HARDEEP SINGH to Qualitative Research
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HARDEEP SINGH has written about Qualitative Research.
Connection Strength
1.321
-
Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 07; 50(7):480-491.
Score: 0.165
-
Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 01; 37(1):137-144.
Score: 0.135
-
Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 06 01; 3(6):e206752.
Score: 0.127
-
Pediatric clinician perspectives on communicating diagnostic uncertainty. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Nov 30; 31(9):G107-G112.
Score: 0.122
-
An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 10 02; 2(10):e1912638.
Score: 0.121
-
Challenges in patient safety improvement research in the era of electronic health records. Healthc (Amst). 2016 Dec; 4(4):285-290.
Score: 0.097
-
Resilient actions in the diagnostic process and system performance. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Dec; 22(12):1006-13.
Score: 0.078
-
Postreferral colonoscopy delays in diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a mixed-methods analysis. Qual Manag Health Care. 2012 Oct-Dec; 21(4):252-61.
Score: 0.074
-
Towards successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis. Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 27; 6:84.
Score: 0.069
-
Using Video Ethnography and Stimulated Recall Interviews to Describe the Diagnostic Process in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2025 Nov; 32(11):1189-1196.
Score: 0.046
-
Whose Job is it Anyway? A Qualitative Study of Providers' Perspectives on Diagnosing Anxiety Disorders in Integrated Health Settings. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul; 52(3):391-407.
Score: 0.043
-
How is diagnostic uncertainty communicated and managed in real world primary care settings? BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 12; 25(1):296.
Score: 0.042
-
Characteristics of Disease-Specific and Generic Diagnostic Pitfalls: A Qualitative Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 01 04; 5(1):e2144531.
Score: 0.035
-
Improving diagnostic performance through feedback: the Diagnosis Learning Cycle. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 12; 30(12):1002-1009.
Score: 0.034
-
Patient and Physician Perspectives of Deprescribing Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Older Adults with a History of Falls: a Qualitative Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 10; 36(10):3015-3022.
Score: 0.033
-
Influence of doctor-patient conversations on behaviours of patients presenting to primary care with new or persistent symptoms: a video observation study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 03; 29(3):198-208.
Score: 0.030
-
Essential activities for electronic health record safety: A qualitative study. Health Informatics J. 2020 12; 26(4):3140-3151.
Score: 0.029
-
Analysis of Prescribers' Notes in Electronic Prescriptions in Ambulatory Practice. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 176(4):463-70.
Score: 0.024
-
Primary care and communication in shared cancer care: a qualitative study. Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr; 17(4):259-65.
Score: 0.017