Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by HARDEEP SINGH and TRABER GIARDINA.
HARDEEP SINGH
Connection Strength
12.232
TRABER GIARDINA
  1. Charting Diagnostic Safety: Exploring Patient-Provider Discordance in Medical Record Documentation. J Gen Intern Med. 2024 Sep 05.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.980
  2. Advancing Diagnostic Equity Through Clinician Engagement, Community Partnerships, and Connected Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 04; 38(5):1293-1295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.873
  3. Creating a Learning Health System for Improving Diagnostic Safety: Pragmatic Insights from US Health Care Organizations. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 11; 37(15):3965-3972.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.837
  4. Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 05 11; 29(6):1091-1100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.834
  5. Use of patient complaints to identify diagnosis-related safety concerns: a mixed-method evaluation. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 12; 30(12):996-1001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.766
  6. Health Care Provider Factors Associated with Patient-Reported Adverse Events and Harm. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 05; 46(5):282-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.715
  7. Learning From Patients' Experiences Related To Diagnostic Errors Is Essential For Progress In Patient Safety. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 11; 37(11):1821-1827.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.653
  8. Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 04 01; 25(4):440-446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.627
  9. Online public reactions to frequency of diagnostic errors in US outpatient care. Diagnosis (Berl). 2016 03; 3(1):17-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.542
  10. Releasing test results directly to patients: A multisite survey of physician perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun; 98(6):788-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.506
  11. The patient portal and abnormal test results: An exploratory study of patient experiences. Patient Exp J. 2015; 2(1):148-154.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.501
  12. Root cause analysis reports help identify common factors in delayed diagnosis and treatment of outpatients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug; 32(8):1368-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  13. A Virtual Breakthrough Series Collaborative for Missed Test Results: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 01; 7(10):e2440269.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.246
  14. Partnership as a Pathway to Diagnostic Excellence: The Challenges and Successes of Implementing the Safer Dx Learning Lab. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 Dec; 50(12):834-841.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  15. Patient generated research priorities to improve diagnostic safety: A systematic prioritization exercise. Patient Educ Couns. 2023 05; 110:107650.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  16. Defining Diagnostic Error: A Scoping Review to Assess the Impact of the National Academies' Report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. J Patient Saf. 2022 12 01; 18(8):770-778.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  17. Technology-Based Closed-Loop Tracking for Improving Communication and Follow-up of Pathology Results. J Patient Saf. 2022 01 01; 18(1):e262-e266.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  18. An Operational Framework to Study Diagnostic Errors in Emergency Departments: Findings From A Consensus Panel. J Patient Saf. 2021 12 01; 17(8):570-575.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  19. Patient and clinician experiences of uncertainty in the diagnostic process: Current understanding and future directions. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 11; 104(11):2606-2615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  20. Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 01; 37(1):137-144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  21. Identifying trigger concepts to screen emergency department visits for diagnostic errors. Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 08 26; 8(3):340-346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  22. Patient Perspectives on the Usefulness of an Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Symptom Checker: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 01 30; 22(1):e14679.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  23. Pediatric clinician perspectives on communicating diagnostic uncertainty. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Nov 30; 31(9):G107-G112.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  24. An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 10 02; 2(10):e1912638.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  25. Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 09; 34(9):1825-1832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  26. Methods for Patient-Centered Interface Design of Test Result Display in Online Portals. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2018 Jun 26; 6(1):15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  27. Patient perspectives on how physicians communicate diagnostic uncertainty: An experimental vignette study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Feb 01; 30(1):2-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.155
  28. Patient portals and health apps: Pitfalls, promises, and what one might learn from the other. Healthc (Amst). 2017 Sep; 5(3):81-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  29. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25; 173(6):418-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.111
  30. Postreferral colonoscopy delays in diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a mixed-methods analysis. Qual Manag Health Care. 2012 Oct-Dec; 21(4):252-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  31. Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb; 21(2):93-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  32. Rethinking resident supervision to improve safety: from hierarchical to interprofessional models. J Hosp Med. 2011 Oct; 6(8):445-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  33. Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan; 21(1):30-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  34. How do GPs communicate the urgent suspected cancer referral pathway to patients? A qualitative study of GP-patient consultations. BJGP Open. 2024 Nov 21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  35. Diagnostic error in mental health: a review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Sep 19; 33(10):663-672.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  36. How is diagnostic uncertainty communicated and managed in real world primary care settings? BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 12; 25(1):296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  37. Electronic Co-design (ECO-design) Workshop for Increasing Clinician Participation in the Design of Health Services Interventions: Participatory Design Approach. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Sep 22; 9(3):e37313.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  38. Test results management and distributed cognition in electronic health record-enabled primary care. Health Informatics J. 2019 12; 25(4):1549-1562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  39. Safety huddles to proactively identify and address electronic health record safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 01; 24(2):261-267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  40. Emergency physicians' views of direct notification of laboratory and radiology results to patients using the Internet: a multisite survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 04; 17(3):e60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  41. Challenges of making a diagnosis in the outpatient setting: a multi-site survey of primary care physicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Aug; 21(8):641-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.