Header Logo

Connection

HARDEEP SINGH to Diagnostic Errors

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HARDEEP SINGH has written about Diagnostic Errors.
HARDEEP SINGH
Connection Strength
21.220
Diagnostic Errors
  1. Measure Dx: Implementing pathways to discover and learn from diagnostic errors. Int J Qual Health Care. 2022 Sep 10; 34(3).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.620
  2. Five strategies for clinicians to advance diagnostic excellence. BMJ. 2022 02 16; 376:e068044.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.596
  3. Diagnostic error in hospitals: finding forests not just the big trees. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 12; 29(12):961-964.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.536
  4. Developing Health Care Organizations That Pursue Learning and Exploration of Diagnostic Excellence: An Action Plan. Acad Med. 2020 08; 95(8):1172-1178.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.536
  5. Operational measurement of diagnostic safety: state of the science. Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 02 23; 8(1):51-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.535
  6. Identifying psychiatric diagnostic errors with the Safer Dx Instrument. Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jul 20; 32(6):405-411.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.534
  7. Reducing the Risk of Diagnostic Error in the COVID-19 Era. J Hosp Med. 2020 06; 15(6):363-366.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.529
  8. Measures to Improve Diagnostic Safety in Clinical Practice. J Patient Saf. 2019 12; 15(4):311-316.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.511
  9. Recommendations for using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument to help measure and improve diagnostic safety. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 11 26; 6(4):315-323.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.511
  10. Two Decades Since To Err Is Human: An Assessment Of Progress And Emerging Priorities In Patient Safety. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 11; 37(11):1736-1743.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.474
  11. Payment Innovations To Improve Diagnostic Accuracy And Reduce Diagnostic Error. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 11; 37(11):1828-1835.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.474
  12. Learning From Patients' Experiences Related To Diagnostic Errors Is Essential For Progress In Patient Safety. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 11; 37(11):1821-1827.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.474
  13. Application of electronic trigger tools to identify targets for improving diagnostic safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 02; 28(2):151-159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.472
  14. Beyond Dr. Google: the evidence on consumer-facing digital tools for diagnosis. Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 09 25; 5(3):95-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.471
  15. Diagnostic Error in the Critically III: Defining the Problem and Exploring Next Steps to Advance Intensive Care Unit Safety. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 08; 15(8):903-907.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.466
  16. Electronic health record reviews to measure diagnostic uncertainty in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 06; 24(3):545-551.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.457
  17. Tracking Progress in Improving Diagnosis: A Framework for Defining Undesirable Diagnostic Events. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 07; 33(7):1187-1191.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.450
  18. Using Fault Trees to Advance Understanding of Diagnostic Errors. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 11; 43(11):598-605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.440
  19. Finding Diagnostic Errors in Children Admitted to the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar; 18(3):265-271.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.423
  20. The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jun; 26(6):484-494.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.407
  21. Accuracy of the Safer Dx Instrument to Identify Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 06; 31(6):602-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.394
  22. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care--The Next Imperative for Patient Safety. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24; 373(26):2493-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.386
  23. Diagnostic errors related to acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2016 Apr; 33(4):253-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.385
  24. Using voluntary reports from physicians to learn from diagnostic errors in emergency medicine. Emerg Med J. 2016 Apr; 33(4):245-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.385
  25. Setting the record straight on measuring diagnostic errors. Reply to: 'Bad assumptions on primary care diagnostic errors' by Dr Richard Young. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May; 24(5):345-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.369
  26. Advancing the science of measurement of diagnostic errors in healthcare: the Safer Dx framework. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb; 24(2):103-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.365
  27. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep; 23(9):727-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.346
  28. Origins of diagnostic error--reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 11; 173(20):1926-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.336
  29. Diagnostic errors: moving beyond 'no respect' and getting ready for prime time. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct; 22(10):789-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.333
  30. Advancing the research agenda for diagnostic error reduction. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct; 22 Suppl 2:ii52-ii57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.330
  31. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25; 173(6):418-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.322
  32. Cognitive interventions to reduce diagnostic error: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jul; 21(7):535-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.302
  33. System-related interventions to reduce diagnostic errors: a narrative review. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb; 21(2):160-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.294
  34. Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb; 21(2):93-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.291
  35. Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan; 21(1):30-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.289
  36. Reducing diagnostic error through medical home-based primary care reform. JAMA. 2010 Jul 28; 304(4):463-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.268
  37. Errors of diagnosis in pediatric practice: a multisite survey. Pediatrics. 2010 Jul; 126(1):70-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.266
  38. Underdiagnosis of Lynch syndrome involves more than family history criteria. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jun; 8(6):523-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.261
  39. Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med. 2010 Mar; 123(3):238-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.260
  40. Missed and delayed diagnosis of dementia in primary care: prevalence and contributing factors. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009 Oct-Dec; 23(4):306-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.253
  41. Diagnostic errors in ambulatory care: dimensions and preventive strategies. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Sep; 14 Suppl 1:57-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.250
