Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by HARDEEP SINGH and ASHLEY MEYER.
Connection Strength
13.844
-
Adherence to National Guidelines for Timeliness of Test Results Communication to Patients in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 04 01; 5(4):e228568.
Score: 0.832
-
Patient and clinician experiences of uncertainty in the diagnostic process: Current understanding and future directions. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 11; 104(11):2606-2615.
Score: 0.792
-
A Program to Provide Clinicians with Feedback on Their Diagnostic Performance in a Learning Health System. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 02; 47(2):120-126.
Score: 0.745
-
Patient Perspectives on the Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Symptom Checker: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 01 30; 22(1):e14679.
Score: 0.716
-
Pediatric clinician perspectives on communicating diagnostic uncertainty. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Nov 30; 31(9):G107-G112.
Score: 0.708
-
Recommendations for using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument to help measure and improve diagnostic safety. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 11 26; 6(4):315-323.
Score: 0.707
-
The Path to Diagnostic Excellence Includes Feedback to Calibrate How Clinicians Think. JAMA. 2019 Feb 26; 321(8):737-738.
Score: 0.671
-
Evaluating a mobile application for improving clinical laboratory test ordering and diagnosis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 07 01; 25(7):841-847.
Score: 0.642
-
Electronic Detection of Delayed Test Result Follow-Up in Patients with Hypothyroidism. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul; 32(7):753-759.
Score: 0.582
-
Calibrating how doctors think and seek information to minimise errors in diagnosis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 06; 26(6):436-438.
Score: 0.568
-
Communicating Findings of Delayed Diagnostic Evaluation to Primary Care Providers. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jul-Aug; 29(4):469-73.
Score: 0.559
-
Crowdsourcing Diagnosis for Patients With Undiagnosed Illnesses: An Evaluation of CrowdMed. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 14; 18(1):e12.
Score: 0.541
-
"Expert opinion" software for medical diagnosis and treatment-reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr; 174(4):639.
Score: 0.478
-
Physicians' diagnostic accuracy, confidence, and resource requests: a vignette study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 25; 173(21):1952-8.
Score: 0.466
-
A Virtual Breakthrough Series Collaborative for Missed Test Results: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 01; 7(10):e2440269.
Score: 0.247
-
Diagnostic error in mental health: a review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Sep 19; 33(10):663-672.
Score: 0.247
-
Medical Home Implementation and Follow-Up of Cancer-Related Abnormal Test Results in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 03 04; 7(3):e240087.
Score: 0.238
-
Managing Interruptions to Improve Diagnostic Decision-Making: Strategies and Recommended Research Agenda. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 05; 38(6):1526-1531.
Score: 0.220
-
Electronic Co-design (ECO-design) Workshop for Increasing Clinician Participation in the Design of Health Services Interventions: Participatory Design Approach. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 22; 9(3):e37313.
Score: 0.215
-
Cancer Evaluations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study Using National Veterans Affairs Data. Am J Prev Med. 2022 12; 63(6):1026-1030.
Score: 0.213
-
Electronic Health Records' Support for Primary Care Physicians' Situation Awareness: A Metanarrative Review. Hum Factors. 2023 Mar; 65(2):237-259.
Score: 0.196
-
Advancing Diagnostic Safety Research: Results of a Systematic Research Priority Setting Exercise. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 10; 36(10):2943-2951.
Score: 0.192
-
Application of electronic trigger tools to identify targets for improving diagnostic safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 02; 28(2):151-159.
Score: 0.163
-
Impact of a national QI programme on reducing electronic health record notifications to clinicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 01; 28(1):10-14.
Score: 0.157
-
Patient perspectives on how physicians communicate diagnostic uncertainty: An experimental vignette study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Feb 01; 30(1):2-8.
Score: 0.156
-
Electronic Triggers to Identify Delays in Follow-Up of Mammography: Harnessing the Power of Big Data in Health?Care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 02; 15(2):287-295.
Score: 0.153
-
Development and Validation of Trigger Algorithms to Identify Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation of Gastroenterological Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan; 16(1):90-98.
Score: 0.151
-
Application of Electronic Algorithms to Improve Diagnostic Evaluation for Bladder Cancer. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 03 22; 8(1):279-290.
Score: 0.147
-
Finding Diagnostic Errors in Children Admitted to the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar; 18(3):265-271.
Score: 0.146
-
Computerized Triggers of Big Data to Detect?Delays in Follow-up of Chest Imaging?Results. Chest. 2016 09; 150(3):613-20.
Score: 0.138
-
The Burden of Inbox Notifications in Commercial Electronic Health Records. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 176(4):559-60.
Score: 0.137
-
Accuracy of the Safer Dx Instrument to Identify Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 06; 31(6):602-8.
Score: 0.136
-
Online public reactions to frequency of diagnostic errors in US outpatient care. Diagnosis (Berl). 2016 03; 3(1):17-22.
Score: 0.136
-
Diagnostic errors related to acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2016 Apr; 33(4):253-9.
Score: 0.133
-
Electronic Trigger-Based Intervention to Reduce Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation for Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 01; 33(31):3560-7.
Score: 0.132
-
Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record-based Triggers to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Abnormal Lung Imaging Findings. Radiology. 2015 Oct; 277(1):81-7.
Score: 0.129
-
Evaluation of outcomes from a national patient-initiated second-opinion program. Am J Med. 2015 Oct; 128(10):1138.e25-33.
Score: 0.129
-
Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal imaging results and radiologists' recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Apr; 12(4):385-9.
Score: 0.126
-
Exploring new avenues to assess the sharp end of patient safety: an analysis of nationally aggregated peer review data. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec; 23(12):1023-30.
Score: 0.124
-
Developing checklists to prevent diagnostic error in Emergency Room settings. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 09; 1(3):223-231.
Score: 0.121
-
The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep; 23(9):727-31.
Score: 0.120
-
Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25; 173(6):418-25.
Score: 0.111
-
Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul; 21(7):535-57.
Score: 0.105
-
How is diagnostic uncertainty communicated and managed in real world primary care settings? BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 12; 25(1):296.
Score: 0.061
-
Errors in Diagnosis of Spinal Epidural Abscesses in the Era of Electronic Health Records. Am J Med. 2017 08; 130(8):975-981.
Score: 0.037
-
Workarounds and Test Results Follow-up in Electronic Health Record-Based Primary Care. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):543-59.
Score: 0.035
-
Patient-initiated second opinions: systematic review of characteristics and impact on diagnosis, treatment, and satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 May; 89(5):687-96.
Score: 0.030
-
Electronic health record-related safety concerns: a cross-sectional survey. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2014; 34(1):14-26.
Score: 0.029
-
Challenges of making a diagnosis in the outpatient setting: a multi-site survey of primary care physicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Aug; 21(8):641-8.
Score: 0.026