Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by HARDEEP SINGH and ASHLEY MEYER.
Connection Strength

13.760
  1. Adherence to National Guidelines for Timeliness of Test Results Communication to Patients in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 04 01; 5(4):e228568.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.827
  2. Patient and clinician experiences of uncertainty in the diagnostic process: Current understanding and future directions. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 11; 104(11):2606-2615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.787
  3. A Program to Provide Clinicians with Feedback on Their Diagnostic Performance in a Learning Health System. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 02; 47(2):120-126.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.741
  4. Patient Perspectives on the Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Symptom Checker: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 01 30; 22(1):e14679.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.712
  5. Pediatric clinician perspectives on communicating diagnostic uncertainty. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Nov 30; 31(9):G107-G112.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.703
  6. Recommendations for using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument to help measure and improve diagnostic safety. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 11 26; 6(4):315-323.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.703
  7. The Path to Diagnostic Excellence Includes Feedback to Calibrate How Clinicians Think. JAMA. 2019 Feb 26; 321(8):737-738.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.667
  8. Evaluating a mobile application for improving clinical laboratory test ordering and diagnosis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 07 01; 25(7):841-847.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.638
  9. Electronic Detection of Delayed Test Result Follow-Up in Patients with Hypothyroidism. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul; 32(7):753-759.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.578
  10. Calibrating how doctors think and seek information to minimise errors in diagnosis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 06; 26(6):436-438.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.564
  11. Communicating Findings of Delayed Diagnostic Evaluation to Primary Care Providers. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jul-Aug; 29(4):469-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.555
  12. Crowdsourcing Diagnosis for Patients With Undiagnosed Illnesses: An Evaluation of CrowdMed. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jan 14; 18(1):e12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.538
  13. "Expert opinion" software for medical diagnosis and treatment-reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr; 174(4):639.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.475
  14. Physicians' diagnostic accuracy, confidence, and resource requests: a vignette study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 25; 173(21):1952-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.464
  15. A Virtual Breakthrough Series Collaborative for Missed Test Results: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 01; 7(10):e2440269.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.246
  16. Diagnostic error in mental health: a review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Sep 19; 33(10):663-672.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.245
  17. Medical Home Implementation and Follow-Up of Cancer-Related Abnormal Test Results in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 03 04; 7(3):e240087.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.236
  18. Managing Interruptions to Improve Diagnostic Decision-Making: Strategies and Recommended Research Agenda. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 05; 38(6):1526-1531.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  19. Electronic Co-design (ECO-design) Workshop for Increasing Clinician Participation in the Design of Health Services Interventions: Participatory Design Approach. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 22; 9(3):e37313.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.214
  20. Cancer Evaluations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study Using National Veterans Affairs Data. Am J Prev Med. 2022 12; 63(6):1026-1030.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  21. Electronic Health Records' Support for Primary Care Physicians' Situation Awareness: A Metanarrative Review. Hum Factors. 2023 Mar; 65(2):237-259.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.195
  22. Advancing Diagnostic Safety Research: Results of a Systematic Research Priority Setting Exercise. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 10; 36(10):2943-2951.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  23. Application of electronic trigger tools to identify targets for improving diagnostic safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 02; 28(2):151-159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  24. Impact of a national QI programme on reducing electronic health record notifications to clinicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 01; 28(1):10-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  25. Patient perspectives on how physicians communicate diagnostic uncertainty: An experimental vignette study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Feb 01; 30(1):2-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  26. Electronic Triggers to Identify Delays in Follow-Up of Mammography: Harnessing the Power of Big Data in Health?Care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 02; 15(2):287-295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  27. Development and Validation of Trigger Algorithms to Identify Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation of Gastroenterological Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan; 16(1):90-98.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.150
  28. Application of Electronic Algorithms to Improve Diagnostic Evaluation for Bladder Cancer. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 03 22; 8(1):279-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  29. Finding Diagnostic Errors in Children Admitted to the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar; 18(3):265-271.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  30. Computerized Triggers of Big Data to Detect?Delays in Follow-up of Chest Imaging?Results. Chest. 2016 09; 150(3):613-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  31. The Burden of Inbox Notifications in Commercial Electronic Health Records. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 176(4):559-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.136
  32. Accuracy of the Safer Dx Instrument to Identify Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 06; 31(6):602-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  33. Online public reactions to frequency of diagnostic errors in US outpatient care. Diagnosis (Berl). 2016 03; 3(1):17-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  34. Diagnostic errors related to acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2016 Apr; 33(4):253-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.133
  35. Electronic Trigger-Based Intervention to Reduce Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation for Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 01; 33(31):3560-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.131
  36. Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record-based Triggers to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Abnormal Lung Imaging Findings. Radiology. 2015 Oct; 277(1):81-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  37. Evaluation of outcomes from a national patient-initiated second-opinion program. Am J Med. 2015 Oct; 128(10):1138.e25-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  38. Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal imaging results and radiologists' recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Apr; 12(4):385-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  39. Exploring new avenues to assess the sharp end of patient safety: an analysis of nationally aggregated peer review data. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec; 23(12):1023-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  40. Developing checklists to prevent diagnostic error in Emergency Room settings. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 09; 1(3):223-231.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  41. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep; 23(9):727-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  42. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25; 173(6):418-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  43. Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul; 21(7):535-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  44. How is diagnostic uncertainty communicated and managed in real world primary care settings? BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 12; 25(1):296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  45. Errors in Diagnosis of Spinal Epidural Abscesses in the Era of Electronic Health Records. Am J Med. 2017 08; 130(8):975-981.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  46. Workarounds and Test Results Follow-up in Electronic Health Record-Based Primary Care. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):543-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  47. Patient-initiated second opinions: systematic review of characteristics and impact on diagnosis, treatment, and satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 May; 89(5):687-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  48. Electronic health record-related safety concerns: a cross-sectional survey. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2014; 34(1):14-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  49. Challenges of making a diagnosis in the outpatient setting: a multi-site survey of primary care physicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Aug; 21(8):641-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.