Header Logo

Connection

HARDEEP SINGH to Primary Health Care

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications HARDEEP SINGH has written about Primary Health Care.
HARDEEP SINGH
Connection Strength
7.904
Primary Health Care
  1. An electronic trigger to detect telemedicine-related diagnostic errors. J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Aug; 31(7):1050-1055.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.551
  2. Practicing Clinicians' Recommendations to Reduce Burden from the Electronic Health Record Inbox: a Mixed-Methods Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 09; 34(9):1825-1832.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.397
  3. Electronic health record reviews to measure diagnostic uncertainty in primary care. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 06; 24(3):545-551.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.365
  4. General Internists in Pursuit of Diagnostic Excellence in Primary Care: a #ProudtobeGIM Thread That Unites Us All. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 04; 33(4):395-396.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.363
  5. Diagnostic evaluation of patients presenting with hematuria: An electronic health record-based study. Urol Oncol. 2018 03; 36(3):88.e19-88.e25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  6. Improving Diagnostic Safety in Primary Care by Unlocking Digital Data. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 01; 43(1):29-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.328
  7. The global burden of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Jun; 26(6):484-494.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.325
  8. Communicating Findings of Delayed Diagnostic Evaluation to Primary Care Providers. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Jul-Aug; 29(4):469-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.322
  9. Accuracy of the Safer Dx Instrument to Identify Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 06; 31(6):602-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.314
  10. Setting the record straight on measuring diagnostic errors. Reply to: 'Bad assumptions on primary care diagnostic errors' by Dr Richard Young. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May; 24(5):345-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.294
  11. Electronic alerts and clinician turnover: the influence of user acceptance. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Nov; 20(11 Spec No. 17):SP520-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.287
  12. Origins of diagnostic error--reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Nov 11; 173(20):1926-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.268
  13. Resilient actions in the diagnostic process and system performance. BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Dec; 22(12):1006-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.261
  14. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25; 173(6):418-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.257
  15. Electronic health record-based messages to primary care providers: valuable information or just noise? Arch Intern Med. 2012 Feb 13; 172(3):283-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.238
  16. Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Feb; 21(2):93-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  17. Exploring situational awareness in diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Jan; 21(1):30-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  18. Reducing diagnostic error through medical home-based primary care reform. JAMA. 2010 Jul 28; 304(4):463-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.213
  19. Notification of abnormal lab test results in an electronic medical record: do any safety concerns remain? Am J Med. 2010 Mar; 123(3):238-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  20. Missed and delayed diagnosis of dementia in primary care: prevalence and contributing factors. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009 Oct-Dec; 23(4):306-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.202
  21. Identifying diagnostic errors in primary care using an electronic screening algorithm. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 12; 167(3):302-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  22. Communicating blood test results in primary care: a mixed-methods systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Apr; 75(753):e222-e231.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  23. How is diagnostic uncertainty communicated and managed in real world primary care settings? BMC Prim Care. 2024 Aug 12; 25(1):296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  24. Quality of care for hypertension and diabetes in federal- versus commercial-managed care organizations. Am J Med Qual. 2004 Jan-Feb; 19(1):19-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  25. Identifying psychiatric diagnostic errors with the Safer Dx Instrument. Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 Jul 20; 32(6):405-411.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  26. Recommendations for using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument to help measure and improve diagnostic safety. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019 11 26; 6(4):315-323.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.102
  27. Quality of the diagnostic process in patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of bladder or kidney cancer: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019 10 03; 9(10):e029143.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  28. Influence of doctor-patient conversations on behaviours of patients presenting to primary care with new or persistent symptoms: a video observation study. BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 03; 29(3):198-208.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  29. The design and conduct of Project RedDE: A cluster-randomized trial to reduce diagnostic errors in pediatric primary care. Clin Trials. 2019 04; 16(2):154-164.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  30. General Internists in Pursuit of Diagnostic Excellence. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 12; 33(12):2026.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  31. Test results management and distributed cognition in electronic health record-enabled primary care. Health Informatics J. 2019 12; 25(4):1549-1562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  32. Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care Pediatrics: Project RedDE. Acad Pediatr. 2018 03; 18(2):220-227.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  33. Workarounds and Test Results Follow-up in Electronic Health Record-Based Primary Care. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(2):543-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  34. Electronic Trigger-Based Intervention to Reduce Delays in Diagnostic Evaluation for Cancer: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 01; 33(31):3560-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  35. Primary care practitioners' views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jul-Aug; 20(4):727-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  36. Primary care and communication in shared cancer care: a qualitative study. Am J Manag Care. 2011 Apr; 17(4):259-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  37. Provider management strategies of abnormal test result alerts: a cognitive task analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb; 17(1):71-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  38. Diagnostic errors in ambulatory care: dimensions and preventive strategies. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Sep; 14 Suppl 1:57-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  39. Agreement between patient's description of abdominal symptoms of possible upper gastrointestinal cancer and general practitioner consultation notes: a qualitative analysis of video-recorded UK primary care consultation data. BMJ Open. 2023 01 05; 13(1):e058766.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  40. Changes in electronic notification volume and primary care provider burnout. Am J Manag Care. 2023 01; 29(1):57-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  41. Incidence, origins and avoidable harm of missed opportunities in diagnosis: longitudinal patient record review in 21 English general practices. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 12; 30(12):977-985.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  42. Artificial Intelligence Techniques That May Be Applied to Primary Care Data to Facilitate Earlier Diagnosis of Cancer: Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021 03 03; 23(3):e23483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  43. Imaging activity possibly signalling missed diagnostic opportunities in bladder and kidney cancer: A longitudinal data-linkage study using primary care electronic health records. Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 06; 66:101703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.