Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by HARDEEP SINGH and DANIEL MURPHY.
Connection Strength
13.948
-
An electronic trigger to detect telemedicine-related diagnostic errors. J Telemed Telecare. 2024 Apr 01; 1357633X241236570.
Score: 0.951
-
Developing electronic clinical quality measures to assess the cancer diagnostic process. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 08 18; 30(9):1526-1531.
Score: 0.911
-
Dashboards for visual display of patient safety data: a systematic review. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Oct; 28(1).
Score: 0.800
-
An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 10 02; 2(10):e1912638.
Score: 0.696
-
Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 09; 34(9):1825-1832.
Score: 0.685
-
Barriers and facilitators impacting reliability of the electronic health record-facilitated total testing process. Int J Med Inform. 2019 07; 127:102-108.
Score: 0.673
-
Application of electronic trigger tools to identify targets for improving diagnostic safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 02; 28(2):151-159.
Score: 0.650
-
Electronic Triggers to Identify Delays in Follow-Up of Mammography: Harnessing the Power of Big Data in Health?Care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 02; 15(2):287-295.
Score: 0.610
-
Development and Validation of Trigger Algorithms to Identify Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation of Gastroenterological Cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jan; 16(1):90-98.
Score: 0.600
-
Application of Electronic Algorithms to Improve Diagnostic Evaluation for Bladder Cancer. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 03 22; 8(1):279-290.
Score: 0.584
-
Electronic Health Records Quantify Previously Existing Phenomenon-Physicians Spend Hours Coordinating Care-Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 08 01; 176(8):1235-6.
Score: 0.559
-
Computerized Triggers of Big Data to Detect?Delays in Follow-up of Chest Imaging?Results. Chest. 2016 09; 150(3):613-20.
Score: 0.550
-
The Burden of Inbox Notifications in Commercial Electronic Health Records. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 176(4):559-60.
Score: 0.546
-
Electronic Trigger-Based Intervention to Reduce Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation for Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 01; 33(31):3560-7.
Score: 0.524
-
Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record-based Triggers to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Abnormal Lung Imaging Findings. Radiology. 2015 Oct; 277(1):81-7.
Score: 0.513
-
Electronic health record-based triggers to detect potential delays in cancer diagnosis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jan; 23(1):8-16.
Score: 0.453
-
Electronic health record-based messages to primary care providers: valuable information or just noise? Arch Intern Med. 2012 Feb 13; 172(3):283-5.
Score: 0.410
-
Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis. Am J Med. 2012 Feb; 125(2):209.e1-7.
Score: 0.409
-
Development and Implementation of a Digital Quality Measure of Emergency Cancer Diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 20; 42(21):2506-2515.
Score: 0.239
-
Medical Home Implementation and Follow-Up of Cancer-Related Abnormal Test Results in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 03 04; 7(3):e240087.
Score: 0.236
-
Cancer Evaluations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study Using National Veterans Affairs Data. Am J Prev Med. 2022 12; 63(6):1026-1030.
Score: 0.212
-
Electronic Health Records' Support for Primary Care Physicians' Situation Awareness: A Metanarrative Review. Hum Factors. 2023 Mar; 65(2):237-259.
Score: 0.195
-
Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 01; 37(1):137-144.
Score: 0.194
-
Application of Human Factors Methods to Understand Missed Follow-up of Abnormal Test Results. Appl Clin Inform. 2020 10; 11(5):692-698.
Score: 0.187
-
Diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting with hematuria: An electronic health record-based study. Urol Oncol. 2018 03; 36(3):88.e19-88.e25.
Score: 0.153
-
Errors in Diagnosis of Spinal Epidural Abscesses in the Era of Electronic Health Records. Am J Med. 2017 08; 130(8):975-981.
Score: 0.146
-
Electronic Detection of Delayed Test Result Follow-Up in Patients with Hypothyroidism. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul; 32(7):753-759.
Score: 0.145
-
Challenges in patient safety improvement research in the era of electronic health records. Healthc (Amst). 2016 Dec; 4(4):285-290.
Score: 0.140
-
Communicating Findings of Delayed Diagnostic Evaluation to Primary Care Providers. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jul-Aug; 29(4):469-73.
Score: 0.139
-
Graphical display of diagnostic test results in electronic health records: a comparison of 8 systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul; 22(4):900-4.
Score: 0.127
-
Communication breakdowns and diagnostic errors: a radiology perspective. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 12; 1(4):253-261.
Score: 0.122
-
Breakdowns in communication of radiological findings: an ethical and medico-legal conundrum. Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 12; 1(4):263-268.
Score: 0.122
-
Resilient actions in the diagnostic process and system performance. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Dec; 22(12):1006-13.
Score: 0.113
-
Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug; 20(4):727-35.
Score: 0.109
-
Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan; 26(1):64-9.
Score: 0.093
-
Translating electronic health record-based patient safety algorithms from research to clinical practice at multiple sites. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Jul; 29(1).
Score: 0.053
-
Variation in high-priority drug-drug interaction alerts across institutions and electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):331-338.
Score: 0.036
-
Workarounds and Test Results Follow-up in Electronic Health Record-Based Primary Care. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):543-59.
Score: 0.035
-
Improving the effectiveness of electronic health record-based referral processes. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Sep 13; 12:107.
Score: 0.027