Header Logo

Connection

HARDEEP SINGH to Electronic Health Records

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HARDEEP SINGH has written about Electronic Health Records.
HARDEEP SINGH
Connection Strength
25.419
Electronic Health Records
  1. Revisions to the Safety Assurance Factors for Electronic Health Record Resilience (SAFER) Guides to update national recommendations for safe use of electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 04 01; 32(4):755-760.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.557
  2. Implementation of Electronic Triggers to Identify Diagnostic Errors in Emergency Departments. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 01; 185(2):143-151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.551
  3. Epidemiology of diagnostic errors in pediatric emergency departments using electronic triggers. Acad Emerg Med. 2025 03; 32(3):226-245.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.549
  4. Charting Diagnostic Safety: Exploring Patient-Provider Discordance in Medical Record Documentation. J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar; 40(4):773-781.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.536
  5. Development and Implementation of a Digital Quality Measure of Emergency Cancer Diagnosis. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 20; 42(21):2506-2515.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.524
  6. Five Strategies for a Safer EHR Modernization Journey. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 10; 38(Suppl 4):940-942.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.502
  7. Reporting Outcomes of Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients to Referring Physicians via an Electronic Health Record-Based Feedback System. Appl Clin Inform. 2022 03; 13(2):495-503.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.456
  8. Applying requisite imagination to safeguard electronic health record transitions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 04 13; 29(5):1014-1018.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.454
  9. Guidelines for US Hospitals and Clinicians on Assessment of Electronic Health Record Safety Using SAFER Guides. JAMA. 2022 Feb 22; 327(8):719-720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.449
  10. Policies to Promote Shared Responsibility for Safer Electronic Health Records. JAMA. 2021 Oct 19; 326(15):1477-1478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.439
  11. Why Test Results Are Still Getting "Lost" to Follow-up: a Qualitative Study of Implementation Gaps. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 01; 37(1):137-144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.425
  12. Identifying psychiatric diagnostic errors with the Safer Dx Instrument. Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jul 20; 32(6):405-411.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.402
  13. How can we partner with electronic health record vendors on the complex journey to safer health care? J Healthc Risk Manag. 2020 Oct; 40(2):34-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.402
  14. A Sociotechnical Framework for Safety-Related Electronic Health Record Research Reporting: The SAFER Reporting Framework. Ann Intern Med. 2020 06 02; 172(11 Suppl):S92-S100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.399
  15. An Exploration of Barriers, Facilitators, and Suggestions for Improving Electronic Health Record Inbox-Related Usability: A Qualitative Analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 10 02; 2(10):e1912638.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.381
  16. Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 09; 34(9):1825-1832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.375
  17. Barriers and facilitators impacting reliability of the electronic health record-facilitated total testing process. Int J Med Inform. 2019 07; 127:102-108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.368
  18. Application of electronic trigger tools to identify targets for improving diagnostic safety. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 02; 28(2):151-159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.356
  19. Adherence to recommended electronic health record safety practices across eight health care organizations. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 07 01; 25(7):913-918.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.349
  20. Electronic health record reviews to measure diagnostic uncertainty in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 06; 24(3):545-551.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.344
  21. Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 04 01; 25(4):440-446.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.343
  22. Impact of a national QI programme on reducing electronic health record notifications to clinicians. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 01; 28(1):10-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.341
  23. Diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting with hematuria: An electronic health record-based study. Urol Oncol. 2018 03; 36(3):88.e19-88.e25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.335
  24. Electronic Triggers to Identify Delays in Follow-Up of Mammography: Harnessing the Power of Big Data in Health?Care. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 02; 15(2):287-295.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.333
  25. An electronic trigger based on care escalation to identify preventable adverse events in hospitalised patients. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 03; 27(3):241-246.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.331
  26. Toward More Proactive Approaches to Safety in the Electronic Health Record Era. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 10; 43(10):540-547.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.329
  27. Electronic Health Record Alert-Related Workload as a Predictor of Burnout in Primary Care Providers. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 Jul 05; 8(3):686-697.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.326
