CHAD SHAW to Chromosome Aberrations
This is a "connection" page, showing publications CHAD SHAW has written about Chromosome Aberrations.
Connection Strength
1.537
-
Interchromosomal template-switching as a novel molecular mechanism for imprinting perturbations associated with Temple syndrome. Genome Med. 2019 04 23; 11(1):25.
Score: 0.128
-
Reliable detection of subchromosomal deletions and duplications using cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn. 2018 12; 38(13):1069-1078.
Score: 0.124
-
An Organismal CNV Mutator Phenotype Restricted to Early Human Development. Cell. 2017 02 23; 168(5):830-842.e7.
Score: 0.110
-
Evidence for feasibility of fetal trophoblastic cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing. Prenat Diagn. 2016 Nov; 36(11):1009-1019.
Score: 0.107
-
Comparison of three whole genome amplification methods for detection of genomic aberrations in single cells. Prenat Diagn. 2016 Sep; 36(9):823-30.
Score: 0.106
-
Parent of origin, mosaicism, and recurrence risk: probabilistic modeling explains the broken symmetry of transmission genetics. Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Oct 02; 95(4):345-59.
Score: 0.093
-
Comparison of chromosome analysis and chromosomal microarray analysis: what is the value of chromosome analysis in today's genomic array era? Genet Med. 2013 Jun; 15(6):450-7.
Score: 0.082
-
Recurrent deletions and reciprocal duplications of 10q11.21q11.23 including CHAT and SLC18A3 are likely mediated by complex low-copy repeats. Hum Mutat. 2012 Jan; 33(1):165-79.
Score: 0.076
-
Array comparative genomic hybridization detects chromosomal abnormalities in hematological cancers that are not detected by conventional cytogenetics. J Mol Diagn. 2010 Sep; 12(5):670-9.
Score: 0.070
-
Microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization using sex-matched reference DNA provides greater sensitivity for detection of sex chromosome imbalances than array-comparative genomic hybridization with sex-mismatched reference DNA. J Mol Diagn. 2009 May; 11(3):226-37.
Score: 0.064
-
Genomic imbalances in neonates with birth defects: high detection rates by using chromosomal microarray analysis. Pediatrics. 2008 Dec; 122(6):1310-8.
Score: 0.062
-
Identification of chromosome abnormalities in subtelomeric regions by microarray analysis: a study of 5,380 cases. Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Sep 01; 146A(17):2242-51.
Score: 0.061
-
Validation of a targeted DNA microarray for the clinical evaluation of recurrent abnormalities in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2008 Jul; 83(7):540-6.
Score: 0.060
-
Characterization of Potocki-Lupski syndrome (dup(17)(p11.2p11.2)) and delineation of a dosage-sensitive critical interval that can convey an autism phenotype. Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Apr; 80(4):633-49.
Score: 0.055
-
Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med. 2006 Nov; 8(11):719-27.
Score: 0.054
-
High-resolution genomic profiling of chromosomal aberrations using Infinium whole-genome genotyping. Genome Res. 2006 Sep; 16(9):1136-48.
Score: 0.053
-
Array-based comparative genomic hybridization analysis of recurrent chromosome 15q rearrangements. Am J Med Genet A. 2005 Dec 01; 139A(2):106-13.
Score: 0.051
-
Development and validation of a CGH microarray for clinical cytogenetic diagnosis. Genet Med. 2005 Jul-Aug; 7(6):422-32.
Score: 0.049
-
Development of a comparative genomic hybridization microarray and demonstration of its utility with 25 well-characterized 1p36 deletions. Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Sep 01; 12(17):2145-52.
Score: 0.043
-
Copy number variant and runs of homozygosity detection by microarrays enabled more precise molecular diagnoses in 11,020 clinical exome cases. Genome Med. 2019 05 17; 11(1):30.
Score: 0.032
-
Somatic mosaicism detected by exon-targeted, high-resolution aCGH in 10,362 consecutive cases. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Aug; 22(8):969-78.
Score: 0.022
-
Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; experience with >1000 cases and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn. 2012 Apr; 32(4):351-61.
Score: 0.020
-
Microarray-based CGH detects chromosomal mosaicism not revealed by conventional cytogenetics. Am J Med Genet A. 2007 Aug 01; 143A(15):1679-86.
Score: 0.014