HARDEEP SINGH to Communication
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HARDEEP SINGH has written about Communication.
Connection Strength
6.534
-
Patient and clinician experiences of uncertainty in the diagnostic process: Current understanding and future directions. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 11; 104(11):2606-2615.
Score: 0.523
-
A Sociotechnical Framework for Safety-Related Electronic Health Record Research Reporting: The SAFER Reporting Framework. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S92-S100.
Score: 0.484
-
Prioritizing Patient Safety Efforts in Office Practice Settings. J Patient Saf. 2019 12; 15(4):e98-e101.
Score: 0.468
-
Pediatric clinician perspectives on communicating diagnostic uncertainty. Int J Qual Health Care. 2019 Nov 30; 31(9):G107-G112.
Score: 0.468
-
Learning From Patients' Experiences Related To Diagnostic Errors Is Essential For Progress In Patient Safety. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 11; 37(11):1821-1827.
Score: 0.434
-
Patient perspectives on how physicians communicate diagnostic uncertainty: An experimental vignette study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Feb 01; 30(1):2-8.
Score: 0.412
-
The Burden of Inbox Notifications in Commercial Electronic Health Records. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 176(4):559-60.
Score: 0.363
-
Lack of timely follow-up of abnormal imaging results and radiologists' recommendations. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Apr; 12(4):385-9.
Score: 0.333
-
Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med. 2010 Mar; 123(3):238-44.
Score: 0.238
-
Communication outcomes of critical imaging results in a computerized notification system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Jul-Aug; 14(4):459-66.
Score: 0.195
-
Communicating blood test results in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Apr; 75(753):e222-e231.
Score: 0.169
-
How is diagnostic uncertainty communicated and managed in real world primary care settings? BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 12; 25(1):296.
Score: 0.162
-
Frontline Providers' and Patients' Perspectives on Improving Diagnostic Safety in the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 07; 50(7):480-491.
Score: 0.157
-
Applying requisite imagination to safeguard electronic health record transitions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 04 13; 29(5):1014-1018.
Score: 0.138
-
Adherence to National Guidelines for Timeliness of Test Results Communication to Patients in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 04 01; 5(4):e228568.
Score: 0.137
-
Technology-Based Closed-Loop Tracking for Improving Communication and Follow-up of Pathology Results. J Patient Saf. 2022 01 01; 18(1):e262-e266.
Score: 0.135
-
Understanding diagnostic processes in emergency departments: a mixed methods case study protocol. BMJ Open. 2021 09 24; 11(9):e044194.
Score: 0.133
-
Electronic Health Records' Support for Primary Care Physicians' Situation Awareness: A Metanarrative Review. Hum Factors. 2023 Mar; 65(2):237-259.
Score: 0.130
-
A Program to Provide Clinicians with Feedback on Their Diagnostic Performance in a Learning Health System. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2021 02; 47(2):120-126.
Score: 0.123
-
Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 06 01; 3(6):e206752.
Score: 0.121
-
Health Care Provider Factors Associated with Patient-Reported Adverse Events and Harm. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2020 05; 46(5):282-290.
Score: 0.119
-
An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 10 02; 2(10):e1912638.
Score: 0.116
-
Electronic health records, communication, and data sharing: challenges and opportunities for improving the diagnostic process. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 08 27; 6(3):241-248.
Score: 0.115
-
Barriers and facilitators impacting reliability of the electronic health record-facilitated total testing process. Int J Med Inform. 2019 07; 127:102-108.
Score: 0.112
-
Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 04 01; 25(4):440-446.
Score: 0.104
-
Electronic Trigger-Based Intervention to Reduce Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation for Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 01; 33(31):3560-7.
Score: 0.087
-
Rights and responsibilities of users of electronic health records. CMAJ. 2012 Sep 18; 184(13):1479-83.
Score: 0.068
-
Should patients get direct access to their laboratory test results? An answer with many questions. JAMA. 2011 Dec 14; 306(22):2502-3.
Score: 0.067
-
Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Apr 12; 11:22.
Score: 0.064
-
Primary care and communication in shared cancer care: a qualitative study. Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr; 17(4):259-65.
Score: 0.064
-
Electronic health records to coordinate decision making for complex patients: what can we learn from wiki? Med Decis Making. 2010 Nov-Dec; 30(6):722-31.
Score: 0.062
-
Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med. 2009 Sep 28; 169(17):1578-86.
Score: 0.058
-
Eight rights of safe electronic health record use. JAMA. 2009 Sep 09; 302(10):1111-3.
Score: 0.058
-
Interfacility Referral Communication for PICU Transfer. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun 01; 25(6):499-511.
Score: 0.039
-
Referral communication for pediatric intensive care unit admission and the diagnosis of critically ill children: A pilot ethnography. J Crit Care. 2021 06; 63:246-249.
Score: 0.031
-
Essential activities for electronic health record safety: A qualitative study. Health Informatics J. 2020 12; 26(4):3140-3151.
Score: 0.028
-
Challenges of making a diagnosis in the outpatient setting: a multi-site survey of primary care physicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Aug; 21(8):641-8.
Score: 0.017