  28. Electronic Detection of Delayed Test Result Follow-Up in Patients with Hypothyroidism. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jul; 32(7):753-759.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.316
  29. Electronic Health Records Quantify Previously Existing Phenomenon-Physicians Spend Hours Coordinating Care-Reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 08 01; 176(8):1235-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.306
  30. Challenges in patient safety improvement research in the era of electronic health records. Healthc (Amst). 2016 Dec; 4(4):285-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.305
  31. A Socio-Technical Approach to Preventing, Mitigating, and Recovering from Ransomware Attacks. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):624-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.304
  32. Computerized Triggers of Big Data to Detect?Delays in Follow-up of Chest Imaging?Results. Chest. 2016 09; 150(3):613-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.301
  33. The Burden of Inbox Notifications in Commercial Electronic Health Records. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Apr; 176(4):559-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.299
  34. Implementation Science Workshop: Implementation of an Electronic Referral System in a Large Academic Medical Center. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Mar; 31(3):343-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.297
  35. Measuring and improving patient safety through health information technology: The Health IT Safety Framework. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Apr; 25(4):226-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.288
  36. Electronic Trigger-Based Intervention to Reduce Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation for Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 01; 33(31):3560-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.286
  37. Development and Validation of Electronic Health Record-based Triggers to Detect Delays in Follow-up of Abnormal Lung Imaging Findings. Radiology. 2015 Oct; 277(1):81-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.281
  38. Graphical display of diagnostic test results in electronic health records: a comparison of 8 systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul; 22(4):900-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.278
  39. How context affects electronic health record-based test result follow-up: a mixed-methods evaluation. BMJ Open. 2014 Nov 11; 4(11):e005985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.271
  40. Electronic alerts and clinician turnover: the influence of user acceptance. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Nov; 20(11 Spec No. 17):SP520-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.271
  41. Which electronic health record is better: A or B? Realities of comparing the effectiveness of electronic health records. J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Sep; 3(5):447-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.268
  42. Contingency planning for electronic health record-based care continuity: a survey of recommended practices. Int J Med Inform. 2014 Nov; 83(11):797-804.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.266
  43. An analysis of electronic health record-related patient safety concerns. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec; 21(6):1053-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.264
  44. The SAFER guides: empowering organizations to improve the safety and effectiveness of electronic health records. Am J Manag Care. 2014 May; 20(5):418-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.262
  45. ONC issues guides for SAFER EHRs. J AHIMA. 2014 Apr; 85(4):50-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.260
  46. Patient access to medical records and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug; 21(4):737-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.252
  47. Toward electronic medical record alerts that consume less physician time--reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Oct 14; 173(18):1756.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.252
  48. Electronic health record-based triggers to detect potential delays in cancer diagnosis. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Jan; 23(1):8-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.248
  49. Information overload and missed test results in electronic health record-based settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Apr 22; 173(8):702-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.244
  50. Safety Assurance Factors for Electronic Health Record Resilience (SAFER): study protocol. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Apr 12; 13:46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.243
  51. A red-flag-based approach to risk management of EHR-related safety concerns. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2013; 33(2):21-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.239
  52. Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug; 20(4):727-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.238
  53. Electronic health records and national patient-safety goals. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 08; 367(19):1854-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.236
  54. Improving test result follow-up through electronic health records requires more than just an alert. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct; 27(10):1235-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  55. Effectiveness of an electronic health record-based intervention to improve follow-up of abnormal pathology results: a retrospective record analysis. Med Care. 2012 Oct; 50(10):898-904.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.234
  56. Rights and responsibilities of users of electronic health records. CMAJ. 2012 Sep 18; 184(13):1479-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  57. Electronic health record-based messages to primary care providers: valuable information or just noise? Arch Intern Med. 2012 Feb 13; 172(3):283-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  58. Notifications received by primary care practitioners in electronic health records: a taxonomy and time analysis. Am J Med. 2012 Feb; 125(2):209.e1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.224
