Header Logo

Connection

HARDEEP SINGH to Retrospective Studies

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HARDEEP SINGH has written about Retrospective Studies.
HARDEEP SINGH
Connection Strength
1.353
Retrospective Studies
  1. Implementation of Electronic Triggers to Identify Diagnostic Errors in Emergency Departments. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 01; 185(2):143-151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  2. Epidemiology of diagnostic errors in pediatric emergency departments using electronic triggers. Acad Emerg Med. 2025 03; 32(3):226-245.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  3. Prevalence and Outcomes of Emergency Presentations of Colorectal Cancer in Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jan; 70(1):177-190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  4. Medical Home Implementation and Follow-Up of Cancer-Related Abnormal Test Results in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 03 04; 7(3):e240087.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  5. Characteristics and contributing factors of diagnostic error in surgery: analysis of closed medico-legal cases and complaints in Canada. Can J Surg. 2024 Jan-Feb; 67(1):E58-E65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  6. Emergency Presentations Predict Worse Outcomes Among Patients with Pancreatic Cancer. Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Feb; 69(2):603-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  7. Missed Opportunities to Promptly Diagnose and Treat Adrenal Tumors. J Surg Res. 2022 08; 276:174-181.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  8. Validation of an electronic trigger to measure missed diagnosis of stroke in emergency departments. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 09 18; 28(10):2202-2211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  9. Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 06 01; 3(6):e206752.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  10. Understanding diagnostic safety in emergency medicine: A case-by-case review of closed ED malpractice claims. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2018 Jul; 38(1):48-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  11. Electronic health record reviews to measure diagnostic uncertainty in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 06; 24(3):545-551.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  12. Diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting with hematuria: An electronic health record-based study. Urol Oncol. 2018 03; 36(3):88.e19-88.e25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  13. Accuracy of the Safer Dx Instrument to Identify Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 06; 31(6):602-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  14. Diagnostic errors related to acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2016 Apr; 33(4):253-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  15. Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record-based Triggers to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Abnormal Lung Imaging Findings. Radiology. 2015 Oct; 277(1):81-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  16. An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec; 21(6):1053-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  17. Root cause analysis reports help identify common factors in delayed diagnosis and treatment of outpatients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug; 32(8):1368-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  18. Electronic health record-based triggers to detect potential delays in cancer diagnosis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jan; 23(1):8-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  19. Effectiveness of an electronic health record-based intervention to improve follow-up of abnormal pathology results: a retrospective record analysis. Med Care. 2012 Oct; 50(10):898-904.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  20. Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb; 21(2):93-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  21. Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan; 26(1):64-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  22. Underdiagnosis of Lynch syndrome involves more than family history criteria. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jun; 8(6):523-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  23. Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med. 2010 Mar; 123(3):238-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  24. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28; 169(17):1578-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  25. Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr; 104(4):942-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  26. Patterns of antihypertensive therapy among patients with diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep; 20(9):842-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  27. Prescribing patterns of diuretics in multi-drug antihypertensive regimens. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2005 Feb; 7(2):81-7; quiz 88-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  28. Diagnostic Uncertainty Among Critically Ill Children Admitted to the PICU: A Multicenter Study. Crit Care Med. 2025 Feb 01; 53(2):e294-e307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  29. Diagnostic Discordance, Uncertainty, and Treatment Ambiguity in Community-Acquired Pneumonia : A National Cohort Study of 115 U.S. Veterans Affairs Hospitals. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Sep; 177(9):1179-1189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  30. Interfacility Referral Communication for PICU Transfer. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun 01; 25(6):499-511.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  31. Prevalence and Characteristics of Diagnostic Error in Pediatric Critical Care: A Multicenter Study. Crit Care Med. 2023 11 01; 51(11):1492-1501.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  32. Impact of subspecialty consultations on diagnosis in the pediatric intensive care unit. Diagnosis (Berl). 2022 08 01; 9(3):379-384.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  33. Frequency of diagnostic errors in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study. J Perinatol. 2022 10; 42(10):1312-1318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  34. Diagnosis Documentation of Critically Ill Children at Admission to a PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 02 01; 23(2):99-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  35. Potentially Harmful Medication Dispenses After a Fall or Hip Fracture: A Mixed Methods Study of a Commonly Used Quality Measure. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2022 04; 48(4):222-232.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  36. Characteristics of Disease-Specific and Generic Diagnostic Pitfalls: A Qualitative Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 01 04; 5(1):e2144531.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  37. Laboratory monitoring to reduce adverse drug-related events: a mixed methods study. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jan; 28(1):16-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  38. Identifying opportunities for timely diagnosis of bladder and renal cancer via abnormal blood tests: a longitudinal linked data study. Br J Gen Pract. 2022 01; 72(714):e19-e25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  39. Testing Practices, Interpretation, and Diagnostic Evaluation of Iron Deficiency Anemia by US Primary Care Physicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 10 01; 4(10):e2127827.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  40. Diagnostic Errors in Pediatric Critical Care: A Systematic Review. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 08 01; 22(8):701-712.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  41. Incidence, origins and avoidable harm of missed opportunities in diagnosis: longitudinal patient record review in 21 English general practices. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 12; 30(12):977-985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  42. Complications and Failure to Rescue After Inpatient Pediatric Surgery. Ann Surg. 2022 10 01; 276(4):e239-e246.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  43. Variation in surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism in the US Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system: A 15-year observational study. Surgery. 2020 11; 168(5):838-844.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  44. Factors Associated With Delay of Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 08; 19(8):1679-1687.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  45. Factors Associated With Diagnostic Error on Admission to a PICU: A Pilot Study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 05; 21(5):e311-e315.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  46. The authors reply. Crit Care Med. 2020 05; 48(5):e434-e435.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  47. Factors Associated With Potentially Missed Diagnosis of Appendicitis in the Emergency Department. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 03 02; 3(3):e200612.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  48. Frequency, Risk Factors, Causes, and Consequences of Diagnostic Errors in Critically Ill Medical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2019 11; 47(11):e902-e910.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  49. Follow-up of Abnormal Estimated GFR Results Within a Large Integrated Health Care Delivery System: A Mixed-Methods Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 11; 74(5):589-600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  50. Missed Diagnosis of New-Onset Systolic Heart Failure at First Presentation in Children with No Known Heart Disease. J Pediatr. 2019 05; 208:258-264.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  51. External benchmarking of trauma services in New South Wales: Risk-adjusted mortality after moderate to severe injury from 2012 to 2016. Injury. 2019 Jan; 50(1):178-185.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  52. Errors in Diagnosis of Spinal Epidural Abscesses in the Era of Electronic Health Records. Am J Med. 2017 08; 130(8):975-981.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  53. Safety huddles to proactively identify and address electronic health record safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 01; 24(2):261-267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  54. Analysis of Prescribers' Notes in Electronic Prescriptions in Ambulatory Practice. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 176(4):463-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  55. Missed diagnostic opportunities and English general practice: a study to determine their incidence, confounding and contributing factors and potential impact on patients through retrospective review of electronic medical records. Implement Sci. 2015 Jul 29; 10:105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.