Header Logo

Connection

HARDEEP SINGH to United States

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HARDEEP SINGH has written about United States.
HARDEEP SINGH
Connection Strength
2.867
United States
  1. Digital quality measure of potentially avoidable emergency presentations among patients with colorectal cancer. BMJ Qual Saf. 2026 May 18; 35(6):380-392.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  2. Aligning Health Policy With Climate Action: Evidence-Based Interventions To Decarbonize Care, Improve Climate Resilience. Health Aff (Millwood). 2026 May; 45(5):498-506.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  3. A digital quality measure for emergency presentation of pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer. 2026 Apr; 134(8):1209-1217.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  4. Frequent Missed Opportunities for Earlier Diagnosis of Advanced-Stage Colorectal or Lung Cancer. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 09 01; 185(9):1102-1108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  5. Revisions to the Safety Assurance Factors for Electronic Health Record Resilience (SAFER) Guides to update national recommendations for safe use of electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 04 01; 32(4):755-760.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  6. Implementation of Electronic Triggers to Identify Diagnostic Errors in Emergency Departments. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 02 01; 185(2):143-151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  7. Prevalence and Outcomes of Emergency Presentations of Colorectal Cancer in Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jan; 70(1):177-190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  8. A Virtual Breakthrough Series Collaborative for Missed Test Results: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 10 01; 7(10):e2440269.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  9. Hospital commitments to address diagnostic errors: An assessment of 95 US hospitals. J Hosp Med. 2025 Feb; 20(2):120-134.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  10. Development and Implementation of a Digital Quality Measure of Emergency Cancer Diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2024 07 20; 42(21):2506-2515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  11. An electronic trigger to detect telemedicine-related diagnostic errors. J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Aug; 31(7):1050-1055.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  12. Adherence to National Guidelines for Timeliness of Test Results Communication to Patients in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 04 01; 5(4):e228568.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  13. Guidelines for US Hospitals and Clinicians on Assessment of Electronic Health Record Safety Using SAFER Guides. JAMA. 2022 Feb 22; 327(8):719-720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  14. Policies to Promote Shared Responsibility for Safer Electronic Health Records. JAMA. 2021 Oct 19; 326(15):1477-1478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  15. Dashboards for visual display of patient safety data: a systematic review. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Oct; 28(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  16. A Roadmap to Advance Patient Safety in Ambulatory Care. JAMA. 2020 12 22; 324(24):2481-2482.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  17. Identifying psychiatric diagnostic errors with the Safer Dx Instrument. Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jul 20; 32(6):405-411.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  18. COVID-19 and the Need for a National Health Information Technology Infrastructure. JAMA. 2020 06 16; 323(23):2373-2374.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  19. Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 06 01; 3(6):e206752.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  20. Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 09; 34(9):1825-1832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  21. Payment Innovations To Improve Diagnostic Accuracy And Reduce Diagnostic Error. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 11; 37(11):1828-1835.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  22. Evaluating a mobile application for improving clinical laboratory test ordering and diagnosis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 07 01; 25(7):841-847.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  23. Adherence to recommended electronic health record safety practices across eight health care organizations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 07 01; 25(7):913-918.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  24. Using Fault Trees to Advance Understanding of Diagnostic Errors. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 11; 43(11):598-605.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  25. Improving the safety of health information technology requires shared responsibility: It is time we all step up. Healthc (Amst). 2018 Mar; 6(1):7-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  26. Computerized Triggers of Big Data to Detect?Delays in Follow-up of Chest Imaging?Results. Chest. 2016 09; 150(3):613-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  27. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care--The Next Imperative for Patient Safety. N Engl J Med. 2015 Dec 24; 373(26):2493-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  28. Diagnostic errors related to acute abdominal pain in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2016 Apr; 33(4):253-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  29. Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: The Health IT Safety Framework. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr; 25(4):226-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  30. Releasing test results directly to patients: A multisite survey of physician perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun; 98(6):788-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  31. Electronic alerts and clinician turnover: the influence of user acceptance. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Nov; 20(11 Spec No. 17):SP520-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  32. Patient safety goals for the proposed Federal Health Information Technology Safety Center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar; 22(2):472-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  33. Exploring new avenues to assess the sharp end of patient safety: an analysis of nationally aggregated peer review data. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Dec; 23(12):1023-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  34. An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec; 21(6):1053-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  35. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep; 23(9):727-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  36. Physicians' diagnostic accuracy, confidence, and resource requests: a vignette study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 25; 173(21):1952-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  37. Diagnostic errors: moving beyond 'no respect' and getting ready for prime time. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct; 22(10):789-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  38. Root cause analysis reports help identify common factors in delayed diagnosis and treatment of outpatients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug; 32(8):1368-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  39. Information overload and missed test results in electronic health record-based settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22; 173(8):702-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  40. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25; 173(6):418-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  41. Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug; 20(4):727-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  42. Electronic health records and national patient-safety goals. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 08; 367(19):1854-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  43. Effectiveness of an electronic health record-based intervention to improve follow-up of abnormal pathology results: a retrospective record analysis. Med Care. 2012 Oct; 50(10):898-904.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  44. Postreferral colonoscopy delays in diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a mixed-methods analysis. Qual Manag Health Care. 2012 Oct-Dec; 21(4):252-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  45. Impact of resident duty hour limits on safety in the intensive care unit: a national survey of pediatric and neonatal intensivists. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Sep; 13(5):578-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  46. Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis. Am J Med. 2012 Feb; 125(2):209.e1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  47. Creating an oversight infrastructure for electronic health record-related patient safety hazards. J Patient Saf. 2011 Dec; 7(4):169-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  48. Should patients get direct access to their laboratory test results? An answer with many questions. JAMA. 2011 Dec 14; 306(22):2502-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  49. Legal, ethical, and financial dilemmas in electronic health record adoption and use. Pediatrics. 2011 Apr; 127(4):e1042-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  50. Electronic health records to coordinate decision making for complex patients: what can we learn from wiki? Med Decis Making. 2010 Nov-Dec; 30(6):722-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  51. Reducing diagnostic error through medical home-based primary care reform. JAMA. 2010 Jul 28; 304(4):463-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  52. Errors of diagnosis in pediatric practice: a multisite survey. Pediatrics. 2010 Jul; 126(1):70-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  53. Ten strategies to improve management of abnormal test result alerts in the electronic health record. J Patient Saf. 2010 Jun; 6(2):121-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  54. Eight recommendations for policies for communicating abnormal test results. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2010 May; 36(5):226-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  55. Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med. 2010 Mar; 123(3):238-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  56. Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Dec 09; 9:49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  57. Eight rights of safe electronic health record use. JAMA. 2009 Sep 09; 302(10):1111-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  58. Medical errors involving trainees: a study of closed malpractice claims from 5 insurers. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Oct 22; 167(19):2030-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  59. Strategies to meaningfully reduce healthcare sector emissions in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep practice: an official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2026 06 01; 23(6):837-860.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  60. Patterns of antihypertensive therapy among patients with diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep; 20(9):842-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  61. Prescribing patterns of diuretics in multi-drug antihypertensive regimens. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2005 Feb; 7(2):81-7; quiz 88-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  62. Application of a digital quality measure for cancer diagnosis in Epic Cosmos. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 01 01; 32(1):227-229.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  63. CDC's Core Elements to promote diagnostic excellence. Diagnosis (Berl). 2025 05 01; 12(2):197-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  64. Whose Job is it Anyway? A Qualitative Study of Providers' Perspectives on Diagnosing Anxiety Disorders in Integrated Health Settings. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul; 52(3):391-407.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  65. Diagnostic Discordance, Uncertainty, and Treatment Ambiguity in Community-Acquired Pneumonia : A National Cohort Study of 115 U.S. Veterans Affairs Hospitals. Ann Intern Med. 2024 09; 177(9):1179-1189.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  66. Quality of care for hypertension and diabetes in federal- versus commercial-managed care organizations. Am J Med Qual. 2004 Jan-Feb; 19(1):19-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  67. The Impact of Race on Pancreatic Cancer Treatment and Survival in the Nationwide Veterans Affairs Healthcare System. Pancreas. 2024 01 01; 53(1):e27-e33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  68. Cancer Evaluations During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study Using National Veterans Affairs Data. Am J Prev Med. 2022 12; 63(6):1026-1030.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  69. Testing Practices, Interpretation, and Diagnostic Evaluation of Iron Deficiency Anemia by US Primary Care Physicians. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 10 01; 4(10):e2127827.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  70. Variation in surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism in the US Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system: A 15-year observational study. Surgery. 2020 11; 168(5):838-844.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  71. Follow-up of Abnormal Estimated GFR Results Within a Large Integrated Health Care Delivery System: A Mixed-Methods Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 11; 74(5):589-600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  72. Errors in Diagnosis of Spinal Epidural Abscesses in the Era of Electronic Health Records. Am J Med. 2017 08; 130(8):975-981.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  73. Variation in high-priority drug-drug interaction alerts across institutions and electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):331-338.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  74. Safety huddles to proactively identify and address electronic health record safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 01; 24(2):261-267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  75. Evaluation of outcomes from a national patient-initiated second-opinion program. Am J Med. 2015 Oct; 128(10):1138.e25-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  76. Development and field testing of a self-assessment guide for computer-based provider order entry. J Healthc Manag. 2014 Sep-Oct; 59(5):338-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  77. Electronic health record-related safety concerns: a cross-sectional survey. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2014; 34(1):14-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  78. Primary care and communication in shared cancer care: a qualitative study. Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr; 17(4):259-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.