  59. Creating an oversight infrastructure for electronic health record-related patient safety hazards. J Patient Saf. 2011 Dec; 7(4):169-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  60. Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb; 21(2):93-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  61. Towards successful coordination of electronic health record based-referrals: a qualitative analysis. Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 27; 6:84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.216
  62. Understanding the management of electronic test result notifications in the outpatient setting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Apr 12; 11:22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  63. Legal, ethical, and financial dilemmas in electronic health record adoption and use. Pediatrics. 2011 Apr; 127(4):e1042-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  64. Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jan; 26(1):64-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.203
  65. Characteristics and predictors of missed opportunities in lung cancer diagnosis: an electronic health record-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jul 10; 28(20):3307-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.200
  66. Ten strategies to improve management of abnormal test result alerts in the electronic health record. J Patient Saf. 2010 Jun; 6(2):121-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  67. Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb; 17(1):71-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  68. Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009 Dec 09; 9:49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.193
  69. Frequent Missed Opportunities for Earlier Diagnosis of Advanced-Stage Colorectal or Lung Cancer. JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Sep 01; 185(9):1102-1108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.143
  70. Application of a digital quality measure for cancer diagnosis in Epic Cosmos. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 01 01; 32(1):227-229.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  71. Machine Learning to Enhance Electronic Detection of Diagnostic Errors. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 09 03; 7(9):e2431982.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  72. An electronic trigger to detect telemedicine-related diagnostic errors. J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Aug; 31(7):1050-1055.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  73. Developing electronic clinical quality measures to assess the cancer diagnostic process. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 08 18; 30(9):1526-1531.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  74. Leveraging the Electronic Health Record to Implement Emergency Department Delirium Screening. Appl Clin Inform. 2023 05; 14(3):478-486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  75. Translating electronic health record-based patient safety algorithms from research to clinical practice at multiple sites. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Jul; 29(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  76. Inviting patients to identify diagnostic concerns through structured evaluation of their online visit notes. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 05 11; 29(6):1091-1100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  77. Frequency of diagnostic errors in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study. J Perinatol. 2022 10; 42(10):1312-1318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  78. Validation of an electronic trigger to measure missed diagnosis of stroke in emergency departments. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 09 18; 28(10):2202-2211.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  79. Electronic Health Records' Support for Primary Care Physicians' Situation Awareness: A Metanarrative Review. Hum Factors. 2023 Mar; 65(2):237-259.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  80. Building the evidence-base to reduce electronic health record-related clinician burden. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 04 23; 28(5):1057-1061.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  81. Identifying trigger concepts to screen emergency department visits for diagnostic errors. Diagnosis (Berl). 2021 08 26; 8(3):340-346.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  82. Application of Human Factors Methods to Understand Missed Follow-up of Abnormal Test Results. Appl Clin Inform. 2020 10; 11(5):692-698.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  83. COVID-19 and the Need for a National Health Information Technology Infrastructure. JAMA. 2020 06 16; 323(23):2373-2374.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  84. Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 06 01; 3(6):e206752.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  85. Imaging activity possibly signalling missed diagnostic opportunities in bladder and kidney cancer: A longitudinal data-linkage study using primary care electronic health records. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 06; 66:101703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  86. Electronic health records, communication, and data sharing: challenges and opportunities for improving the diagnostic process. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 08 27; 6(3):241-248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  87. Follow-up of Abnormal Estimated GFR Results Within a Large Integrated Health Care Delivery System: A Mixed-Methods Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 11; 74(5):589-600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  88. Essential activities for electronic health record safety: A qualitative study. Health Informatics J. 2020 12; 26(4):3140-3151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  89. Test results management and distributed cognition in electronic health record-enabled primary care. Health Informatics J. 2019 12; 25(4):1549-1562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  90. Improving the safety of health information technology requires shared responsibility: It is time we all step up. Healthc (Amst). 