HARDEEP SINGH to Electronic Health Records
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HARDEEP SINGH has written about Electronic Health Records.
Connection Strength
23.377
-
Five Strategies for a Safer EHR Modernization Journey. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 10; 38(Suppl 4):940-942.
Score: 0.530
-
Reporting Outcomes of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients to Referring Physicians via an Electronic Health Record-Based Feedback System. Appl Clin Inform. 2022 03; 13(2):495-503.
Score: 0.481
-
Applying requisite imagination to safeguard electronic health record transitions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 04 13; 29(5):1014-1018.
Score: 0.479
-
Guidelines for US Hospitals and Clinicians on Assessment of Electronic Health Record Safety Using SAFER Guides. JAMA. 2022 Feb 22; 327(8):719-720.
Score: 0.474
-
Policies to Promote Shared Responsibility for Safer Electronic Health Records. JAMA. 2021 Oct 19; 326(15):1477-1478.
Score: 0.463
-
Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 01; 37(1):137-144.
Score: 0.448
-
Identifying psychiatric diagnostic errors with the Safer Dx Instrument. Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jul 20; 32(6):405-411.
Score: 0.425
-
How can we partner with electronic health record vendors on the complex journey to safer health care? J Healthc Risk Manag. 2020 Oct; 40(2):34-43.
Score: 0.424
-
A Sociotechnical Framework for Safety-Related Electronic Health Record Research Reporting: The SAFER Reporting Framework. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S92-S100.
Score: 0.421
-
An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 10 02; 2(10):e1912638.
Score: 0.402
-
Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 09; 34(9):1825-1832.
Score: 0.395
-
Barriers and facilitators impacting reliability of the electronic health record-facilitated total testing process. Int J Med Inform. 2019 07; 127:102-108.
Score: 0.388
-
Application of electronic trigger tools to identify targets for improving diagnostic safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 02; 28(2):151-159.
Score: 0.375
-
Adherence to recommended electronic health record safety practices across eight health care organizations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 07 01; 25(7):913-918.
Score: 0.368
-
Electronic health record reviews to measure diagnostic uncertainty in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 06; 24(3):545-551.
Score: 0.363
-
Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 04 01; 25(4):440-446.
Score: 0.362
-
Impact of a national QI programme on reducing electronic health record notifications to clinicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 01; 28(1):10-14.
Score: 0.360
-
Diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting with hematuria: An electronic health record-based study. Urol Oncol. 2018 03; 36(3):88.e19-88.e25.
Score: 0.353
-
Electronic Triggers to Identify Delays in Follow-Up of Mammography: Harnessing the Power of Big Data in Health?Care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 02; 15(2):287-295.
Score: 0.352
-
An electronic trigger based on care escalation to identify preventable adverse events in hospitalised patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 03; 27(3):241-246.
Score: 0.349
-
Toward More Proactive Approaches to Safety in the Electronic Health Record Era. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 10; 43(10):540-547.
Score: 0.348
-
Electronic Health Record Alert-Related Workload as a Predictor of Burnout in Primary Care Providers. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jul 05; 8(3):686-697.
Score: 0.344
-
Electronic Detection of Delayed Test Result Follow-Up in Patients with Hypothyroidism. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul; 32(7):753-759.
Score: 0.334
-
Electronic Health Records Quantify Previously Existing Phenomenon-Physicians Spend Hours Coordinating Care-Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 08 01; 176(8):1235-6.
Score: 0.323
-
Challenges in patient safety improvement research in the era of electronic health records. Healthc (Amst). 2016 Dec; 4(4):285-290.
Score: 0.322
-
A Socio-Technical Approach to Preventing, Mitigating, and Recovering from Ransomware Attacks. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):624-32.
Score: 0.321
-
Computerized Triggers of Big Data to Detect?Delays in Follow-up of Chest Imaging?Results. Chest. 2016 09; 150(3):613-20.
Score: 0.318
-
The Burden of Inbox Notifications in Commercial Electronic Health Records. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 176(4):559-60.
Score: 0.315
-
Implementation Science Workshop: Implementation of an Electronic Referral System in a Large Academic Medical Center. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Mar; 31(3):343-52.
Score: 0.313
-
Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: The Health IT Safety Framework. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr; 25(4):226-32.
Score: 0.303
-
Electronic Trigger-Based Intervention to Reduce Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation for Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 01; 33(31):3560-7.
Score: 0.302
-
Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record-based Triggers to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Abnormal Lung Imaging Findings. Radiology. 2015 Oct; 277(1):81-7.
Score: 0.296
-
Graphical display of diagnostic test results in electronic health records: a comparison of 8 systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul; 22(4):900-4.
Score: 0.293
-
How context affects electronic health record-based test result follow-up: a mixed-methods evaluation. BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 11; 4(11):e005985.
Score: 0.286
-
Electronic alerts and clinician turnover: the influence of user acceptance. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Nov; 20(11 Spec No. 17):SP520-30.