  42. Missed opportunities to initiate endoscopic evaluation for colorectal cancer diagnosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct; 104(10):2543-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  43. Reducing diagnostic errors through effective communication: harnessing the power of information technology. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Apr; 23(4):489-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  44. Errors in cancer diagnosis: current understanding and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 01; 25(31):5009-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  45. Identifying diagnostic errors in primary care using an electronic screening algorithm. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 12; 167(3):302-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  46. Characteristics and contributing factors of diagnostic error in surgery: analysis of closed medico-legal cases and complaints in Canada. Can J Surg. 2024 Jan-Feb; 67(1):E58-E65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  47. The PRIDx framework to engage payers in reducing diagnostic errors in healthcare. Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Feb 01; 11(1):17-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  48. Types of diagnostic errors reported by paediatric emergency providers in a global paediatric emergency care research network. BMJ Open Qual. 2023 03; 12(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  49. Patient generated research priorities to improve diagnostic safety: A systematic prioritization exercise. Patient Educ Couns. 2023 05; 110:107650.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  50. Managing Interruptions to Improve Diagnostic Decision-Making: Strategies and Recommended Research Agenda. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 05; 38(6):1526-1531.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  51. Developing the Safer Dx Checklist of Ten Safety Recommendations for Health Care Organizations to Address Diagnostic Errors. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2022 Nov; 48(11):581-590.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  52. Creating a Learning Health System for Improving Diagnostic Safety: Pragmatic Insights from US Health Care Organizations. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 11; 37(15):3965-3972.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  53. Characteristics of Disease-Specific and Generic Diagnostic Pitfalls: A Qualitative Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 01 04; 5(1):e2144531.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  54. An Operational Framework to Study Diagnostic Errors in Emergency Departments: Findings From A Consensus Panel. J Patient Saf. 2021 12 01; 17(8):570-575.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  55. Validation of an electronic trigger to measure missed diagnosis of stroke in emergency departments. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 09 18; 28(10):2202-2211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  56. Identifying trigger concepts to screen emergency department visits for diagnostic errors. Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 08 26; 8(3):340-346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  57. Frequency, Risk Factors, Causes, and Consequences of Diagnostic Errors in Critically Ill Medical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2019 11; 47(11):e902-e910.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  58. Isolating red flags to enhance diagnosis (I-RED): An experimental vignette study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Oct 31; 31(8):G97-G102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  59. Accuracy of Anxiety Disorder Not Otherwise Specified Diagnosis in Older Veterans. J Psychiatr Pract. 2019 09; 25(5):358-364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  60. Diagnostic errors in the neonatal intensive care unit: State of the science and new directions. Semin Perinatol. 2019 12; 43(8):151175.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  61. Teaching novice clinicians how to reduce diagnostic waste and errors by applying the Toyota Production System. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 06 26; 6(2):179-185.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  62. The design and conduct of Project RedDE: A cluster-randomized trial to reduce diagnostic errors in pediatric primary care. Clin Trials. 2019 04; 16(2):154-164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  63. Diagnostic Decision-Making in the Emergency Department. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2018 12; 65(6):1097-1105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  64. Mind the overlap: how system problems contribute to cognitive failure and diagnostic errors. Diagnosis (Berl). 2018 09 25; 5(3):151-156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  65. Focused Ethnography of Diagnosis in Academic Medical Centers. J Hosp Med. 2018 10 01; 13(10):668-672.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  66. An electronic trigger based on care escalation to identify preventable adverse events in hospitalised patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 03; 27(3):241-246.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  67. Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care Pediatrics: Project RedDE. Acad Pediatr. 2018 03; 18(2):220-227.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  68. Errors in Diagnosis of Spinal Epidural Abscesses in the Era of Electronic Health Records. Am J Med. 2017 08; 130(8):975-981.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  69. Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records. Implement Sci. 2015 Jul 29; 10:105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  70. Physicians' diagnostic accuracy, confidence, and resource requests: a vignette study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 25; 173(21):1952-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  71. Electronic health record-based triggers to detect potential delays in cancer diagnosis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jan; 23(1):8-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  72. Prevalence and Characteristics of Diagnostic Error in Pediatric Critical Care: A Multicenter Study. Crit Care Med. 2023 11 01; 51(11):1492-1501.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  73. Defining Diagnostic Error: A Scoping Review to Assess the Impact of the National Academies' Report Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. J Patient Saf. 2022 12 01; 18(8):770-778.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  74. Frequency of diagnostic errors in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study. J Perinatol. 2022 10; 42(10):1312-1318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  75. Harnessing Event Report Data to Identify Diagnostic Error During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2022 02; 48(2):71-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  76. Improving diagnostic performance through feedback: the Diagnosis Learning Cycle. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 12; 30(12):1002-1009.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  77. Diagnostic Errors in Pediatric Critical Care: A Systematic Review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 08 01; 22(8):701-712.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  78. Incidence, origins and avoidable harm of missed opportunities in diagnosis: longitudinal patient record review in 21 English general practices. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 12; 30(12):977-985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  79. Factors Associated With Diagnostic Error on Admission to a PICU: A Pilot Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 05; 21(5):e311-e315.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  80. The authors reply. Crit Care Med. 2020 05; 48(5):e434-e435.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.