2018 Mar; 6(1):7-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  91. Errors in Diagnosis of Spinal Epidural Abscesses in the Era of Electronic Health Records. Am J Med. 2017 08; 130(8):975-981.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  92. Application of Electronic Algorithms to Improve Diagnostic Evaluation for Bladder Cancer. Appl Clin Inform. 2017 03 22; 8(1):279-290.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  93. Variation in high-priority drug-drug interaction alerts across institutions and electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 03 01; 24(2):331-338.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  94. Safety huddles to proactively identify and address electronic health record safety. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Mar 01; 24(2):261-267.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  95. Finding Diagnostic Errors in Children Admitted to the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar; 18(3):265-271.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  96. Communicating Findings of Delayed Diagnostic Evaluation to Primary Care Providers. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jul-Aug; 29(4):469-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  97. Workarounds and Test Results Follow-up in Electronic Health Record-Based Primary Care. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):543-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  98. Emergency physicians' views of direct notification of laboratory and radiology results to patients using the Internet: a multisite survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Mar 04; 17(3):e60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  99. Releasing test results directly to patients: A multisite survey of physician perspectives. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun; 98(6):788-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  100. Electronic health record-related safety concerns: a cross-sectional survey. J Healthc Risk Manag. 2014; 34(1):14-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  101. Rights and responsibilities of electronic health records (EHR) users caring for children. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2013 12; 111(6):468-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  102. Exploring the sociotechnical intersection of patient safety and electronic health record implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb; 21(e1):e28-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  103. Root cause analysis reports help identify common factors in delayed diagnosis and treatment of outpatients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Aug; 32(8):1368-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  104. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25; 173(6):418-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  105. Should patients get direct access to their laboratory test results? An answer with many questions. JAMA. 2011 Dec 14; 306(22):2502-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  106. A prototype knowledge base and SMART app to facilitate organization of patient medications by clinical problems. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011; 2011:888-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  107. Primary care and communication in shared cancer care: a qualitative study. Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr; 17(4):259-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  108. Summarization of clinical information: a conceptual model. J Biomed Inform. 2011 Aug; 44(4):688-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  109. Reducing diagnostic error through medical home-based primary care reform. JAMA. 2010 Jul 28; 304(4):463-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  110. Reducing referral delays in colorectal cancer diagnosis: is it about how you ask? Qual Saf Health Care. 2010 Oct; 19(5):e27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  111. Underdiagnosis of Lynch syndrome involves more than family history criteria. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jun; 8(6):523-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  112. Changes in electronic notification volume and primary care provider burnout. Am J Manag Care. 2023 01; 29(1):57-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  113. Development and Validation of the Houston-BEST, a Barrett's Esophagus Risk Prediction Model Adaptable to Electronic Health Records. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 08; 21(9):2424-2426.e0.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  114. Development and Validation of an Electronic Trigger to Monitor Follow-up for Moderately Elevated, Outpatient Serum Potassium Levels. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 10; 37(13):3512-3514.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  115. Laboratory monitoring to reduce adverse drug-related events: a mixed methods study. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jan; 28(1):16-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  116. Artificial Intelligence Techniques That May Be Applied to Primary Care Data to Facilitate Earlier Diagnosis of Cancer: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021 03 03; 23(3):e23483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  117. Detection and Remediation of Misidentification Errors in Radiology Examination Ordering. Appl Clin Inform. 2020 01; 11(1):79-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  118. Missed Diagnosis of New-Onset Systolic Heart Failure at First Presentation in Children with No Known Heart Disease. J Pediatr. 2019 05; 208:258-264.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  119. Development and field testing of a self-assessment guide for computer-based provider order entry. J Healthc Manag. 2014 Sep-Oct; 59(5):338-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.