Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by HARDEEP SINGH and LAURA PETERSEN.
Connection Strength

3.414
  1. Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan; 26(1):64-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.372
  2. Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med. 2010 Mar; 123(3):238-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.358
  3. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28; 169(17):1578-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.348
  4. Prescription errors and outcomes related to inconsistent information transmitted through computerized order entry: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med. 2009 May 25; 169(10):982-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.340
  5. Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr; 104(4):942-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.335
  6. Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr; 23(4):489-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.314
  7. Errors in cancer diagnosis: current understanding and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 01; 25(31):5009-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.305
  8. Communication outcomes of critical imaging results in a computerized notification system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jul-Aug; 14(4):459-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.294
  9. Identifying diagnostic errors in primary care using an electronic screening algorithm. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 12; 167(3):302-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.290
  10. Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan; 21(1):30-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  11. Reducing referral delays in colorectal cancer diagnosis: is it about how you ask? Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct; 19(5):e27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  12. Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Dec 09; 9:49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  13. Missed opportunities to initiate endoscopic evaluation for colorectal cancer diagnosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct; 104(10):2543-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  14. Medical errors involving trainees: a study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22; 167(19):2030-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  15. A quasi-experimental test of an intervention to increase the use of thiazide-based treatment regimens for people with hypertension. Implement Sci. 2007 Feb 13; 2:5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.