Score: 0.286
-
Which electronic health record is better: A or B? Realities of comparing the effectiveness of electronic health records. J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Sep; 3(5):447-50.
Score: 0.282
-
Contingency planning for electronic health record-based care continuity: a survey of recommended practices. Int J Med Inform. 2014 Nov; 83(11):797-804.
Score: 0.281
-
An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec; 21(6):1053-9.
Score: 0.279
-
The SAFER guides: empowering organizations to improve the safety and effectiveness of electronic health records. Am J Manag Care. 2014 May; 20(5):418-23.
Score: 0.276
-
ONC issues guides for SAFER EHRs. J AHIMA. 2014 Apr; 85(4):50-2.
Score: 0.274
-
Patient access to medical records and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug; 21(4):737-41.
Score: 0.266
-
Toward electronic medical record alerts that consume less physician time--reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Oct 14; 173(18):1756.
Score: 0.266
-
Electronic health record-based triggers to detect potential delays in cancer diagnosis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jan; 23(1):8-16.
Score: 0.261
-
Information overload and missed test results in electronic health record-based settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22; 173(8):702-4.
Score: 0.257
-
Safety Assurance Factors for Electronic Health Record Resilience (SAFER): study protocol. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 12; 13:46.
Score: 0.257
-
A red-flag-based approach to risk management of EHR-related safety concerns. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2013; 33(2):21-6.
Score: 0.252
-
Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug; 20(4):727-35.
Score: 0.251
-
Electronic health records and national patient-safety goals. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 08; 367(19):1854-60.
Score: 0.249
-
Improving test result follow-up through electronic health records requires more than just an alert. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct; 27(10):1235-7.
Score: 0.247
-
Effectiveness of an electronic health record-based intervention to improve follow-up of abnormal pathology results: a retrospective record analysis. Med Care. 2012 Oct; 50(10):898-904.
Score: 0.247
-
Rights and responsibilities of users of electronic health records. CMAJ. 2012 Sep 18; 184(13):1479-83.
Score: 0.237
-
Electronic health record-based messages to primary care providers: valuable information or just noise? Arch Intern Med. 2012 Feb 13; 172(3):283-5.
Score: 0.237
-
Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis. Am J Med. 2012 Feb; 125(2):209.e1-7.
Score: 0.236
-
Creating an oversight infrastructure for electronic health record-related patient safety hazards. J Patient Saf. 2011 Dec; 7(4):169-74.
Score: 0.233
-
Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb; 21(2):93-100.
Score: 0.231
-
Towards successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis. Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 27; 6:84.
Score: 0.228
-
Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Apr 12; 11:22.
Score: 0.223
-
Legal, ethical, and financial dilemmas in electronic health record adoption and use. Pediatrics. 2011 Apr; 127(4):e1042-7.
Score: 0.222
-
Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan; 26(1):64-9.
Score: 0.215
-
Characteristics and predictors of missed opportunities in lung cancer diagnosis: an electronic health record-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 10; 28(20):3307-15.
Score: 0.211
-
Ten strategies to improve management of abnormal test result alerts in the electronic health record. J Patient Saf. 2010 Jun; 6(2):121-3.
Score: 0.210
-
Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb; 17(1):71-7.
Score: 0.204
-
Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Dec 09; 9:49.
Score: 0.204
-
Developing electronic clinical quality measures to assess the cancer diagnostic process. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 08 18; 30(9):1526-1531.
Score: 0.131
-
Leveraging the Electronic Health Record to Implement Emergency Department Delirium Screening. Appl Clin Inform. 2023 05; 14(3):478-486.
Score: 0.128
-
Translating electronic health record-based patient safety algorithms from research to clinical practice at multiple sites. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Jul; 29(1).
Score: 0.121
-
Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 05 11; 29(6):1091-1100.
Score: 0.120
-
Frequency of diagnostic errors in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study. J Perinatol. 2022 10; 42(10):1312-1318.
Score: 0.119
-
Validation of an electronic trigger to measure missed diagnosis of stroke in emergency departments. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 09 18; 28(10):2202-2211.
Score: 0.115
-
Electronic Health Records' Support for Primary Care Physicians' Situation Awareness: A Metanarrative Review. Hum Factors. 2023 Mar; 65(2):237-259.
Score: 0.113
-
Building the evidence-base to reduce electronic health record-related clinician burden. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 04 23; 28(5):1057-1061.
Score: 0.112
-
Identifying trigger concepts to screen emergency department visits for diagnostic errors. Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 08 26; 8(3):340-346.
Score: 0.109
-
Application of Human Factors Methods to Understand Missed Follow-up of Abnormal Test Results. Appl Clin Inform. 2020 10; 11(5):692-698.
Score: 0.108
-
COVID-19 and the Need for a National Health Information Technology Infrastructure. JAMA. 2020 06 16; 323(23):2373-2374.
Score: 0.105
-
Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 06 01; 3(6):e206752.
Score: 0.105
-
Imaging activity possibly signalling missed diagnostic opportunities in bladder and kidney cancer: A longitudinal data-linkage study using primary care electronic health records. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 06; 66:101703.
