Header Logo

Connection

HARDEEP SINGH to Colorectal Neoplasms

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HARDEEP SINGH has written about Colorectal Neoplasms.
HARDEEP SINGH
Connection Strength
4.818
Colorectal Neoplasms
  1. Digital quality measure of potentially avoidable emergency presentations among patients with colorectal cancer. BMJ Qual Saf. 2026 May 18; 35(6):380-392.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.621
  2. Frequent Missed Opportunities for Earlier Diagnosis of Advanced-Stage Colorectal or Lung Cancer. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Sep 01; 185(9):1102-1108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.591
  3. Prevalence and Outcomes of Emergency Presentations of Colorectal Cancer in Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Jan; 70(1):177-190.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.563
  4. A Virtual Breakthrough Series Collaborative for Missed Test Results: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 10 01; 7(10):e2440269.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.555
  5. Medical Home Implementation and Follow-Up of Cancer-Related Abnormal Test Results in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 03 04; 7(3):e240087.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.533
  6. Electronic Trigger-Based Intervention to Reduce Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation for Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 01; 33(31):3560-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.295
  7. Electronic health record-based triggers to detect potential delays in cancer diagnosis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jan; 23(1):8-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.255
  8. Postreferral colonoscopy delays in diagnosis of colorectal cancer: a mixed-methods analysis. Qual Manag Health Care. 2012 Oct-Dec; 21(4):252-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.242
  9. Reducing referral delays in colorectal cancer diagnosis: is it about how you ask? Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct; 19(5):e27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.206
  10. Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Dec 09; 9:49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  11. Missed opportunities to initiate endoscopic evaluation for colorectal cancer diagnosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct; 104(10):2543-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  12. Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr; 104(4):942-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  13. Development and Implementation of a Digital Quality Measure of Emergency Cancer Diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2024 07 20; 42(21):2506-2515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  14. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Sep; 23(9):727-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  15. Resilient actions in the diagnostic process and system performance. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Dec; 22(12):1006-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  16. Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan; 21(1):30-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  17. Primary care and communication in shared cancer care: a qualitative study. Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr; 17(4):259-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.