulting physicians. J Vasc Surg. 2003 Nov; 38(5):1137-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.