Score: 0.104
-
Electronic health records, communication, and data sharing: challenges and opportunities for improving the diagnostic process. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 08 27; 6(3):241-248.
Score: 0.100
-
Follow-up of Abnormal Estimated GFR Results Within a Large Integrated Health Care Delivery System: A Mixed-Methods Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 11; 74(5):589-600.
Score: 0.099
-
Essential activities for electronic health record safety: A qualitative study. Health Informatics J. 2020 12; 26(4):3140-3151.
Score: 0.097
-
Test results management and distributed cognition in electronic health record-enabled primary care. Health Informatics J. 2019 12; 25(4):1549-1562.
Score: 0.092
-
Improving the safety of health information technology requires shared responsibility: It is time we all step up. Healthc (Amst). 2018 Mar; 6(1):7-12.
Score: 0.086
-
Errors in Diagnosis of Spinal Epidural Abscesses in the Era of Electronic Health Records. Am J Med. 2017 08; 130(8):975-981.
Score: 0.084
-
Application of Electronic Algorithms to Improve Diagnostic Evaluation for Bladder Cancer. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 03 22; 8(1):279-290.
Score: 0.084
-
Variation in high-priority drug-drug interaction alerts across institutions and electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):331-338.
Score: 0.084
-
Safety huddles to proactively identify and address electronic health record safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 01; 24(2):261-267.
Score: 0.084
-
Finding Diagnostic Errors in Children Admitted to the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar; 18(3):265-271.
Score: 0.084
-
Communicating Findings of Delayed Diagnostic Evaluation to Primary Care Providers. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jul-Aug; 29(4):469-73.
Score: 0.080
-
Workarounds and Test Results Follow-up in Electronic Health Record-Based Primary Care. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):543-59.
Score: 0.080
-
Emergency physicians' views of direct notification of laboratory and radiology results to patients using the Internet: a multisite survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 04; 17(3):e60.
Score: 0.073
-
Releasing test results directly to patients: A multisite survey of physician perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun; 98(6):788-96.
Score: 0.073
-
Electronic health record-related safety concerns: a cross-sectional survey. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2014; 34(1):14-26.
Score: 0.067
-
Rights and responsibilities of electronic health records (EHR) users caring for children. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2013 12; 111(6):468-71.
Score: 0.067
-
Exploring the sociotechnical intersection of patient safety and electronic health record implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb; 21(e1):e28-34.
Score: 0.066
-
Root cause analysis reports help identify common factors in delayed diagnosis and treatment of outpatients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug; 32(8):1368-75.
Score: 0.065
-
Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25; 173(6):418-25.
Score: 0.064
-
Should patients get direct access to their laboratory test results? An answer with many questions. JAMA. 2011 Dec 14; 306(22):2502-3.
Score: 0.058
-
A prototype knowledge base and SMART app to facilitate organization of patient medications by clinical problems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011; 2011:888-94.
Score: 0.058
-
Primary care and communication in shared cancer care: a qualitative study. Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr; 17(4):259-65.
Score: 0.056
-
Summarization of clinical information: a conceptual model. J Biomed Inform. 2011 Aug; 44(4):688-99.
Score: 0.056
-
Reducing diagnostic error through medical home-based primary care reform. JAMA. 2010 Jul 28; 304(4):463-4.
Score: 0.053
-
Reducing referral delays in colorectal cancer diagnosis: is it about how you ask? Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct; 19(5):e27.
Score: 0.053
-
Underdiagnosis of Lynch syndrome involves more than family history criteria. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jun; 8(6):523-9.
Score: 0.052
-
Changes in electronic notification volume and primary care provider burnout. Am J Manag Care. 2023 01; 29(1):57-63.
Score: 0.031
-
Development and Validation of the Houston-BEST, a Barrett's Esophagus Risk Prediction Model Adaptable to Electronic Health Records. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 08; 21(9):2424-2426.e0.
Score: 0.031
-
Development and Validation of an Electronic Trigger to Monitor Follow-up for Moderately Elevated, Outpatient Serum Potassium Levels. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 10; 37(13):3512-3514.
Score: 0.030
-
Laboratory monitoring to reduce adverse drug-related events: a mixed methods study. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jan; 28(1):16-25.
Score: 0.029
-
Artificial Intelligence Techniques That May Be Applied to Primary Care Data to Facilitate Earlier Diagnosis of Cancer: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021 03 03; 23(3):e23483.
Score: 0.028
-
Detection and Remediation of Misidentification Errors in Radiology Examination Ordering. Appl Clin Inform. 2020 01; 11(1):79-87.
Score: 0.026
-
Missed Diagnosis of New-Onset Systolic Heart Failure at First Presentation in Children with No Known Heart Disease. J Pediatr. 2019 05; 208:258-264.e3.
Score: 0.024
-
Development and field testing of a self-assessment guide for computer-based provider order entry. J Healthc Manag. 2014 Sep-Oct; 59(5):338-52.
Score: 0.018