HARDEEP SINGH to Referral and Consultation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HARDEEP SINGH has written about Referral and Consultation.
Connection Strength
2.808
-
Implementation Science Workshop: Implementation of an Electronic Referral System in a Large Academic Medical Center. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Mar; 31(3):343-52.
Score: 0.373
-
Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal imaging results and radiologists' recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Apr; 12(4):385-9.
Score: 0.344
-
Postreferral colonoscopy delays in diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a mixed-methods analysis. Qual Manag Health Care. 2012 Oct-Dec; 21(4):252-61.
Score: 0.294
-
Towards successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis. Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 27; 6:84.
Score: 0.271
-
Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan; 26(1):64-9.
Score: 0.255
-
Reducing referral delays in colorectal cancer diagnosis: is it about how you ask? Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct; 19(5):e27.
Score: 0.251
-
Interfacility Referral Communication for PICU Transfer. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun 01; 25(6):499-511.
Score: 0.163
-
Updates to referring clinicians regarding critically ill children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit: a state-wide survey. Diagnosis (Berl). 2020 05 26; 7(2):123-128.
Score: 0.125
-
Associations between general practice characteristics with use of urgent referrals for suspected cancer and endoscopies: a cross-sectional ecological study. Fam Pract. 2019 10 08; 36(5):573-580.
Score: 0.120
-
Associations between diagnostic activity and measures of patient experience in primary care: a cross-sectional ecological study of English general practices. Br J Gen Pract. 2018 01; 68(666):e9-e17.
Score: 0.106
-
Diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting with hematuria: An electronic health record-based study. Urol Oncol. 2018 03; 36(3):88.e19-88.e25.
Score: 0.105
-
Evaluation of outcomes from a national patient-initiated second-opinion program. Am J Med. 2015 Oct; 128(10):1138.e25-33.
Score: 0.088
-
Patient-initiated second opinions: systematic review of characteristics and impact on diagnosis, treatment, and satisfaction. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 May; 89(5):687-96.
Score: 0.082
-
Physicians' diagnostic accuracy, confidence, and resource requests: a vignette study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 25; 173(21):1952-8.
Score: 0.080
-
Agreement between patient's description of abdominal symptoms of possible upper gastrointestinal cancer and general practitioner consultation notes: a qualitative analysis of video-recorded UK primary care consultation data. BMJ Open. 2023 01 05; 13(1):e058766.
Score: 0.037
-
Impact of subspecialty consultations on diagnosis in the pediatric intensive care unit. Diagnosis (Berl). 2022 08 01; 9(3):379-384.
Score: 0.036
-
Referral communication for pediatric intensive care unit admission and the diagnosis of critically ill children: A pilot ethnography. J Crit Care. 2021 06; 63:246-249.
Score: 0.032
-
Quality of the diagnostic process in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of bladder or kidney cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019 10 03; 9(10):e029143.
Score: 0.030
-
Challenges of making a diagnosis in the outpatient setting: a multi-site survey of primary care physicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Aug; 21(8):641-8.
Score: 0.018