HARDEEP SINGH to Qualitative Research
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HARDEEP SINGH has written about Qualitative Research.
Connection Strength
1.618
-
Exploring Patient and Caregiver Work and Continuity of Care During Hospital-to-Home Transitions of Care in the Canadian Context. Health Expect. 2026 06; 29(3):e70727.
Score: 0.183
-
Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 07; 50(7):480-491.
Score: 0.157
-
Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 01; 37(1):137-144.
Score: 0.129
-
Exploring the perspectives of outpatient rehabilitation clinicians on the challenges with monitoring patient health, function and activity in the community. Disabil Rehabil. 2022 06; 44(12):2858-2867.
Score: 0.125
-
Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 06 01; 3(6):e206752.
Score: 0.121
-
Pediatric clinician perspectives on communicating diagnostic uncertainty. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Nov 30; 31(9):G107-G112.
Score: 0.117
-
An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 10 02; 2(10):e1912638.
Score: 0.115
-
Challenges in patient safety improvement research in the era of electronic health records. Healthc (Amst). 2016 Dec; 4(4):285-290.
Score: 0.093
-
Resilient actions in the diagnostic process and system performance. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Dec; 22(12):1006-13.
Score: 0.075
-
Postreferral colonoscopy delays in diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a mixed-methods analysis. Qual Manag Health Care. 2012 Oct-Dec; 21(4):252-61.
Score: 0.071
-
Towards successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis. Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 27; 6:84.
Score: 0.065
-
A qualitative exploration of patient perspectives regarding patient education during their colorectal surgical experience. Colorectal Dis. 2026 May; 28(5):e70485.
Score: 0.046
-
Using Video Ethnography and Stimulated Recall Interviews to Describe the Diagnostic Process in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2025 11; 32(11):1189-1196.
Score: 0.044
-
Whose Job is it Anyway? A Qualitative Study of Providers' Perspectives on Diagnosing Anxiety Disorders in Integrated Health Settings. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul; 52(3):391-407.
Score: 0.041
-
How is diagnostic uncertainty communicated and managed in real world primary care settings? BMC Prim Care. 2024 08 12; 25(1):296.
Score: 0.040
-
The experiences of people with incomplete spinal cord injury or disease during intensive balance training and the impact of the program: A qualitative study. Spinal Cord. 2022 12; 60(12):1062-1068.
Score: 0.035
-
Characteristics of Disease-Specific and Generic Diagnostic Pitfalls: A Qualitative Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 01 04; 5(1):e2144531.
Score: 0.034
-
Improving diagnostic performance through feedback: the Diagnosis Learning Cycle. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 12; 30(12):1002-1009.
Score: 0.033
-
Influence of doctor-patient conversations on behaviours of patients presenting to primary care with new or persistent symptoms: a video observation study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 03; 29(3):198-208.
Score: 0.028
-
Essential activities for electronic health record safety: A qualitative study. Health Informatics J. 2020 12; 26(4):3140-3151.
Score: 0.028
-
Analysis of Prescribers' Notes in Electronic Prescriptions in Ambulatory Practice. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 176(4):463-70.
Score: 0.023
-
Primary care and communication in shared cancer care: a qualitative study. Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr; 17(4):259-65.
Score: 0.016